JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The effect of arch geometry on the structural behavior of masonry bridges
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Smart Structures and Systems
  • Volume 16, Issue 6,  2015, pp.1069-1089
  • Publisher : Techno-Press
  • DOI : 10.12989/sss.2015.16.6.1069
 Title & Authors
The effect of arch geometry on the structural behavior of masonry bridges
Altunisik, Ahmet C.; Kanbur, Burcu; Genc, Ali F.;
 Abstract
Arch bridges consist of some important components for structural behavior such as arches, sidewalls, filling materials and foundations. But, arches are the most important part for this type of bridges. For this reason, investigation of arch is come into prominence. In this paper, it is aimed to investigate the arch thickness effect on the structural behavior of masonry arch bridges. For this purpose, Goderni historical arch bridge which was located in Kulp town, Diyarbakir, Turkey and the bridge restoration process has still continued is selected as an application. The construction year of the bridge is not fully known, but the date is estimated to be the second half of the 19th century. The bridge has two arches with the 0.52 cm and 0.69 cm arch thickness, respectively. Finite element model of the bridge is constructed with ANSYS software to reflect the current situation using relievo drawings. Then the arch thickness is changed by increasing and decreasing respectively and finite element models are reconstructed. The structural responses of the bridge are obtained for all arch thickness under dead load and live load. Maximum displacements, maximum-minimum principal stresses and maximum-minimum elastic strains are given with detail using contours diagrams and compared with each other to determine the arch thickness effect. At the end of the study, it is seen that the maximum displacements, tensile stresses and strains have a decreasing trend, but compressive stress and strain have an increasing trend by the increasing of arch thickness.
 Keywords
arch bridge;arch thickness;finite element model;structural response;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Nonlinear seismic performance of a 12th century historical masonry bridge under different earthquake levels, Engineering Failure Analysis, 2017, 79, 408  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Earthquake response of heavily damaged historical masonry mosques after restoration, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2017, 17, 10, 1811  crossref(new windwow)
3.
An Investigation of the Seismic Behaviour of an Ancient Masonry Bastion Using Non-Destructive and Numerical Methods, Experimental Mechanics, 2017, 57, 2, 245  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Altunisik, A.C., Bayraktar, A., Sevim, B. and Birinci, F. (2011), "Vibration-based operational modal analysis of the Mikron historic arch bridge after restoration", Civil Eng. Environ. Syst., 28(3), 247-259. crossref(new window)

2.
ANSYS. (2014), Swanson Analysis System. U.S.A.

3.
Arteaga, I. and Morer, P. (2012), "The effect of geometry on the structural capacity of masonry arch bridges", Constr. Build.Mater., 34, 97-106. crossref(new window)

4.
Bayraktar, A., Altunisik, A.C., Turker, T. and Sevim, B. (2007), "The effect of finite element model updating on earthquake behaviour of historical bridges", Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, October.

5.
Bayraktar, A., Birinci, F., Altunisik, A.C., Turker, T. and Sevim, B. (2009), "Finite element model updating of Senyuva historical arch bridge using ambient vibration tests", Baltic J. Road Bridge Eng., 4(4), 177-185. crossref(new window)

6.
Bayraktar, A., Altunisik, A.C., Birinci, F., Sevim, B. and Turker, T. (2010), "Finite element analysis and vibration testing of a two-span masonry arch bridge", J. Perform. Constr. Fac., 24(1), 46-52. crossref(new window)

7.
Brencich, A. and Sabia, D. (2008), "Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: The Tanaro Bridge", Constr. Build. Mater., 22, 2087-2099. crossref(new window)

8.
Cancelliere, I., Imbimbo, M. and Sacco, E. (2010), "Experimental tests and numerical modeling of reinforced masonry arches", Eng. Struct., 32, 776-792. crossref(new window)

9.
Caporale, A., Feo, L., Hui, D. and Luciano, R. (2014), "Debonding of FRP in multi-span masonry arch structures via limit analysis", Compos. Struct., 108, 856-865. crossref(new window)

10.
Cakir, F. and Uysal, H. (2014), "Experimental modal analysis of brick masonry arches strengthened prepreg composites", J. Cultural Heritage, DOI:10.1016/j.culher.2014.06.003. crossref(new window)

11.
Frunzio, G., Monaco, M. and Gesualdo, A. (2001), "3D FEM analysis of a Roman Arch Bridge", Historical Constr., 591-598.

12.
Oliveira, D.V., LourenCo, P.B. and Lemos, C. (2010), "Geometric issues and ultimate load capacity of masonry arch bridges from the northwest Iberian Peninsula", Eng. Struct., 32, 3955-3965. crossref(new window)

13.
Pela, L., Aprile, A. and Benedetti, A. (2013), "Comparison of seismic assessment procedures for masonry arch bridges", Constr. Build. Mater., 38, 381-394. crossref(new window)

14.
Sayin, E., Karaton, M., YOn, B. and Calayir, Y. (2011), "Nonlinear dynamic analysis of historical Uzunok Bridge considering soil-structure interaction", Proceedings of the 1st Earthquake Engineering and Seismology Conference in Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.

15.
Sevim, B., Bayraktar, A., Altunisik, A.C., Atamturktur, S. and Birinci, F. (2011), "Assessment of nonlinear seismic performance of a restored historical arch bridge using ambient vibrations", Nonlinear Dynam., 63(4), 755-770. crossref(new window)

16.
Tao, Y., Stratford, T.J. and Chen, J.F. (2011), "Behaviour of a masonry arch bridge repaired using fibre-reinforced polymer composites", Eng. Struct., 33, 1594-1606. crossref(new window)

17.
Toker, S. and Unay, A.I. (2004), "Mathematical modeling and finite element analysis of masonry arch bridges", J. Sci. Gazi Univ., 17(2), 129-139.

18.
Ural, A., Oruc, S., Dogangun, A. and Tuluk, O.I. (2008), "Turkish historical arch bridges and their deteriorations and failures", Eng. Fail. Anal., 15, 43-53. crossref(new window)