JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effects of Gait Training Using Functional Electrical Stimulation on Stroke Patients' Balance and Gait Velocity
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effects of Gait Training Using Functional Electrical Stimulation on Stroke Patients' Balance and Gait Velocity
Kang, Kwon-Young; Choi, Wan-Suk; An, Ho-Jung; Koo, Ja-Pung; Lee, Joon-Hee; Yun, Young-Dae; Lee, Jung-Sook; Jung, Joung-Youl; Lee, Sang-Bin;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of gait training using functional electrical stimulation on the improvement of hemiplegic patients' functions for balance and gait velocity. The subjects of the experiment were determined to be 10 each hemiplegic patients who had been diagnosed with stroke or brain damage six months or longer earlier assigned to an experimental group and a control group respectively. The subjects were evaluated before the experiment using Tetrax and 10M gait tests, received gait training five times a week for four weeks using functional electrical stimulation and were evaluated after the experiment in the same method as used in the evaluation before the experiment. In order to examine differences between the experimental group that received gait training using functional electrical stimulation and the control group that was treated by functional electrical stimulation and received gait training thereafter, differences between before and after the experiment were analyzed using paired sample t-tests and differences in changes after the experiment between the experimental group and the control group were analyzed using independent sample t-tests in order to compare the two groups with each other. Experimental results showed significant differences in weight bearing, balance and gait velocity between before and after the experiment in the experimental group(p<.05). In the control group, whereas weight bearing and gait velocity did not show any significant difference between before and after the experiment(p>.05), balance showed significant differences(p<.05). Weight bearing, balance and gait velocity change rates showed significant differences between the experimental group and the control group(p<.05). In conclusion, it was indicated that gait training using functional electrical stimulation is effective for enhancing stroke patients' weight bearing rates, balance abilities and gait velocity.
 Keywords
Back pain;LLD;Muscle Power;Flexibility;Spinal Decompression Therapy;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scales for stroke patient. Phys Ther 1985; 65(2); 175- 180.

2.
Di fabio RP, Badke MB. Relationships of sensory organization to balance function in patients with hemiplegia. Phys Ther 1990; 70; 542-548.

3.
Seliktar R, Susak Z, Najenson T, Solzi P. Dynamic feature of standing and their correlation with neurological disorders. Scand J Rehab Med 1978; 10; 59-64.

4.
Wu SH, Huang HT, Lin C, Chen MH. Effects of a program on symetrical posture in patient with hemiplegia. Am J Occup Ther 1995; 50; 17-23.

5.
Kottke FJ, Stilwell GK, Lenmann JF. Krusen's handbook physical medicine and rehabilitation W. B. saunders co, philadelphia 1982; 86-100.

6.
Burridge JH, Taylor PN, Hagan SA, et al. Exerience of clinical use of the odstock dropped foot stimulator. Artif Organs 1997; 21(3); 254-260. crossref(new window)

7.
Eggers U. Occupalional theraphy in the treatment of hemiplegia. 1st ed, Rockville, Maryland, Aspen 1984.

8.
Charness A. Stroke/Head injury. Aspen Publisher 1986.

9.
Yun SH. Rehabilitation of paretic extremities by functional electrical stimulation(FES). The Journal of the College of Medicine, Chungnam National University 1994; 21(1); 267-276.

10.
Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Gait velocity over 10meter overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15; 415-421. crossref(new window)

11.
Kim BO, Mo JW, Jeong HS, Kim BS. The effect of functional(FES) treatment on hemiplegic gaits. The Journal of the College of Medicine, Chungnam National University 1996; 23(1); 217-222.

12.
Davies PM. Steps to Follow. A Guide to the Treatment of Adult Hemiplegia. Berlin. Springer- Verlag 1985.

13.
Keenan MA, Perry J, Jordan C. Factors affecting balance and ambulation following stroke. Clin Orthop and Rel Res 1984; 182; 165-171.

14.
Dickstein R, Nissan M, Pillar T, Scheer D. Footground pressure pattern of standing hemiplegic patients: Major characteristics and patterns of improvement. Phys Ther 1984; 64; 19-23.

15.
Bogata U, Gros N, Kljajic M, et al. The rehabilitoon of gait in patients with hemiplegia: a comparison between conventional therapy and multichannel functional electrical stimulation therapy. Phys Ther 1995; 75; 490-502.

16.
Bohannon RW, Larkin PA. Lower extremity weight bearing under various standing conditions in independently ambulatory patients with hemiparesis. Phys Ther 1985; 65; 1323-1325.

17.
Liberson WT, Holmquest HJ, Scott D, Dow M. Functional electrotherapy stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronised with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patient. Arch Phy Med Rehabil 1961; 42: 101.

18.
Stanic U, Acimovic-Janezic R. Gros N, Trnkoczy A, Bajd T. Multichnnel electrical stimulation for correction of hemiplegia gait. Scand J Rehabil Med 1978: 10; 75-95.

19.
Bogata U, Gros N, Malezic M, Kelih B, Klkjajic M, Acimovic R. Restoration of gait during two to three weeks of therapy with multichannel electrical stimulation. Phys Ther 1989; 69; 319-327.

20.
Water RL. The enigma of "carry over". Int Rehabil Med 1984; 6(1); 9-11.

21.
Granat MT, Maxwell DJ, Ferguson ACB, et al. Peroneal stimulator: Evaluation for the correction of spastic drop foot in hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:19-24. crossref(new window)