JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Cone penetrometer incorporated with dynamic cone penetration method for investigation of track substructures
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Smart Structures and Systems
  • Volume 18, Issue 2,  2016, pp.197-216
  • Publisher : Techno-Press
  • DOI : 10.12989/sss.2016.18.2.197
 Title & Authors
Cone penetrometer incorporated with dynamic cone penetration method for investigation of track substructures
Hong, Won-Taek; Byun, Yong-Hoon; Kim, Sang Yeob; Lee, Jong-Sub;
 Abstract
The increased speed of a train causes increased loads that act on the track substructures. To ensure the safety of the track substructures, proper maintenance and repair are necessary based on an accurate characterization of strength and stiffness. The objective of this study is to develop and apply a cone penetrometer incorporated with the dynamic cone penetration method (CPD) for investigating track substructures. The CPD consists of an outer rod for dynamic penetration in the ballast layer and an inner rod with load cells for static penetration in the subgrade. Additionally, an energy-monitoring module composed of strain gauges and an accelerometer is connected to the head of the outer rod to measure the dynamic responses during the dynamic penetration. Moreover, eight strain gauges are installed in the load cells for static penetration to measure the cone tip resistance and the friction resistance during static penetration. To investigate the applicability of the developed CPD, laboratory and field tests are performed. The results of the CPD tests, i.e., profiles of the corrected dynamic cone penetration index (CDI), profiles of the cone tip and friction resistances, and the friction ratio are obtained at high resolution. Moreover, the maximum shear modulus of the subgrade is estimated using the relationships between the static penetration resistances and the maximum shear modulus obtained from the laboratory tests. This study suggests that the CPD test may be a useful method for the characterization of track substructures.
 Keywords
dynamic penetration;shear modulus;static penetration;track substructures;transferred energy;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Al-Qadi, I.L., Xie, W., Roberts, R. and Leng, Z. (2010), "Data analysis techniques for GPR used for assessing railroad ballast in high radio-frequency environment", J. Transportation Eng. - ASCE, 136(4), 392-399. crossref(new window)

2.
Anbazhagan, P., Lijun, S., Buddihima, I. and Cholachat, R. (2011), "Model track studies on fouled ballast using ground penetrating radar and multichannel analysis of surface wave", J. Appl. Geophys., 74, 175-184. crossref(new window)

3.
ASTM D4633 (2005), "Standard test method for energy measurement for dynamic penetrometers", Annual Book of ASTM Standard, 04.08, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

4.
ASTM D6951 (2009), "Standard test method for use of the dynamic cone penetrometer in shallow pavement applications", Annual Book of ASTM Standard, 04.03, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

5.
Bemben, S.M. and Myers, H.J. (1974), "The influence of rate of penetration on static cone resistance in connecticut river valley varved clay", Proceedings of the European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Stockholm, 33-34.

6.
Byun, Y.H., Kim, J.H. and Lee, J.S. (2013), "Cone penetrometer with a helical-type outer screw rod for evaluation of the subgrade condition", J. Transportation Eng. - ASCE, 139, 115-122. crossref(new window)

7.
Carpenter, D., Jackson, P.J. and Jay, A. (2004), "Enhancement of the GPR method of railway trackbed investigation by the installation of radar detectable geosynthetics", NDT & E Int., 37, 95-103. crossref(new window)

8.
Chebli, H., Clouteau, D. and Schmitt, L. (2008), "Dynamic response of high-speed ballasted railway tracks: 3D periodic model and in situ measurements", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 28, 118-131. crossref(new window)

9.
Cho, G.C., Lee, J.S. and Santamarina, J.C. (2004), "Spatial variability in soils: High resolution assessment with electrical needle probe", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 130(8), 843-850. crossref(new window)

10.
Clark, M., McCann, D.M. and Forde, M.C. (2002), "Infrared thermographic investigation of railway track ballast", NDT & E Int., 35, 83-94. crossref(new window)

11.
Correia, A.G., Martins, J., Caldeira, L., Neves, D., Maranha, E. and Delgado, J. (2009), "Comparison of in situ performance-based tests methods to evaluate moduli of railway embankments", In Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields. 8th International Conference, IL, 1331-1340.

