JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Structural Relations of Learning Orientation, Self-Efficacy, Learning Transfer and Job Performance of Farmers who Participated in the Strong and Small Farms Education
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Structural Relations of Learning Orientation, Self-Efficacy, Learning Transfer and Job Performance of Farmers who Participated in the Strong and Small Farms Education
Kim, Sa-Gyun; Yang, Suk-Joon;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The purposes of this study are to explain and identify the frame of structural relations of learning orientation, self-efficacy, learning transfer and job performance of farmers who participated in the strong and small farms education. This is an experimental research with the data collected from 495 farmers who have taken the farm education. Based on the collected data, the study conducted a structural equation modeling(SEM) to confirm the validity and analyze the structural relations of the suggested model. Using measured and latent variables drew from the analyses, the study set a structural equation model and tested the model by analysis of the structural equation modeling with AMOS 18.0. The results found from the empirical analysis can be summarized as follows. 1) Learning orientation and self-efficacy positively influenced job performance through learning transfer. 2) The hypothesis that learning orientation would have direct impact on job performance was not supported. 3) The strong and small farms education is useful to expand learning transfer and to enhance job performance. So, government policy support has to reinforce learning support on farmers in order to achieve high performance of learning and job management through farm educations.
 Keywords
strong and small farm;workplace learning;learning transfer;job performance;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
학습전이체계의 구성요인이 IT 담당 공무원의 직무성과에 미치는 영향: 학습전이의 매개 효과를 중심으로,김선덕;

한국지식정보기술학회논문지, 2016. vol.11. 4, pp.331-350
 References
1.
강경화, & 고유경. (2013). 병원간호사의 변화몰입과 학습지향성이 혁신성향에 미치는 영향. 간호행정학회지 , 19(3), 404-413.

2.
고용노동부. (2015). 2015 고용노동부 업무보고자료. 미발간.

3.
김명희. (2009). 사회복지담당 공익근무요원의 교육훈련 전이수준과 직무태도에 관한 연구. 건양대학교 박사논문.

4.
김사균, 이미화, & 박흔동. (2012). 농업인 참여식 실천학습모델 개발과 성과분석-농촌진흥청 강소농 사업을 중심으로. 농촌지도와 개발 , 19(3), 551-579.

5.
김소나. (2010). 기업 이러닝에서 학습전이 관련변수간의 구조적 관계 분석. 이화여자대학교 박사논문.

6.
농촌진흥청. (2015). 2015 강소농사업 업무보고자료 (청장보고). 미발간.

7.
문소령. (2014). 외식업체 종사원의 자기주도학습이 자기효능감 및 직무성과에 미치는 영향: 멘토링 연결 망의 조절효과를 중심으로. 호남대학교 박사논문.

8.
박영배, & 박형권. (2003). 조직의 학습지향성이 조직 성과에 미치는 영향과 상황요인의 조절효과에 관한 연구. 인사관리연구, 27(2), 83-109.

9.
박용석. (2014). 교육훈련프로그램 특성이 학습전이 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 학습전이풍토의 영향 및 개인적 특성의 조절효과를 중심으로. 동명대학교 박사논문.

10.
신수영, & 박원우. (2013). 구성원의 목표성향이 행동 및 성과에 미치는 영향: 목표성향 하위영역의 독립적 메커니즘 탐색. 경영학연구 , 42(1), 29-51.

11.
온세현. (2012). 학습조직화, 학습지향성이 구성원의 성과 향상활동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 대전대학교 박사논문.

12.
유명희. (2007). 컨벤션 형태 기업회의의 참가가치와 직무성과간의 영향관계 연구. 경기대학교 박사논문.

13.
이관표, & 박형권. (2006). 호텔기업의 환경불확실성, 학습지향성, 조직성과의 구조적 인과관계 탐색에 관한 연구. 관광연구, 20(3), 305-328.

