JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Pollutant Removal in Variable HRT Using the Aerobic Biofilm
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Pollutant Removal in Variable HRT Using the Aerobic Biofilm
Ahn, Kwang-Ho; Ko, Kwang-Baik; Kim, I-Tae; Kim, Kwang-Soo;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In this study, an experiment was conducted on influent water with low concentrations of organic matter, such as river water or secondary treatment water of a sewage treatment plant, according to HRT changes by using aerobic biofilm. In the biofilm process, as the biofilm increases in thickness, the inner membrane can be low in oxygen transfer rate and become anaerobic conditions, while the detachment of biomass from biofilm occurs. To overcome these limitations in the detachment of microorganisms in biofilm, the yarn, which was made from poly propylene(PP), was weaved and manufactured into a tube. Then, a test was carried out by injecting air so that the interior of the biofilm could create aerobic conditions. The results of the experiment showed that the removal efficiency of reached 66.1~81.2% by HRT 2hr, and 50.9 ~61.8% after HRT 1 hr. The removal efficiency of was 45.9 to 55.1% by HRT 1hr, and 26.1% in HRT 0.5hr, showing the highest removal efficiency in HRT 1hr. The SS removal efficiency was at 81.8 to 94.6%, and the effluent SS concentration was very low, indicating less than 2.2 mg/L in all HRT's. As a result, the and -N that were removed per specific surface area and attached to microbial biofilm showed the highest efficiency in HRT 1hr with 8.37 , 2.93 . From the result of reviewing the characteristics of biofilm growth, microorganisms were found to be attached, and increased by 36 days. Later, they decreased in number through detachment, but showed a tendency to increase again 41 days later due to microbial reproduction.
 Keywords
Pollutant removal;Aerobic biofilm;HRT;Microorganisms;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
APHA, 1998, AWWA, WEF, Standard Methods for the Examination of water and wastewater, 20th edition.

2.
Boller, M., Gujer, W., Tschui, M., 1994, Parameters affecting nitrifying biofilm reactors, Water Science and Technology, 29(10-11), 1-11.

3.
Chen, S., Ling, J., Blancheton, J. P., 2006, Nitrification kinetics of biofilm as affected by water quality factors, Aquacultural Engineering, 34(3), 179-197. crossref(new window)

4.
Choi, D. H., Bae, W., Park, S. J., Chung, J. W., 2003, Characteristics of wastewater treatment according to the variation of HRT and DO in biological aerated filter process, J. of KSEE, 25(11), 1337-1343.

5.
Chung, J. C., 1994, Microbial aspects of the biofilm, J. of KSEE, 16(5), 589-600.

6.
Hay, C. T., Khor, S. L., Darren, D. S., James, O. L., 2009, Influence of a prolonged solid retention time environment on nitrification/ denitrification and sludge production in a submerged membrane bioreactor, Desalination 245(1-3), 28-43. crossref(new window)

7.
Harremoes, P., 1982, Criteria for nitrification in fixed film reactors, Water Science and Technology, 14(1-2), 167-187.

8.
Kim, M. H., Rah, S. W., Cho, K. K., Park, T. J., 2002a, Nitrogen removal reproducibility from weak organic sewage using pilot scale BNR process applied fixed biofilm, J. of KSEE, 24(6), 995-1003.

9.
Kim, I. T., Park, J. N., Chung, W. S., Song, H. M., 2002b, Removal characteristics of the low concentration sewage discharged into stream by biofilm method, 2002 KSWW&KSWQ fall conference, D31-C34.

10.
Lee, C. G., Kim, J. S., Kang, I. S., Lee, B. H., 1997, A study of attached biomass back washing in fixed film system, J. of the Korean environmental sciences society, 6(3), 219-224.

11.
Lee, L. Y., Ong, S. L., Ng, W. J., 2004, Biofilm morphology and nitrification activities: recovery of nitrifying biofilm particles covered with heterotrophic outgrowth, Bioresource Technology, 95(2), 209-214. crossref(new window)

12.
Park, J. B, Park, S. K, Hur, H. W, Kang, H., 2009, Estimation of kinetic coefficient in submerged membrane bioreactor for biological nutrient removal, J. of KSEE, 32(2), 109-113.

13.
Park, Y. S., Song, S. K., 1998, Influence of substrate on the micororganisms attachment and the biofilm growth, J. of KSEE, 20(11), 1579-1589.

14.
Randall, C., Sen, D., 1996, Full-scale evaluation of an integrated fixed-film activated sludge(IFAS) process for enhanced nitrogen removal, Water Science and Technology, 33(12), 155-162.

15.
Rim, J. M., Kwon, J. H., Han, D. J., 1995, Control of excessive biofilm for the treatment of high strength organic wastewater by biofilm process, Korean J. sanitation, 10(3), 67-77.

16.
Ryu, H. D., Lee, S. I., 2006, Comparison of removal characteristics of organic matter, nitorgen and phosphorus in suspended-growth and hybrid processes with hydraulic retention time, J. of KSEE, 28(1), 15-25.

17.
Semmens, M. J., Dahm, K., Shanahan, J., Christianson, A., 2003, COD and nitrogen removal by biofilms growing on gas permeable membranes, Water Research, 37(18), 4343-4350. crossref(new window)

18.
Shin, H. S., Lim, K. H., Lee, E. S., Choi, G. W., 1995, Removal of organic contaminants in water supplies by biofilm reactor, J. KSWQ, 11(4), 341-349.

19.
Tijhuis, L., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., Heijnen, J. J., 1994, Formation and growth of heterotrophic aerobic biofilms on small suspended particles in airlift reactors, Biotechnology Bioengineering, 44(5), 595-608. crossref(new window)