JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Seismic behavior of soft storey mid-rise steel frames with randomly distributed masonry infill
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Seismic behavior of soft storey mid-rise steel frames with randomly distributed masonry infill
Quayyum, Shahriar; Alam, M. Shahria; Rteil, Ahmad;
 Abstract
In this study, the effect of presence and distribution of masonry infill walls on the mid-rise steel frame structures having soft ground storey was evaluated by implementing finite element (FE) methods. Masonry infill walls were distributed randomly in the upper storey keeping the ground storey open without any infill walls, thus generating the worst case scenario for seismic events. It was observed from the analysis that there was an increase in the seismic design forces, moments and base shear in presence of randomly distributed masonry infill walls which underlines that these design values need to be amplified when designing a mid-rise soft ground storey steel frame with randomly distributed masonry infill. In addition, it was found that the overstrength related force modification factor increased and the ductility related force modification factor decreased with the increase in the amount of masonry infilled bays and panels. These must be accounted for in the design of mid-rise steel frames. Based on the FE analysis results on two mid-rise steel frames, design equations were proposed for determining the over strength and the ductility related force modification factors. However, it was recommended that these equations to be generalized for other steel frame structure systems based on an extensive analysis.
 Keywords
seismic behavior;soft ground storey;mid-rise steel frame;masonry infill;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Mathematical micromodeling of infilled frames: State of the art, Engineering Structures, 2013, 56, 1905  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Akkar, S. and Metin, A. (2007), "Assessment of improved nonlinear static procedures in FEMA-440", J. Struct. Eng., 133(9), 1237-1246. crossref(new window)

2.
Alam, M.S., Nehdi, M. and Amanat, K.M. (2009), "Modeling and analysis of retrofitted un-retrofitted masonry-infilled RC Frames under In-Plane Lateral Loading", Struct. Infrastruct. E., 5(2), 71-90. crossref(new window)

3.
Aliaari, M. and Memari, A.M. (2005), "Analysis of masonry infilled steel frames with seismic isolator subframes", Eng. Struct., 27(4), 487-500. crossref(new window)

4.
Aliaari, M. (2005), "The development of Seismic Infill Wall Isolator Subframe (SIWIS) system for use in buildings", Ph. D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

5.
Amanat, K.M. and Hoque, E. (2006), "A rationale for determining the natural period of RC building frames having infill", Eng. Struct., 28(4), 495-502. crossref(new window)

6.
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2000), "Prestandard and commentary on the seismic rehabilitation of buildings", Rep. No. FEMA 356, Washington, D.C.

7.
Bariola, J. (1992), "Drift response of medium-rise reinforced concrete buildings during earthquakes", ACI Struct. J., 89(4), 384-390.

8.
CISC 2006. Handbook of steel construction, Ninth edition, Canadian Institute of Steel Construction (CISC), Toronto, ON.

9.
Crisafulli, F.J. (1997), "Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills", Ph.D. Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.

10.
Dawe, J.L. and Seah, C.K. (1989), "Behavior of masonry infilled steel frames", Can. J. Civil Eng., 16(6), 865-876. crossref(new window)

11.
Dawe, J.L., Schriver, A.B. and Sofocleous, C. (1989), "Masonry infilled steel frames subjected to dynamic load", Can. J. Civil Eng., 16(6), 877-885. crossref(new window)

12.
Dawe, J.L., Liu, Y. and Seah, C.K. (2001), "A parametric study of masonry infilled steel frames", Can. J. Civil Eng., 28(1), 149-157. crossref(new window)

13.
Flanagan, R.D. and Bennett, R.M. (1999), "In-plane behavior of structural clay tile infilled frames", J. Struct. Eng., 125(6), 590-599. crossref(new window)

14.
Ghobarah, A., Saatcioglu, M. and Nistor, I. (2006), "The impact of the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami on structures and infrastructure", Eng. Struct., 28(2), 312-326. crossref(new window)

15.
Humar, J.M., Lau, D. and Pierre, J.R. (2001), "Performance of buildings during the 2001 Bhuj Earthquake", Can. J. Civil Eng., 28(6), 979-991. crossref(new window)

16.
Kaltakci, M.Y., Korkmaz, H.H. and Koken, A. (2007), "An investigation of the behavior of steel frames with masonry infills under lateral loading", J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 2(5), 930-943.

17.
Karakostas, C., Lekidis, V., Makarios, T., Salonikios, T., Sous, I. and Demosthenous, M. (2005), "Seismic response of structures and infrastructure facilities during the Lefakada, Greece Earthquake of 14/8/2003", Eng. Struct., 27(2), 213-227. crossref(new window)

18.
Liauw, T.C. and Kwan, K.H. (1985), "Unified plastic analysis for infilled frames", J. Struct. Eng., 111(7), 1427-1448. crossref(new window)

19.
Loulelis, D., Hatzigeorgiou, G.D. and Beskos, D.E. (2012), "Moment resisting steel frames under repeated Earthquakes", Earthq. Struct., Int. J., 3(3), 231-248. crossref(new window)

20.
Mehrabi, A.B. and Shing, P.B. (1997), "Finite element modeling of masonry infilled RC frame", J. Struct. Eng., 123(5), 604-613. crossref(new window)

21.
Memari, A.M., Aghakouchak, A.A., Ghafory Ashtiany, M. and Tiv, M. (1999), "Full scale dynamic testing of a steel frame building during construction", Eng. Struct., 21(12), 1115-1127. crossref(new window)

22.
Moghaddam, H.A., Mohammadi, M.G.H. and Ghaemian, M. (2006), "Experimental and analytical investigation into crack strength determination of infilled steel frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 62(12), 1341-1352. crossref(new window)

23.
Mohebkhah, A., Tasnimi, A.A. and Moghadam, H. A. (2008), "Nonlinear analysis of masonry-infilled steel frames with openings using discrete element method", J. Constr. Steel Res., 64(12), 1463-1472. crossref(new window)

24.
Mosalam, K.M., White, R.N. and Gergely, P. (1997), "Static response of infilled frames using quasi-static experimentation", J. Struct. Eng., 123(11), 1462-1469. crossref(new window)

25.
NBCC (2005), National Building Code of Canada, Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa.

26.
Papia, M. (1988), "Analysis of infilled frames using coupled finite element and boundary element solution scheme", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 26(3), 731-742. crossref(new window)

27.
Ruiz, S.E. and Diederich, R. (1989), "The Mexico Earthquake of September 19, 1985 - The seismic performance of buildings with weak first storey", Earthquake Spectra, 5(1), 89-102. crossref(new window)

28.
SeismoStruct (2010), SeismoStrcut help file. Available from www.seismsoft.com

29.
Stafford-Smith, B. (1962), "Lateral Stiffness of Infilled Frames", J. Struct. Div., 88(ST6), 183-199.

30.
Stafford-Smith, B. (1966), "Behavior of Square Infilled Frames", J. Struct. Div., 92(ST1), 381-403.