JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Development and Application of the Student-centered Elementary Science Textbook Model: Focusing on Earth Science
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Development and Application of the Student-centered Elementary Science Textbook Model: Focusing on Earth Science
Chae, Dong-hyun; Lim, Sung-man; Lee, Hyo-nyong; Han, Je-jun; Lee, Sang-gyun; Kim, Eun-jeong;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop the student-centered elementary science textbook model and explore the applicability of the school. For this study we conducted a literature survey and analysis of domestic and foreign books, surveys, and then developed a textbook model of student-centered instruction. We have selected the three elementary school, three grades, fifty-seven students to apply the model developed textbooks. Textbook model of Earth was developed as a center of student activity. Applying the results of development of textbooks in the field, students were interested about the student-centered textbooks and they were felt that the development of textbooks were textbook that students can study on their own. Through this research it could confirm that it should be provided feedback to causes of the reflective thinking of students in the textbook for the development of student-centered textbook.
 Keywords
science textbook;earth science;student-centered instruction;elementary education;reflective thinking;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
김기정, 이항로 김범기(1996). 천문 개념 성취도와 공간 능력과의 상관관계에 관한 연구. 초등과학교육, 15(2), 315-325.

2.
김미영, 김경희(2010). 우리나라, 싱가포르, 대만의 과학 교과서 비교 연구 -생명 영역을 중심으로-. 한국과학교육학회지, 30(4), 498-518.

3.
김지혜, 민병미, 이유미, 손연아, 김동렬, 김태훈(2013). 한국, 일본, 미국의 초등 과학 교과서에 반영된 과학의 본성 내용 비교 분석. 교과교육학연구, 17(2), 619-644.

4.
김효남, 박도영(2009). 한국과 미국의 초등학교 과학교과서 분석. 과학교육연구지, 33(2), 258-270.

5.
명전옥(2001). 예비교사들의 지구과학 문제 해결 실패 요인 : 달과 행성의 운동을 중심으로. 한국지구과학회지, 22(5), 339-349.

6.
배현경, 정공수(2008). 한국과 미국 고등학교 지구과학 교과서의 지질학 탐구활동의 비교 분석. 한국지구과학회지, 29(7), 626-639.

7.
서예원(2007). 한국과 미국의 초등학교 과학 교과서 비교 연구 : 3학년 물질 영역의 과학적 개념 및 탐구 과정을 중심으로. 초등과학교육, 26(5), 509-524.

8.
신동희, 이양락, 이기영, 이은아, 이규석(2005). 지구환경을 고려한 미래 지향적 지구 과학 교육 과정 제안. 한국과학교육학회지, 25(2), 239-259.

9.
이효녕(2011). 2009 개정 과학과 교육과정의 효과적인 실행을 위한 중학생들의 지구계에 대한 이해. 한국지구과학회지, 32(7), 798-808.

10.
이효녕, 권혁수, 박경수, 이현동(2013). 고등학생들의 시스템 사고 측정을 위한 측정도구 개발과 타당화 . 한국과학교육학회지, 33(5), 995-1006.

11.
임영현, 신영준(2014). 초등학교 과학교과서에 기술된 과학이야기에 대한 학생들의 어려움 분석 -6 학년 과학을 중심으로-. 과학교육연구지, 38(3), 525-542.

12.
임청환, 정진우(1993). 국민학교 자연과 천문분야 내용 분석과 문제점. 한국과학교육학회지, 13(2), 247-256.

13.
위수민, 곽정실, 조현준(2008). 초등학교 과학과 지질 단원 교수-학습 활동에서 교사와 학생이 겪는 어려움. 초등과학교육, 27(4), 420-436.

14.
채동현, 현종환, 현동걸, 임성만, 김오범, 한제준(2014). STEAM 프로그램의 초등학교 차시 대체 적용을 위한 개발 방안 모색에 대한 사례 연구. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 7(2), 226-233.

15.
Abell, S., Martini, M., & George, M. (2001). That's what scientists have to do: Preservice elementary teachers' conception of the nature of science during a moon investigation. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1095-1109. crossref(new window)

16.
Chiappetta, E., Fillman, D., & Sethna, G. (1991). A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, pp. 713-725. crossref(new window)

17.
Danver, D., & Kamvounias, P. (2005). Student involvement in assessment: a project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 445-454. crossref(new window)

18.
Gobert, J . D., & Clement, J. J. (1999). Effect of student-generated diagram versus studentgenerated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(1), 39-53.

19.
Hubisz, J. (2003). Middle-school texts don't make the grade. Physics today, 50-54.

20.
Kavanagh, C., Agan, L., & Sneider, C. (2005). Learning about phases of the moon and eclipses: A guide for teachers and curriculum developers. Astronomy Education Review, 4, 19. crossref(new window)

21.
Leite, L. (1999). Heat and temperature: an analysis of how these concepts are dealt with in textbooks. European journal of teacher education, 22, pp. 75-88. crossref(new window)

22.
Plummer, J. D., & Krajcik, J. (2010). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an earth-based perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 768-787. crossref(new window)

23.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Education Psychology, 25, 54-67. crossref(new window)

24.
Shen, J., & Confrey, J. (2010). Justifying alternative models in learning astronomy: A study of K-8 science teachers' understanding of frames of reference. International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 1-29. crossref(new window)

25.
Stoffels, N. T. (2005). "There is a worksheet to be followed": A case study of a science teacher's use of learning support texts for practical work. African journal of research in mathematics, science and technology education, 9, pp.147-157.

26.
Subramaniam, K., & Padalkar, S. (2009). Visualisation and reasoning in explaining the phases of the moon. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 395-417. crossref(new window)

27.
Tatar, M. (2003). The Hard Facts of Grimms' Fairy Tales. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

28.
Tudor, I. (1996). Learner-centeredness as Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

29.
Yang, I., Chae, D., Lim, S., Kwon, S., Kim, E., & Lim, J. (2012). An introducion of Korean elementary science textbook development model 'FLOW' and the feathers of the textbook. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(3), 477-485. crossref(new window)

30.
Zeilik, M., & Bisard, W. (2000). Conceptual change in introductory-level astronomy courses: Tracking misconceptions to reveal which- and how much-concepts change. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29(4), 229-232.