JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Effects of Origami on the Improvement of Hand Dexterity
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Effects of Origami on the Improvement of Hand Dexterity
Bae, Ju Han;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study was carried out to investigate the effects of making an origami crane on the improvement of hand dexterity. Subjects composed of 20 normal adult males were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups of 10 people respectively. For the experimental group, a training of making an origami crane was conducted for 40 to 50 minutes a day during a 4-week training period. The control group was made to engage in everyday activities as usual. For pre and post assessment, Groove Pegboard test, Purdue Pegboard Test, and Jebsen Hand Function Test were used. The results on the effects of making an origami crane showed that there was a statistically significant difference in both the Grooved Pegboard test and Purdue Pegboard test(p<.05). In the Jebsen hand function Test, a significant difference was found in handwriting and building pieces of chess(p<.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in comparison with the right hand during the average performance of picking up small stuffs. The activity of making an origami crane for normal adults was confirmed to be helpful to improve the hand dexterity. Accordingly, making an origami crane is suggested to be an effective way to improve the hand dexterity.
 Keywords
Handicrafts;Making an origami Crane;Hand Dexterity;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Hong JR and five others. Handicrafts and crafts for occupational therapists. Seoul; Gyechuk Munhwa Co., 2005.

2.
Yang JW. A study on changes in hand movements in relation to work loads. Collected papers of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society 1991; 8: 197-212

3.
Exner CE. In-hand manipulation skills. In Normal young children a pilot study. J of Occup Reha 1990; 1(4): 63-72.

4.
Williams H. Perceptual and motor development. Englewood 1983.

5.
Shiffman LM. Links Effects of aging on adult hand funtion. Am J Occup Ther 1992; 46(9): 785-792 crossref(new window)

6.
Lee WA. Neuromotor synergies as a basis for coordinated intentional action. J Mot Behav 1984; 16: 135-170. crossref(new window)

7.
Stein C, Yerxa EJ. A test of fine finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1990; 44: 499-504. crossref(new window)

8.
Weise MW, Flatt AE. A pilot study of 198 normal children: pinch strength and hand size in the growing hand. Am J Occup Ther 1971; 25: 10-12

9.
Oh HW, Park ES, Park CI. A study for the standardization of the hand grip strength and finger grip strength of normal pre-school children and school children. J Korean Soc of Occupa Ther 2000; 8(1): 57-76.

10.
Bear-Lehman J, Abreu BC. Evaluating the hand: issues in the reliability and validity. Phys Ther 1989; 69: 1025-1033.

11.
Johanne D, Daniel B, Gina B, et al. Performance of the unaffected upper extremity of elderly stroke patients. Stroke 1996; 27: 1564-1570. crossref(new window)

12.
Kim BS, Jang CM, Kim YH. Evaluation of the hands of normal Korean children by Jebsen Hand Function Tests. J of Korean Academy of Medi Sci 1987; 11: 102-106.

13.
Kim YT, Gang SY, Kim HS. Evaluation of grip strength and hand dexterity according to age. J of Korean Academy of Medi Sci 1994; 18: 780-787.

14.
Lee TY. A study on the standard value of normal children in grooved pegboard tests. J Korean Soc of Occupa Ther 2003; 11(1): 65-72.

15.
McPhee SD. Functional hand evaluation: a review. Am J Occup Ther 1987; 41: 158-163. crossref(new window)

16.
Ruff RM, Parker SB. Gender and age-specific changes in motor speed and eye-hand coordination in adults: onrmative values for the finger tapping and grooved pegboard tests. Percept Mot Skills 1993; 76: 1219-1230. crossref(new window)

17.
Schmidt SL, Oliceira RM, Rocha FR. Influences of handedness and gender in the grooved pegboard test. Brain Cogn 2000; 44: 445-454. crossref(new window)

18.
Talyor N, Sand PL, Jebsen RH. Evaluation of hand function in children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1973; 54: 129-135.

19.
Jebsen RH, Taylor IV, Trieschmann RB. An objective and standard test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1959; 50: 311-319.

20.
Ozcan A, Tulum Z, Piner L. Comparison of pressure pain threshold, grip strength, dexterity and touch pressure of dominant and non-dominant hands within and between right-and left-handed subjects. J of Korean Medi Sci 2004; 19(6): 874-878. crossref(new window)

21.
Arnould C, Penta M, Renders A, Thonnard JL. ABIL-H-AND-Kids: a measure of manual ability in children with cerebral palsy. Neurology 2004; 63: 1045-1052. crossref(new window)

22.
Jeong IY. The effects of handicrafts and crafts activities centering on beadwork on the hand dexterity of hemiplegia patients, Graduate School, Dankook University 2012.

23.
Kim YH, Choi MS, Kim BO. Evaluation of the hands of normal Koreans by Jebsen Hand Function Tests. J of Korean Academy of Medi Sci. 1984; 8: 109-114.

24.
Jeong BH. The effects of occupational therapy after Botulinus toxin injection on the improvement of hand functions in dysmyotonia patients: case study. J Korean Soc of Occupa Ther 2002; 10(2): 127-134.

25.
Son GC, Jeong SI, Cho MG, Lee HY. The effect of stepwise application of horticultural therapy programs on the improvement of traumatic brain injury patients' hand functions. J of Horticultural Sci Techn. 2002; 20(6): 47.