JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Study on Developing Facets for Subject Headings in Korea
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Study on Developing Facets for Subject Headings in Korea
Choi, Yoon Kyung; Chung, Yeon-Kyoung;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The subject heading is an elaborate access tool for subject browsing and searching in information retrieval environment. The purpose of this study is to suggest the applicable facets to subject headings in Korea. First, the concepts of subject and the definitions of facets were investigated in the literature review. Second, six cases including OCLC`s FAST, PRECIS, "Thesaurus construction and use", CC edition, BC Edition, and UDC Edition were analyzed to focus on configuration of facets as case studies. Based on the results, twenty-two facets were proposed including Topical, Event, Geography, Chronology, Personal and Corporate Name, Title, Form, Genre, Language, and Person facets as 11 top facets. Also, Topical-Thing/Entity and Topical-Action/Status, Part, Kind, Property, Whole, Material, Patient, Product, By-Product and Agent facets as sub-facets of Topical facet.
 Keywords
Subject Access;Subject Heading;Thesaurus;Classification;Facet;Aboutness;Isness;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
김태수. 1997. 주제명표목의 구조에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 14(1): 77-105.(Kim, Tae-Soo. 1997. "A Study on the Structure of the Subject Headings." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 14(1): 77-105.)

2.
남태우, 유광연. 2005. 블리스(Bliss)의 서지 분류법에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 22(2): 57-85.(Nam, Tae-Woo and Yoo, Kwang-Yeon. 2005. "A Study on Bliss's Bibliographic Classification." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(2): 57-85.)

3.
박지영. 2010. 시소러스를 연계한 문학류 패싯 분류체계 개발. 한국비블리아학회지, 21(3): 77-89.(Park, Ziyoung. 2010. "Developing a Faceted Classification Scheme Integrated with a Thesaurus for Literature." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 21(3): 77-89.)

4.
백지원, 정연경. 2014. 국립중앙도서관 주제명표목표 검색 시스템 개선 방안에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(1): 31-51.(Baek, Ji-Won and Chung, Yeon-Kyoung. 2014. "A Study on Improving Access & Retrieval System of the National Library of Korea Subject Headings." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(1): 31-51.)

5.
손대형, 김태수. 1998. 패싯분류체계를 이용한 시소러스작성에 관한 연구. 한국정보관리학회 제5 회 학술대회 논문집, 235-238.(Son, Dae-Hyung and Kim, Tae-Soo. 1998. "A Study on Thesaurus Construction Using Facet Classification." In Proceedings of the 5th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 235-238.)

6.
유영준. 2006. 고전 용어 시소러스의 분류 체계에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(2): 415-434.(Yoo, Yeong-Jun. 2006. "A Study on Classification System of Korean Literatures Thesaurus." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(2): 415-434.)

7.
유영준. 2008. 신학 용어 분류를 위한 패싯 설계에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(3): 259-279.(Yoo, Yeong-Jun. 2008. "Establishing Facet for Classifying Theological Terms." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(3): 259-279.)

8.
이승민. 2010. 시소러스 통합을 위한 개념기반 패싯 프레임워크 구축. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 41(3): 1-22.(Lee, Seungmin. 2010. "Construction of the Concept-Based Faceted Framework for Thesaurus Integration." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(3): 1-22.)

9.
정연경. 2013. 한식 정보 조직을 위한 패싯 구조화에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(1): 15-37.(Chung, Yeon-Kyoung. 2013. "A Study on Structure of a Faceted Classification for Organizing Korean Food Information." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(1): 15-37.)

10.
황순희, 윤애선. 2005. 의미적 준거의 세목화를 고려한 과학기술 분야 시소러스 구축. 한국어 의미학, 18: 99-124.(Hwang, Soonhee and Yoon, Aesun. 2005. "Building Thesaurus for Science & Technology Domains with Specification of Semantic Standards." Korean Semantics, 18: 99-124.)

11.
Aitchison, J., Gilchrist, A. and Bawden, D. 2000. Thesaurus Construction and Use: A Practical Manual. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers.

12.
Anderson, J. D. and Hofmann, M. A. 2006. "A Fully Faceted Syntax for Library of Congress Subject Headings." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 43(1): 7-38. crossref(new window)

13.
Austin, D. 1984. PRECIS: A Manual of Concept Analysis and Subject Indexing. London: The British Library.

14.
Beghtol, C. 1995. "'Facets' as Interdisciplinary Undiscovered Public Knowledge: S. R. Ranganathan in India and L. Guttman in Israel." Journal of Documentation, 51(3): 194-224. crossref(new window)

15.
Broughton, V. 2001. "Faceted Classification as a Basis for Knowledge Organization in a Digital Environment: The Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a Model for Vocabulary Management and the Creation of Multidimensional Knowledge Structures." The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 7(1): 67-102. crossref(new window)

16.
Broughton, V. 2006. "The Need for a Faceted Classification as the Basis of All Methods of Information Retrieval." Aslib Proceedings, 58(1/2): 49-72. crossref(new window)

17.
Broughton, V. 2010. "Concepts and Terms in the Faceted Classification: The Case of UDC." Knowledge Organization, 37(4): 270-279.

