JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Developing a Roadmap for National Research Data Management Governance: Based on the Analysis of United Kingdom`s Case
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Developing a Roadmap for National Research Data Management Governance: Based on the Analysis of United Kingdom`s Case
Shim, Wonsik;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In recent years, countries such as USA, United Kingdom and Australia have begun to implement national policies in order to systematically manage and share research data produced through publicly funded research. However, Korea as of yet does not have a coordinated research data policy. The lack of infrastructure that supports the sharing and preserving research data results in the poor management and loss of valuable data produced from significant national R&D investments. The need for research data collection, management and sharing goes beyond the outcome assessment of national research: it facilitates the diffusion of research impact and economic development. There is a growing recognition that data sharing is an essential element of research ethics. This research investigates the relevant research data policies and methods of governance at the national level using a case study analysis. United Kingdom was selected as a case study target as it shows a wide variety of policy examples and instruments. In particular, this research focuses on the UK`s national legal framework for research data sharing, analyzes the RCUK (Research Councils UK)`s data policies, activities at the seven research councils under RCUK as well as several supporting institutions. Based on the analyses, this research offers a national roadmap for better managing and sharing of research data in Korea.
 Keywords
Research Data;Data Management;United Kingdom;Case Study;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
강희종. 2012. 21세기 핵심자원, 국가과학데이터 활용을 위한 정책 과제. STEPI Insight, 91: 1-26.(Kang, Hee-Jong. 2012. "Key Resources in 21st Century, Policy Tasks on Use of National Scientific Data." STEPI Insight, 91: 1-26.)

2.
김선태 외. 2010. 과학데이터 보존 및 활용모델에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 21(4): 81-93.(Kim, Sun-Tae et al. 2010. "A Study on a Model for Using and Preserving Scientific Data." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 21(4): 81-93.)

3.
김은정, 남태우. 2012. 연구데이터 수집에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석. 정보관리학회지, 29(2): 27-44.(Kim, Eun-Jeong and Nam, Tae-Woo. 2012. "Factor Analysis of Effects on Research Data Collection." Journal of the Korea Society for Information Management, 29(2): 27-44.)

4.
김지현. 2012. 대학 내 연구자들의 연구데이터 관리에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 43(3): 433-455.(Kim, Ji-Hyun. 2012. "A Study on University Researchers' Data Management Practices." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(3): 433-455.)

5.
김지현. 2013. 국외 정부연구비지원기관의 연구데이터 관리정책 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(3): 251-274.(Kim, Ji-Hyun. 2013. "An Analysis of Data Management Policies of Governmental Funding Agencies in the U.S., the U.K., Canada and Australia." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(3): 251-274.)

6.
김현희 외. 2005. 국가지식정보의 효율적인 유통체제 구축을 위한 대학 리포지토리의 운영 모형 개발: dCollection을 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 22(3): 103-127.(Kim, Hyun-Hee et al. 2005. "Implementing the Management Model of the Institutional Repositories for the Efficient Distribution Infrastructure of National Knowledge Focusing on the dCollection System." Journal of the Korea Society for Information Management, 22(3): 103-127.)

7.
김현희, 정경희, 김용호. 2006. 대학 기관 리포지토리의 운영 현황 분석 및 개선 방안에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(4): 17-39.(Kim, Hyun-Hee, Joung, Kyoung-Hee and Kim, Yong-Ho. 2006. "A Study on the Improvement of University Institutional Repositories (dCollection) based on Its Current State." Journal of the Korea Society for Information Management, 23(4): 17-39.)

8.
노영희, 박홍석, 이수지. 2008. 국가학술자원관리시스템구축 계획에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 25(1): 99-127.(Noh, Young-Hee, Park, Hong-Seok and Lee, Soo-Ji. 2008. "A Study on Implementing a National Academic Resources Management System in Korea." Journal of the Korea Society for Information Management, 25(1): 99-127.)

9.
신영란, 정연경. 2012. 국내 인문사회 연구데이터 아카이브의 개선방안에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(3): 93-115.(Shin, Young-Ran and Chung, Yeon-Kyoung. 2012. "A Study on the Improvement Plans of the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Data Archives in Korea." Journal of Records Management & Archives Society of Korea, 12(3): 93-115.)

