JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Study on Ontology Modeling for Weapon Parts Development Information
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Study on Ontology Modeling for Weapon Parts Development Information
Jang, Woo Hyuk;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Today, It is difficult to search the various and numerous information efficiently. For this reason, Semantic Web emerged to provide searching services more easily through the structuring of a variety of unstructured format data and the definition of meaningful relationships between information. Especially, definition of relationship and meaning among resources is significant to share and infer related information. Ontology modeling plays just that role. Weapon parts development information is unstructured and dispersed all over. There are many difficulties in finding desired information, leading to getting improper outcomes. In this paper, we present an intuitive ontology model with weapon parts development information including the multi-dimensional information analysis and expansion of the relevant information. This study build up a ontology model through creating class and hierarchy about parts information and defining the properties of classes with Ontology Development 101[1] procedures using Protégé tools. The ontology model provides users with a platform on which search of needed information can be easy and efficient.
 Keywords
Ontology;Information Analysis;National Defense Weapon;Parts Development;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
Ontology를 활용한 무기체계 품질경영 연구,안영준;서윤호;

품질경영학회지, 2016. vol.44. 4, pp.735-749 crossref(new window)
1.
Quality Management Study of Weapon System using Ontology, Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 2016, 44, 4, 735  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
N.F. Noy and D.L. McGuinness, Ontology Developement 101 : A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology, Stanford University, CA, 94305. 2001.

2.
Semantic Web, http://ko.wikipidia.org/wiki (accessed Apr., 9, 2015).

3.
J.H. Park, Estimation and Verification of Workflow Changes based the Enterprise Ontology, Master's Thesis of Ulsan University, 2007.

4.
Knowledge Systems Laboratory, A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications, KSL-9271, 1993.

5.
Protégé, http://protege.stanford.edu/index.html (accessed Apr., 9, 2015).

6.
R. Stevens and C. Wroe, “Building Ontologies in DAML + OIL,” Comparative and Functional Genomics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 133-141, 2003. crossref(new window)

7.
Semantic Web, http://kaon.semanticweb.org/ (accessed Apr., 9, 2015).

8.
J.H. Choi, “Hub of Reliable Defense Technology Information” Defense and Technology, Vol. 403, No. 9, pp. 68-73, 2012.

9.
TOVE Ontologies, http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/enterprise-modelling/tove/index.html (accessed Apr., 9, 2015).

10.
M. Fern’andez, A. G’omez-P’erez, and N. Juristo, “Methontology : From Ontological Art Towards Ontological Engineering,” Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering, pp. 33-40, 1997.

11.
D. Fensel, F. van Harmelen, M. Klein and H. Akkermans “On-To-Knowledge : Ontology Based Tools for Knowledge Management,” Proceedings of the eBusiness and eWork 2000 Conference, pp. 1-7, 2000.

12.
J.M. Kim and H.S. Chung, "A Study on Enhancement of Learning Outcomes through Building of Learning Ontologies," Journal of Engineering Education Research, Vol. 11, No.2, pp. 15-24, 2008.

13.
Defense Acquisition Program Administration, "Defense Technology Information Management Business Guide," Established Rule, No. 25, Article 11, pp. 4-5, 2014.

14.
G. Antoniou and V.H. Frank, A Semantic Web Primer, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2008.

15.
H.S. Hwang and J.Y. Lee, “A Study of a Knowledge Inference Algorithm using an Association Mining Method based on Ontologies,” Journal of Korea Multimedia Society, Vol. 11, No. 11, pp. 1566-1574, 2008.