JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Study on Comparison of the Characteristic Test of Discharge Water Flowmeters (Electromagnetic Flowmeter, Parshall Flume)
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Study on Comparison of the Characteristic Test of Discharge Water Flowmeters (Electromagnetic Flowmeter, Parshall Flume)
An, Yang-ki; Kim, Jee-young; Kim, Kum-hee; Jang, Hee-soo; Jung, Jung-pil; Choi, Jong-woo;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The test of comparing liquid flow calibration system (approved by KOLAS) for accuracy and structure change test was performed in the test bed in order to evaluate the typical characteristics of the electromagnetic flow meters and parshall flume that are generally used in the water discharging facilities. The results of the accuracy comparing test with liquid flow calibration system showed the error of less than 2%. Pharshall plume got error up to -8.3% (low flow) from the flow rate test, but less than 4% from the accumulated flow test because of offset error at high flow rate and low flow rate. Evaluation of structual change test was tested with only parshall flume using structure and it consisted of installation angle (parshall flume and level sensor) and position change. Installation angle, water level sensor angle and position changing test for parshall flume had errors of 3.1%~-9.2%, 0.4%~-5.6% and 0.2%~1.3% respectively. Especially, the error showed the largest increase when the water level sensor measured the point of decreased flow by the structure change. Therefore, error factors (change of straight pipe length, installation of obstacle or effect of foreign substances on water level sensor) that can often occur in the field should be derived and the research for optimized installation method should be carried out continuously.
 Keywords
Closed Channel;Electromagnetic Flowmeter;Flowmeter;Liquid Flow Calibration System;Open Channel;Parshall Flume;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
US Environmental protection agency, 2004, "NPDES Inspection Manual", part 6.

2.
Lim, K. W., Choi, J. O., and Lee, W. K., 2004, "A study on the uncertainty estimation of flowmeter calibrator with two master flowmeters", The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 1219-1230.

3.
환경부, 2012, "수질오염공정시험기준 ES04140"

4.
기술표준원, 2009, "KS B 5260 전자유량계"

5.
ISO, 1992, "ISO 9826 Measurement of liquid flow in open channels-Parshall and SANIIRI flumes".

6.
기술표준원, 2009, "KS B ISO 8368 수리량측정-구조물을 이용한 개수로의 유체흐름 측정-구조물 선택지침"

7.
JIS, 1993, "JIS 7553 Parshall flume type flowmeters".

8.
과학기술처, 1995, "오폐수 유량계 교정기술 개발(제1차년도)".

9.
Lee, D. K. and Park, J. H., 2008, "Uncertainty characteristics of diverter for flowmeter calibration system", The KSFM Journal of Fluid Machinery Vol. 11, pp.50-55.

10.
Kim, S. Y. and Lee, S. O., 2013, "Dimensionless discharge formula of parshall flumes with arbitrary shape", Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 33, pp. 1777-1783. crossref(new window)

11.
Park, Y. C., Nam, K-H., Park, J-G., 2013, "Characteristics for Straight Running Length of Flow Meter for Calibration", The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 124-129.