JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Study on the Transition and Classification of Somatotyping
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Study on the Transition and Classification of Somatotyping
Choi, Wan Suk; Moon, Ok Kon; Choi, Jung Hyun; Kim, Bo Kyoung; Wang, Joong San; Kim, Hong Rae; Park, Joo Hyun; Song, Young Hwa; Hwang, Hyun Sook; Kim, Soon Hee;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Experts of medicine, philosophy and psychology found that human somatotypes were related to personality or physical characteristics and classified somatotypes into various forms. This study explored the changes and types of somatotyping methods from Before Christ to present day and identified the status of studies of somatotypes in the area of physical therapy. This study covered the methods applied in various majors with a focus on those provided in books and papers of Heath BH. and Carter JEL. Based on the results, there are officially twelve assessment methods. Currently, the method of Heath & Carter is most widely applied. Somatotypes are studied in many areas. It is actively explored in the area of pain physical therapy, thermotherapy and integumentary physical therapy. Also, the soft tissue physical therapy area seeks interdisciplinary studies. This study found that there were various assessment methods in diverse areas. It is likely that continuous studies will develop new assessment methods. It is hoped that in the area of physical therapy, somatotypes shall be applied more amply.
 Keywords
Somatotype;Somatotyping;Physical Therapy;Assessment Method;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Buffa R, Lodde M, Floris G, Zaru C, Putzu PF, Marini E. Somatotype in Alzheimer's disease. Gerontology 2007; 53: 200-204.

2.
Saitoglu M, Ardicoglu O, Ozgocmen S, Kamanli A, Kaya A. Osteoporosis risk factors and association with somatotypes in males. Arch Med Res 2007 Oct; 38(7): 746-751. crossref(new window)

3.
Kalichman L, Malkin I, Kobyliansky E. Association between physique characteristics and hand skeletal aging status. Am J Phys Anthropol 2005 Dec; 128(4): 889-895. crossref(new window)

4.
Chaouachi M, Chaouachi A, Chamari K, Chtara M, Feki Y, Amri M, Trudeau F. Effects of dominant somatotype on aerobic capacity trainability. Br J Sports Med 2005 Dec; 39(12): 954-959. crossref(new window)

5.
Malousaris GG, Bergeles NK, Barzouka KG, Bayios IA, Nassis GP, Koskolou MD. Somatotype, size and body composition of competitive female volleyball players. J Sci Med Sport 2008 Jun; 11(3): 337-344. crossref(new window)

6.
CristObal Sachez-Munoz, David Sanz, Mikel Zabala. Anthropometric characteristics, body composition and somatotype of elite junior tennis players. Br J Sports Med 2007; 41: 793-799. crossref(new window)

7.
Slater GJ, Rice AJ, Mujika I, et al. Physique traits of lightweight rowers and their relationship to competitive success. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 736-741. crossref(new window)

8.
Ackland TR, Ong KB, Kerr DA, Ridge B. Morphological characteristics of Olympic sprint canoe and kayak padlers. J Sci Med Sport 2003 Sep; 6(3): 285-294. crossref(new window)

9.
Legaz Arrese A, Gonzalez Badillo JJ, Serrano Ostariz E. Differences in skinfold thicknesses and fat distribution among top-class runners. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2005 Dec; 45(4): 512-517.

10.
Singh AP, Singh SP. Somatotypic variations: An analysis of some traditional occupations. J. Hum. Ecol 2006; 19(4): 249-251.

11.
Saranga SP, Prista A, Nhantumbo L, Beunen G, Rocha J, Williams-Blangero S, Maia JA. Heritabilities of somatotype components in a population from rural Mozambique. Am J Hum Biol 2008 Nov-Dec; 20(6): 642-646. crossref(new window)

12.
Petrofsky J, Bains G, Prowse M, Gunda S, Berk L, Raju C, Ethiraju G, Vanarasa D, Madani P. Dry heat, moist heat and body fat: are heating modalities really effective in people who are overweight? J Med Eng Technol 2009; 33(5): 361-369. crossref(new window)

13.
Wall-Scheffler CM, Chumanov E, Steudel-Numbers K, Heiderscheit B. Electromyography activity across gait and incline: The impact of muscular activity on human morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol 2010 Dec; 143(4): 601-611. crossref(new window)

14.
Ageno W, Piantanida E, Dentali F, Steidl L, Mera V, Squizzato A, Marchesi C, Venco A. Body mass index is associated with the development of the post-thrombotic syndrome. Thromb Haemost 2003 Feb; 89(2): 305-309.

15.
Hernan Jimenez O, Ramirez-Velez R. Strength training improves insulin sensitivity and plasma lipid levels without altering body composition in overweight and obese subjects. Endocrinol Nut 2011 Apr; 58(4): 169-174. crossref(new window)

16.
Choi WS, Choi JH, Cho MS, Moon OK, Park JH, Chung HK, Lee SH, Lee JS, Min KO. A comparison of the results from somatotype evaluation with different evaluation tools. J Int Acad Phys Ther Res 2010; 1: 65-72.