18.
British Standards Institution. 2005. Universal Decimal Classification: Standard Edition. London: British Standards Institution.

19.
Cathleen, W. 1989. "Faceted Classification in the Art and Architecture Thesaurus." Art Documentation, Winter: 175-177.

20.
Chan, L. M. 2005. Library of Congress Subject Headings: Principles and Application. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.

21.
Chan, L. M. et al. 2001. "A Faceted Approach to Subject Data in the Dublin Core Metadata Record." Journal of Internet Cataloging, 4(1/2): 35-47. crossref(new window)

22.
Chan, L. M. and O'Neill, E. T. 2010. FAST, Faceted Application of Subject Terminology: Principles and Applications. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited.

23.
Chu, H. 2001. Information Representation and Retrieval in the Digital Age. 장혜란 역. 2011. 디지털 시대의 정보 표현과 검색. 서울: 한국도서관협회.

24.
Dalrymple, P. W. and Younger, J. A. 1991. "From Authority Control to Informed Retrieval: Framing the Expanded Domain of Subject Access." College & Research Libraries, 52: 139-149. crossref(new window)

25.
Franklin, R. A. 2003. "Re-Inventing Subject Access for the Semantic Web." Online Information Review, 27(2): 94-101. crossref(new window)

26.
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. 2011. Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data: A Conceptual Model. Hague, Netherlands: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. [online] [cited 2014. 7. 30.]

27.
Jin, Q. 2008. "Is FAST the Right Direction For a New System of Subject Cataloging and Metadata?" Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 45(3): 91-110. crossref(new window)

28.
Langridege, D. W. 1989. Subject Analysis: Principles and Procedures. London: Bowker-Saur Ltd.

29.
La Barre, K. 2010. "Facet Analysis." Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44: 243-284. crossref(new window)

30.
Leong, J. H. 2010. "The Convergence of Metadata and Bibliographic Control?: Trends and Patterns in Addressing the Current Issues and Challenges of Providing Subject Access." Knowledge Organization, 37(1): 29-42.

31.
Mixter, J. and Childress, E. R. 2013. FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) Users: Summary and Case Studies. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. [online] [cited 2014. 8. 20.]

32.
O'Neill, E. T. and Chan, L. M. 2003. "FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology): A Simplified Vocabulary Based on the Library of Congress Subject Headings." IFLA Journal, 29: 6-12.

33.
Pettee, J. 1946. Subject Headings: The History and Theory of the Alphabetical Subject Approach to Books. New York: H. W. Wilson Company.

34.
Raju, A. A. N. 2007. Universal Decimal Classification (IME-1993) (Theory and Practice): A Self Instructional Manual. New Delhi: Ess Ess Publications.

35.
Ranganathan, S. R. 1959. Elements of Library Classification. London: Association of Assistant Libraries.

36.
Ranganathan, S. R. 1967. Prolegomena to Library Classification. New York: Asia Publishing House.

37.
Richmond, P. A. 1981. Introduction to PRECIS for North American Usage. Littleton, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.

38.
Satija, M. P. and Singh, J. 2013. "Colon Classification: A Requiem." Journal of Library & Information Technology, 33(4): 265-276.

39.
Spietri, L. F. 1997. "The Use of Facet Analysis in Information Retrieval Thesauri: An Examination of Selected Guidelines for Thesaurus Construction." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 25(1): 21-37.

40.
Spiteri, L. F. 1999. "The Essential Elements of Faceted Thesauri." Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 28(4): 31-52.

41.
Svenonius, E. 2000. The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

42.
Taylor, A. G. 2004. The Organization of Information. Westport, Conn: Libraries Unlimited.

43.
Vickery, B. C. 1960. Faceted Classification: A Guide to Construction and Use of Special Schemes. London: Aslib.

44.
Walsh, J. 2011. "The Use of Library of Congress Subject Headings in Digital Collections." Library Review, 60(4): 328-343. crossref(new window)

45.
Zavalina, O. L. 2012. "Subject Access: Conceptual Models, Functional Requirements, and Empirical Data." Journal of Library Metadata, 12: 140-163. crossref(new window)