JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Study on Preference Orientation and Effectiveness of an Integration Policy for the Rural married immigrant women according to life areas
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Study on Preference Orientation and Effectiveness of an Integration Policy for the Rural married immigrant women according to life areas
Yang, Soon-Mi; Lee, Jin-Sook; Kim, Hai-Sook;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study aimed at identifying the effectiveness and preference orientation of an social integration policy for rural married immigrant women according to eight life areas. For this purpose was surveyed non-multicultural residents and multicultural couples. By analysis, frist, the assimilation orientation as an model of integration policy for the women was preferred most highly at the life language area by every respondent. The multiculturalism orientation was preferred most highly at the private area such as dietary-life culture. Second, ANOVA analysis showed that the positive effectiveness on the language policy are evaluated most highly by the respondent having assimilation preference orientation. And the positive effectiveness on dietary-life culture policy are evaluated most highly by the respondent having multiculturalism orientation. Third, positive effectiveness level of the policy estimated by the resident was lower than it of multicultural couple significantly. In conclusion, based on results of this study, it can be seen as on that point preference orientation of integration policy for the women, the domain specificity is present in the attitude of the multicultural couple and resident. Therefore it suspect that integration policy for the women should be considered differently according to life sphere.
 Keywords
married immigrant women;integration;assimilation;multiculturalism;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
김미나. (2009). 다문화사회의 진행단계와 정책의 관점: 주요국과 한국의 다문화정책 비교연구. 행정논총, 47(4), 193-223.

2.
설동훈. (2006). 외국의 이민자 정책 비교 및 국내적용 가능성 탐색. 농촌국제결혼정착 방안 세미나 자료집. 농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원.

3.
양순미. (2001). 농촌가족의 건강성에 관한 연구. 경희대학교 박사학위 논문.

4.
양순미. (2006). 농촌 국제결혼부부의 적응 및 생활실태에 대한 비교분석: 중국, 일본, 필리핀, 이주여성 부부중심. 농촌사회, 16(2), 151-179.

5.
양순미. (2011). 한국 농촌사회의 다문화 출현 배경과 실태. 2011 재외한인사회와 다문화국제학술회의 자료집(재외한인학회 등).

6.
양순미. (2012). 농촌 여성결혼이민자의 개인․집단주의 성향이 공동체의식에 미치는 영향-중국, 일본, 필리핀, 베트남, 캄보디아 출신국 중심. 한국가족관계학회지, 17(1), 329-345.

7.
양순미. (2013). 농촌 다문화가족의 자립인식 수준과 지원 요구. 농촌지도와 개발, 20(4), 963-1022.

8.
양순미. (2014). 농촌 다문화의 문화적 통합전략에 대한 탐색 연구. 2013년 농촌진흥청 농업공동연구사업보고서.

9.
양순미, 김승희, 이미화, & 김미숙 (2010). 사례연구를 통해 본 여성결혼이민자를 위한 멘토링 프로그램의 효과. 농촌지도과 개발, 17(2), 153-184.

10.
양순미, 이은정, & 양정남 (2011). 농촌여성결혼이민자들의 교육참여동기유형별 특성 및 교육만족도.교육 후 생활변화에 미치는 효과 분석. 농촌지도와 개발, 18(2), 215-238.

11.
원숙연. (2008). 다문화주의시대 소수자 정책의 차별적 포섭과 배제. 한국행정학보, 42(3), 29-49.

12.
원숙연. (2013). 외국인 정책에 대한 공무원 인식의 역학; 서울시 25개 구청 공무원을 대상으로. 한국행정학보, 47(2), 85-112.

13.
원숙연, & 박진경. (2009). 다문화사회와 외국인정책에 대한 정향성 분석; 중앙정부 공무원의 인식을 중심으로. 행정논총, 47(3), 201-224.

14.
유의정. (2014). 건강한 다문화사회 건설을 위한 정책방향. 시대정신, 봄호.

15.
정창화, & 허영식. (2012). 사회통합의 관점에서 바라본 다문화주의와 공화주의적 주도문화: 독일의 사례를 중심으로. 유럽연구, 30(1), 73-101.

16.
조긍호. (2003). 한국인 이해의 개념틀. 서울: 나남.

17.
헤럴드경제. (2013). 다문화 vs. 안티다문화....누가 애국자인가 (2013. 8. 27).

18.
Arends-Toth, J., & Van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2000). Multicultura lisme: Spanning tussen ideaal en realiteit [Multiculturalism: More an ideal than a reality]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 55, 159-168.

19.
Arends-Toth, J., & Van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2003). Multiculturalism and acculturation: Views of Dutch and Turkish–Dutch. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 249-266. crossref(new window)

20.
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation and adaptation. Applied Psychology : An International Review, 46, 5-34.

21.
Berry, J. W. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 615-631. crossref(new window)

22.
Breugelmans, S.M. & van de Vijver, Fons J.R.(2004). Antece -dents and Components of Majority Attitudes toward Multicul- turalism in the Netherlands. Applied psychology: an international review, 53(3), 400-422.

23.
Hartman, D. & Gerteis, J. (2005). Dealing with Diversity: Mapping Multicultralism in Sociological Terms. Sociological Theory, 23(2), 218-240. crossref(new window)

24.
Montreuil, A., & Bourhis, R. Y. (2001). Majority acculturation orientations toward 'valued' and 'devalued' immigrants. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 698-719. crossref(new window)

25.
Piontkowski, U., Florack, A., Hoelker, P., & Obdrzalek, P. (2000). Predicting acculturation attitudes of dominant and non-dominant groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, 1-26. crossref(new window)

26.
Pratto, F. & Lemieux, A. F. (2001). The psychological ambiguity of immigration and its impilcations for promoting immigration policy. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 413-430. crossref(new window)

27.
Sam, D. (1995). Acculturation attitudes among young immigrants as a function of perceived parental attitudes toward cultural change. Journal of Early Adolescence. 15. 238-258. crossref(new window)

28.
Segall, M. H., Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1999). Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology(2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

29.
Seol, Dong-Hoon. (2005). Global Dimensions in mapping the foreign labor policies of Korea: A comparative and functional analysis. Development and Society 34(1), 75-124.

30.
Zageka, H. & Brown, R. (2002). The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit and intergroup relations: immigrant-majority relations in Germany European. Journal of Social Psychology 32, 171-188.

31.
Zick, A., Wagner, U., Van Dick, R., & Petzel, T. (2001). Acculturation and prejudice in Germany: Majority and minority perspectives. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 541-557. crossref(new window)