JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Sustainability Evaluation for Shellfish Production in Gamak Bay Based on the Systems Ecology 1. EMERGY Evaluation for Shellfish Production in Gamak Bay
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Sustainability Evaluation for Shellfish Production in Gamak Bay Based on the Systems Ecology 1. EMERGY Evaluation for Shellfish Production in Gamak Bay
Oh, Hyun-Taik; Lee, Suk-Mo; Lee, Won-Chan; Jung, Rae-Hong; Hong, Suk-Jin; Kim, Nam-Kook; Tilburg, Charles;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This research outlines a new method for evaluation of shellfish production in Gamak Bay based on the concept of EMERGY. Better understanding of those environmental factors influencing oyster production and the management of oyster stocks requires the ability to assess the real value of environmental sources such as solar energy, river, tide, wave, wind, and other physical mechanisms. In this research, EMERGY flows from environment sources were 76% for shellfish aquaculture in Gamak Bay. EMERGY yield ratio, Environmental Loading Ratio, and Sustainability Index were 4.26, 0.31 and 13.89, respectively. Using the Emergy evaluation data, the predicted maximum shellfish aquaculture production in Gamak Bay and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration, U.S.) designated area in Gamak Bay were 10,845 ton/y and 7,548 ton/yr, respectively. Since the predicted shellfish production was approximately 1.3 times more than produced shellfish production in 2005, the carrying capacity of Gamak Bay is estimated to be 1.3 times more than the present oyster production.
 Keywords
EMERGY;Gamak Bay;FDA designated area;Oyster production;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
전남 남부 반폐쇄적인 내만 갯벌 퇴적물의 지화학적 특성,황동운;김평중;전상백;고병설;

한국수산과학회지, 2013. vol.46. 5, pp.638-648 crossref(new window)
2.
한국 경제와 자연환경의 에머지 평가: 해양생태계서비스 가치평가 시사점,강대석;

한국해양환경ㆍ에너지학회지, 2015. vol.18. 2, pp.102-115 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
백상호, 1998, 판별함수에 의한 진해만 적조발생의 예찰수법, 석사 학위논문, 여수대학교, 여수

2.
Odum H. T., 1996, Environmental Accounting, Emergy and Environmental Decision Making, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 294-303

3.
Odum H. T., 1988, Self organization, transformity and information, Science, 242, 1132-1139 crossref(new window)

4.
Odum H. T., 1983, System Ecology: An Introduction, John Wiley & Sons International Rights, Inc., 10-25

5.
Odum H. T., 2001, Emergy evaluation of salmon pen culture, University of Florida Press, 110-125

6.
Brown M. T., Bardi E., 2001, Emergy of Ecosystems. Emergy. Folio 4. of Handbook of Emergy Evaluation The Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, 93pp

7.
신봉균, 2007, 하수슬러지의 처분에 대한 생태경제성 평가, 석사학위논문, 부경대학교, 부산

8.
엄기혁, 손지호, 조은일, 이석모, 박청길, 1996, Emergy 분석법에 의한 득량만의 환경용량 산정, 한국환경과학회지, 29(5), 629-636

9.
김남국, 2001, 시스템 생태학적 접근법에 의한 넙치 생산의 지속성 평가, 석사학위 논문, 부경대학교, 부산

10.
Brown M. T., Ulgiati S., 2001, Emergy measures of carrying capacity to evaluate economic investments, Population & Environment, 22(5), 471-501 crossref(new window)

11.
조은일, 박청길, 이석모, 1996, 가막만의 환경용량 산정 (I) - 생태계 모델을 이용한 기초생산력 산정, 한국수산학회지, 29(3), 369-385

12.
박영철, 최광식, 2002, 가막만 양식 참굴의 성장과 환경용량 추정에 대한 연구, 한국 환경생물학회, 20(4), 378-385