14.
이병철, & 윤관식. (2010). K 기업의 학습전이 요인 탐색. 기업교육연구 , 12(1), 91-127.

15.
이서정, 최지원, 안주리, & 정진철. (2013). 해외 농업 국가직무능력표준 제도 비교 분석: 호주, 영국사례를 중심으로. 한국농산업교육학회 학술대회 발표자료집.

16.
이세한. (2013). 직무환경요인이 사회복지전담공무원의 직무만족과 직무성과에 미치는 영향: 조직지원 인식의 매개 및 조절효과를 중심으로. 청주대학교 박사논문.

17.
이주영. (2011), 중소기업 직무교육훈련 참여자의 학습전이와 전이동기 및 전이풍토의 관계. 서울대학교 석사논문.

18.
이창수. (2011). 학습전이가 역량에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 경희대학교 박사논문.

19.
이학식, & 임지훈. (2008). 구조방정식 모형분석과 AMOS 7.0. 서울 : 법문사.

20.
이형석. (2006). 실증연구방법. 서울 : 한경사.

21.
임종원, & 양석준. (2006). 디지털 환경에서 고객 참여를 통한 고객 주도형 관계 구조 형성에 관한 탐색적 연구. A냠 Marketing Journal, 8(1), 19-47.

22.
한안나. (1999). 기업교육에서 학습의 직무 전이에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 박사논문.

23.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. crossref(new window)

24.
Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). Learning orientation, market orientation, and innovation: integrating and extending models of organizational performance. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 4(4), 295-308. crossref(new window)

25.
Bandura, A. (1978). Reflections on self-efficacy. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 237-269. crossref(new window)

26.
Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on selfregulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 805. crossref(new window)

27.
Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1994). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. The Training and Development Sourcebook, 180.

28.
Barrowclough, C., Haddock, G., Tarrier, N., Lewis, S. W., Moring, J., O'Brien, R., & McGovern, J. (2001). Randomised controlled trial of cognitive behavioural therapy plus motivational intervention for schizophrenia and substance use. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 1706-1713. crossref(new window)

29.
Billett, S. (1994). Situated learning: a workplace experience. Australian Journal of Adult and Community Education, 34(2), 112.

30.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1993). Stolen Knowledge. Educational technology, 33(3), 10-15.

31.
Doornbos, A. J., Simons, R. J., & Denessen, E. (2008). Relations between characteristics of workplace practices and types of informal work-related learning : A survey study among Dutch Police. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19(2), 129-151. crossref(new window)

32.
Fiedler, F. E., & Billo, M. W.(1973). Correlates of performance in community collage. Technical Report. University of Washington.

33.
Fomell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluation structural equations model with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.

34.
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy : A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211. crossref(new window)

35.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluation training programs: The four levels. (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Berrett- Koehler Publishers. Inc.

36.
Marsick, V. J. (1987). New paradigms for learning in the workplace. Learning in the Workplace, 16(2), 11-30.

37.
Noe, R. A., Tews, M. J., & McConnell Dachner, A. (2010). Learner engagement: A new perspective for enhancing our understanding of learner motivation and workplace learning. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 279-315. crossref(new window)

38.
Rothwell, W. J., Sanders, E. S., & Soper, J. G. (1999). ASTD models for workplace learning and performance: Roles, competencies, and outputs. American Society for Training and Development.

39.
Shipton, H., Dawson, J., West, M., & Patterson, M. (2002). Learning in manufacturing organizations: What factors predict effectiveness? Human Resource Development International, 5(1), 55-72. crossref(new window)

40.
Sugrue, B., & Rivera, R. (2005). ASTD 2005 state of the industry report.

41.
VandeWalle, D., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 390. crossref(new window)

42.
Wexley, Kenneth N., et al. (1991). Developing and training human resources in organizations. No. C10 25. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC (EUA). Office of International Cooperation and Development. AID, Washington, DC (EUA). Bureau for Science and Technology.