12.
De Lima, D.C. and Tumay, M.T. (1991), "Scale effects in cone penetration tests", Proceedings of the Geotechnical Engineering Congress, Boulder, Colorado.

13.
Gallagher, G.P., Leiper, Q., Wiliamson, R., Clark, M.R. and Forde, M.C. (1999), "The application of time domain ground penetrating radar to evaluate railway track ballast", NDT & E Int., 32, 463-468. crossref(new window)

14.
Hugenschmidt, J. (2000), "Railway track inspection using GPR", J. Appl. Geophys., 43, 147-155. crossref(new window)

15.
Kim, K., Prezzi, M., Salgado, R. and Lee, W. (2008), "Effect of Penetration rate on cone penetration resistance in saturated clayey soils", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 134(8), 1142-1153. crossref(new window)

16.
Kim, R., Lee, W. and Lee, J.S. (2010), "Temperature-compensated cone penetration test mini-cone using fiber optic sensors", Geotech. Test. J., 33(3), 243-252.

17.
Lee, C., Lee, J.S., An, S. and Lee, W. (2010), "Effect of secondary impacts on SPT rod energy and sampler penetration", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 136(3), 522-526. crossref(new window)

18.
Lee, J.S. and Santamarina, J.C. (2005), "Bender element: Performance and signal interpretation", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 131(9), 1063-1070. crossref(new window)

19.
Lee, W., Shin, D.H., Yoon, H.K. and Lee, J.S. (2009), "Micro-cone penetrometer for more concise subsurface layer detection", Geotech. Testing Journal, ASTM, 32(4), 358-364.

20.
Lunne, T., Robertson, P.K. and Powell, J.J.M. (1997), Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice, Blackie Academic & Professional, London, 352.

21.
McHenry, M.T. and Rose, J.G. (2012), Railroad subgrade support and performance indicators: a review of available laboratory and in-situ testing methods, Department of Civil Engineering and Kentucky Transportation Center, University of Kentucky, KY, 39.

22.
Pile Dynamics Inc. (2000), PDA-W Users manual, OH.

23.
Sancio, R.B. and Bray, J. (2005). "An assessment of the effect of rod length on SPT energy calculations based on measured field data", Geotech. Testing Journal, ASTM, 28(1), 1-9.

24.
Santamarina, J.C. and Fratta, D. (1998), Introduction to discrete signals and inverse problems in civil Engineering, ASCE Press, Virginia, 327.

25.
Seed, H.B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L.F. and Chung, R.M. (1985), "Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluation", J. Geotech. Eng., 111(12), 1425-1445. crossref(new window)

26.
Skempton, A.W. (1986), "Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, ageing and overconsolidation", Geotechnique, 36(3), 425-447. crossref(new window)

27.
Tumay, M.T., Kurup, P.U. and Boggess, R.L. (1998), "A continuous intrusion electronic miniature cone penetration test (CIM-CPT) system for site characterization", Proceedings of the International Conference on Site Characterization 98, Atlanta, GA.

28.
Vo, P.T., Ngo, H.H., Guo, W., Zhou, J.L., Listowski, A., Du, B., Wei, Q. and Bui, X. T. (2015), "Stormwater quality management in rail transportation - Past, present and future", Sci. Total Environ., 512-513, 353-363. crossref(new window)

29.
Yoon, H.K., Jung, S.H. and Lee, J.S. (2011), "Characterization of subsurface spatial variability by cone resistivity penetrometer", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 31(7), 1064-1071. crossref(new window)

30.
Yoon, H.K. and Lee, J.S. (2012), "Microcones configured with full-bridge circuits", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 41, 119-127.