17.
Carvajal W, Betancourt H, Leon S, Deturnel Y, Martinez M, Echevarria I, Castillo ME, Serviat N. Kinanthropometric profile of Cuban women Olympic volleyball champions. MEDICC Rev 2012 Apr; 14(2): 16-22. crossref(new window)

18.
Jukic J, Katic R, Blazevic S. Impact of morphological and motor dimensions on success of young male and female karateka. Coll Antropol 2012 Dec; 36(4): 1247-55.

19.
Carter JEL, Heath BH. Somatotyping; Development and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990.

20.
Choi WS, The effect of somatotype on muscle activity pattern, gait parameter and hormone changes during treadmill exercise. Yong In University 2009.

21.
Ernst Kretschmer. Korperbau und Charakter : Untersuchungen zum Konstitutions problem und zur Lehre von den Temperamenten. J Springer 1922.

22.
Sheldon WH. Varieties of Human Physique. Hafner Publishing Co Ltd; New edition Dec 1940.

23.
Hooton EA. Body build in relation to military function in a sample of the U.S. Army. Harvard University, Department of Anthropology, Cambridge 1948.

24.
Bullen AK and Hardy HL. Analysis of body build photographs of 175 college women. Am J Phys Anthropol 1946; 4: 37-65. crossref(new window)

25.
Cureton TK. Physical fitness, appraisal and guidance. Henry Kimpton, London 1947.

26.
Parnell RW. Somatotyping by physical anthropometry. Am J Phys Anthropol 1954; 12: 209-239. crossref(new window)

27.
Parnell RW. Behavior and Physique. Edward Arnold, London 1958.

28.
Damon A, Bleibtreu K, Elliot O. and Giles E. Predicting somatotype from body measurements. Am J Phys Anthropol 1962; 20: 461-474. crossref(new window)

29.
Clarke HH. Physical and Motor Tests in the Medford Boys' Growth Study. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 1971.

30.
Peterson G. Atlas for somatotyping children. Assen, The Netherands; Koninklijke Van Gorcum & Company 1967.

31.
Swalus P and Van der Maren B. Etude des relations entre le somatotype et une serie de mesures anthropometriques. Hermes(Louvain) 1968-69; 3: 41-51.

32.
Swalus P. Etude des relations entre le somatotype et different facteurs de l'aptitude motrice chez les garcons de 12 a 19 ans. Kinanthropologie 1969; 1: 3-14.

33.
Swalus P, Beunen G, Ostyn M, Renson R, Simons J, and Van Gerven D. Comparison des methodes de Sheldon, Parnell et Heath-Carter pour la determination du somatotype ou du phenotype. Kinanthropologie 1970; 2: 31-42.

34.
Parnell RW. Physique and mental breakdown in young adults. BMJ 1957; 1: 1485-1490. crossref(new window)

35.
Heath BH, Carter JEL. A modified somatotype method. Am J Phys Anthropol 1967; 27: 57-74. crossref(new window)

36.
Sheldon WH(with the collaboration of C.W. Dupertuis and E. McDermott). Atlas of Men. Harper and Brothers, New York 1954.

37.
Yokota M, Berglund LG, Bathalon GP. Female anthropometric variability and their effects on predicted thermoregulatory responses to work in the heat. Int J Biometeorol 2012 Mar; 56(2): 379-385. crossref(new window)

38.
Volkov AV, Shutov IuM, Shutova MZ. Anatomy typological and clinical parallels in case of disturbance of soft tissue formations of shoulder girdle. Khirurgiia(Mosk) 2012; 12: 46-49.

39.
Lewandowska J, Busko K, Pastuszak A, Boguszewska K. Somatotype variables related to muscle torque and power in judoists. J Hum Kinet 2011 Dec; 30: 21-28.

40.
Morton DP, Callister R. Influence of posture and body type on the experience of exercise-related transient abdominal pain. J Sci Med Sport 2010 Sep; 13(5): 485-488. crossref(new window)

41.
Lizana Arce P, Almagia Flores A, Simpson Lelievre C, Ivanovic Marincovic D, Binvignat Gutierrez O, Berral de la Rosa F. Changes of somatotype in high school students, V region, Chile: 1985-2010. Nutr Hosp 2012 Jan-Feb; 27(1): 270-275.

42.
Ramos-Jimenez A, Wall-Medrano A, Hernandez-Torres RP. Physiological and social factors associated with increments of body mass of Mexican young people with intellectual disabilities. Nutr Hosp 2012 Dec; 27(6): 2020-2027.

43.
Malina RM. Tanner and the sport sciences. Ann Hum Biol 2012 Sep; 39(5): 372-381. crossref(new window)

44.
Ozkan A, Kayihan G, Koklu Y, Ergun N, Koz M, Ersoz G, Dellal A. The relationship between body composition, anaerobic performance and sprint ability of amputee soccer players. J Hum Kinet 2012 Dec; 35: 141-146.