JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Study on the Types of Love in and : Focusing on Plato`s Theory of Eros
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Cartoon and Animation Studies
  • Volume , Issue ,  2016, pp.1-22
  • Publisher : Korean Society of Cartoon and Animation Studies
  • DOI : 10.7230/KOSCAS.2016.43.001
 Title & Authors
A Study on the Types of Love in and : Focusing on Plato`s Theory of Eros
Kim, Min-Kyu;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
So far, the Studio Ghibli`s major masterpieces, and have been studied extensively from mythical and psychological perspectives due to the films` intrinsic symbolism within their characters and events. However, there have been insufficient in-depth research on the types of love the two works have. Therefore, this study will focus on how the types of love in the two animations mirror the concept of love in Plato`s theory of Eros through the analysis of two films` characters. The desire for memory and recovery can be seen in , and glimpses of each phase of aim towards changes in physical appearance can be shown in . These describe the function and the purpose of Eros that Plato states in Socrates` terms in Phaedrus and Symposium. Plato ultimately defined Eros as a spirit that leads to the world of Ideas and suggested the five stages of love that are divided in accordance with the ultimate purpose and attitude of mankind towards Eros. The cognition area, changes in appearance of the characters and spatial ranks in and critically reveal such core concepts of the theory of Eros. It is noteworthy that the two works show the origin of the most universal ideology of the West. These two animation films are particularly significant in terms of that they reflect the western epistemology while covering exclusive and covert ethnic emotions.
 Keywords
Studio Ghibli;;;Plato;Eros;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
박영식, 플라톤 철학의 이해, 정음사, 1992, p.89.

2.
안더스 니그렌, 아가페와 에로스, 고구경 옮김, 크리스챤다이제스트, 2013, p.174.

3.
조셉 캠벨, 천의 얼굴을 가진 영웅, 이윤기 옮김, 민음사, 2013, p.121.

4.
토마스L, 쿡시, 플라톤의 향연 입문, 김영균 옮김, 서광사, 2013, p.232.

5.
플라톤, 소크라테스의 변명, 파이돈, 크리톤, 향연, 황문수 옮김, 문예출판사, 2004, p.117.

6.
플라톤, 파이드로스, 조대호 역해, 문예출판사, 2004, p.77.

7.
플라톤, 향연, 강철웅 옮김, 이제이북스, 2014, pp.143-144.

8.
강효정, 애니메이션 캐릭터를 대상으로 한 프로이트의 정신분석학 적용 연구, 애니메이션연구, 2005, pp29-46.

9.
김재웅, 애니메이션의 역사적 양식에 대한 연구: 개인양식과 미국의 디즈니, 일본의 지브리 양식을 중심으로, 만화애니메이션연구, 통권제8호(2009), pp49-65.

10.
오동일, 지브리 스튜디오 애니메이션의 함축적 표현에 관한 연구, 기초조형학연구, vol15, No.6, 2014, pp357-366.

11.
장동렬, 애니메이션 영상화면에 나타난 카메라의 구도적 관점 - 비언어 커뮤니케이션을 중심으로, 만화애니메이션연구, 통권제32호(2013), pp127-152.