JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Comparison of Carbon Stock Between Forest Edge and Core by Using Connectivity Analysis
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Comparison of Carbon Stock Between Forest Edge and Core by Using Connectivity Analysis
Sung, Sun-Yong; Lee, Dong-Kun; Mo, Yong-Won;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Forest ecosystem is considered as an important stepping stone to minimize the impact of climate change. However, the rapid urbanization has caused fragmentation of forest ecosystem. The fragmentation of forest patch results in edge effect which brings about adverse impacts on forest function and structure. Degradation of forest ecosystem decreases carbon sequestration because edge effect reduces productivity. Therefore, we analyzed the impact of forest edge effect on forest ecosystem carbon stock change in Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do. We used connectivity analysis to determine forest edge and core area. The field study sites were selected with considering forest age, density, class and soil type. Secondly, forest carbon stock was calculated with allometric equation. The soil carbon stock was derived from Walkely-Black method. Lastly, Mann-Whitney test was conducted to validate differences between carbon stock in edge and core area. As a result of study, the connectivity analysis was effective to determine forest edge and core. The core and edge of forest patch showed different composition of tree species and soil properties. Carbon stock per tree in the edge area was lower than that in the core area. However, the difference of soil organic carbon content between the edge and core were relatively small. This assessment can be applied for the conservation of forest patch as well as quantitative assessment on the forest carbon stock change caused by fragmentation.
 Keywords
Soil Organic Carbon;Carbon Sequestration;Edge effect;Fragmentation;Seongnam-si;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Brady N. C. Weil R. R., 2007, The nature and properties of soils, fourteenth edition, Pearson-Prentice Hall.

2.
Global Carbon Project, 2015, Carbon budget and trends 2014.

3.
Harper, K. A., MacDonald, S. E., Burton, P. J., Chen, J., Brosofske, K. D., Saunders, S. C., Euskirchen, E. S., Roberts, D., Jaiteh, M. S., Esseen, P. a., 2005, Edge Influence on Forest Structure and Composition in Fragmented Landscapes, Conservation Biology, 19(3): 768-82. crossref(new window)

4.
Henry, M., Tittonel, P., Manlay, R. J., Bernoux, M.. Albrecht, A.. Valauwe, B., 2009, Biodiversity, carbon stocks and sequestration potential in aboveground biomass in smallholder farming systems of western Kenya, Agricultural Ecosystem Environment 129: 238-252. crossref(new window)

5.
Hwang, S. I. and Park, S. H. 2011, A Comparative Study on Estimation Methodologies of Carbon Sequestration Amount by Vegetation for Environmental Impact Assessment on Development Projects, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 20(4) : 477-487.

6.
IPCC, 2003, Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. Japan, IPCC.

7.
Jobbagy, E. G. and Jackson, R. B.. 2000, The Vertical Distribution of Soil Organic Carbon and Its Relation to Climate and Vegetation, Ecological Applications, 10(2): 423-436. crossref(new window)

8.
Kim, E. Y., Song, W. K., Lee, D. K., 2012, Forest Fragmentation and its Impacts : A Review, Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 15(2) : 149-162. crossref(new window)

9.
Kim, J. G., Park, J. H., Choi, B. J., Sim, J. H., Kwon, G. J., Lee, B. A., Lee, Y. W., Ju, E. J., 2004, Method in Ecology, Bomoondang.

10.
Lal, R., 2005, Forest Soils and Carbon Sequestration, Forest Ecology and Management, 220(1-3): 242-258. crossref(new window)

11.
Laurance, W. F., and Bierregaar, R, Jr., 1997, Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

12.
Lee, D. K., Kim, E. Y., Oh. K. S., 2005, Conservation Value Assessment by Considering Patch Size, Connectivity and Edge, Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 8(5) : 56-67.

13.
Lee, H. Y. and Nho. S. C., 2012, Advanced Statistical Methods, Bobmunsa.

14.
Lindenmayer, D.B., R.B. Cunningham and R.B. Donelly. 1997. Decay and collapse of trees with hollows in eastern Australian forests:impacts on arboreal marsupials. Eco. Appl. 7:625-641. crossref(new window)

15.
Lindenmayer. D. B and McCarthy, M. A., 2001, The Spatial Distribution of Non-Native Plant Invaders in a Pine-eucalypt Landscape Mosaic in South-Eastern Australia, Biological Conservation, 102(1): 77-87. crossref(new window)

16.
Lovejoy, T.E., R.O. Bierregaard, A.B. Rylands, J.R. Malcolm, C. Quintela, L. Harper,K. Brown, A. Powell, G. Powell, H. Schubart, and M. Hays. 1986. Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. In: Soule, M.E. (Ed.), Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 257-285.

17.
Matlack, G.R. and Litvaitis J.A. 1999:Forest edges. In Hunter M.L. Jr. (ed.):Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp. 210-233.

18.
Nascimento, H. E. M, and Laurance, W. F., 2004, Biomass Dynamics in Amazonian Forest Fragments, Ecological Applications 14 (4 SUPPL.).

19.
Oosterhoorn, M, and Kappelle, M., 2000, Vegetation Structure and Composition along an Interior-Edge-Exterior Gradient in a Costa Rican Montane Cloud Forest, Forest Ecology and Management, 126(3): 291-307. crossref(new window)

20.
Park E. J., Kang, K. Y., 2010, Estimation of C Storage and Annual CO2 Uptake by Street Trees in Gyeonggi-do, Korea Journal of Environmental Ecology, 24(5) : 591-600.

21.
Seongnam-si, 2011, Seongnam statistical year book. Seongnam-si.

22.
Walkley, A. and Black, I. A., 1934, An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method, Soil Science, 37: 29-37. crossref(new window)

23.
World Bank, 2012, Turn Down Heat: why a 4degree warmer world must be avoided, Washington DC, World bank.