10.
신은자. 2015. 디지털 시대 오픈 데이터 정책의 현황과 과제. 정보관리학회지, 32(3): 49-68.(Shin, Eun-Ja. 2015. "An Analysis on Trends and Tasks of Open Data Policy in the Digital Era." Journal of the Korea Society for Information Management, 32(3): 49-68.)

11.
안영희, 박옥화. 2010. 디지털 큐레이션 정책을 위한 프레임워크 개발. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 41(1): 167-186.(Ahn, Young-Hee and Park, Ok-Wha. 2010. "Development of a Framework for Digital Curation Policy." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(1): 167-186.)

12.
윤종민, 김규빈. 2013. 과학데이터에 관한 입법례와 관리정책 그리고 대응방안. 기술혁신학회지, 16(1): 63-100.(Yoon, Chong-min and Kim, Kyubin. 2013. "Legislation Cases, Management Policies and Countermeasures on Scientific Data: Focusing Australia, the United States and China." Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 16(1): 63-100.)

13.
장금연. 2004. 학술정보유통을 위한 레포지터리 적용 방안 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 38(4): 291-310.(Jang, Kum-Yeoun. 2004. "A Study on Repository Construction Scheme for Scholarly Communication." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(4): 291-310.)

14.
한국과학기술정보연구원. 2012. 국가 과학데이터 공유․활용체제 구축. 서울: 교육과학기술부.(Korean Institute of Science and Technology Information. 2012. A Development on the Scientific Data Sharing and Utilizing System. Seoul: Ministry of Education.)

15.
황혜경, 김혜선, 최선희. 2004. 연구정보자원으로서의 기관 레포지터리 구축 현황과 과제. 한국비블리아 발표논집, 10: 77-102.(Hwang, Hye-Kyong, Kim, Hye-Sun and Choi, Seon-Heui. 2004. "Yeongujeongbojawoneuroseoui Gigwan Repojiteo-ri Guchuk Hyeonhwanggwa Gwaje." Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science Occasional Papers Series, 10: 77-102.)

16.
황혜경, 이지연. 2009. 오픈액세스기반 기관리포지터리 성공에 미치는 요인 분석. 정보관리학회지, 26(4): 35-57.(Hwang, Hye-Kyong and Lee, Jee-Yeon. 2009. "Analyzing the Factors Affecting the Successful Deployment of the Open Source Based Institutional Repositories." Journal of the Korea Society for Information Management, 26(4): 35-57.)

17.
Bolikowski, L. et al. 2015. "Data as "First-class Citizens" (Guest Editorial)." D-Lib Magazine, 21(1/2). [online] [cited 2015. 10. 12.]

18.
Bouman, G. D. and Ling, R. 2004. The Research Process. South Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.

19.
Jubb, M. 2007. "UK Research Funders' Policies for the Management of Information Outputs." International Journal of Digital Curation, 2(1): 29-48. [online] [cited 2015. 10. 12.] crossref(new window)

20.
Jones, S. 2009. A Report on the Range of Policies Required for and Related to Digital Curation. Glasgow: Digital Curation Centre.

21.
Jones, S. 2012. "Developments in Research Funder Data Policy." International Journal of Data Curation, 7(1): 114-125. [online] [cited 2015. 10. 12.] crossref(new window)

22.
Mulligan, H. 2014. Briefing - Freedom of Information: New Rules on Datasets. London: Farrer & Co. [online] [cited 2015. 10. 12.]

23.
National Science Foundation. 2011. Digital Research Data Sharing and Management. Arlington, US: National Science Foundation.

24.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2007. OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding. Danvers, USA: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. [online] [cited 2015. 10. 12.]

25.
Research Councils UK. 2015. RCUK Common Principles on Data Policy. Swindon, UK: Research Councils UK. [online] [cited 2015. 10. 12.]

26.
Treloar, A. 2009. "Design and Implementation of the Australian National Data Service." International Journal of Digital Curation, 4(1): 125-137. [online] [cited 2015. 10. 12.] crossref(new window)