JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Input Performance of the Old Adults in Touch Interface
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Input Performance of the Old Adults in Touch Interface
Hong, Seung-Kweon; Park, Jung-Chul; Kim, Sun-Su;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In order to design a touch interface for the elderly, human performance of input tasks on the touch screen was investigated by the laboratory experiment. Input times and input errors were measured in the experimental conditions that were changed according to age, key size, interkey space and input tool(finger or stylus pen). In the most of all experimental conditions, the task performance of the elderly was lower than that of the young. However, there were significantly different performance patterns between both groups. As the difficulty of task was getting higher, the task performance of the elderly was sharply decreased; pressing small key button by finger sharply increased input time and error rate, compared to that of the young. Therefore, the square key size suitable to the elderly may be over . While the interkey space did not influence to the input task performance of the young, the task performance of the elderly was influenced. The elderly showed big difference of task performance according to input tool. However, the young were less influenced by input tool.
 Keywords
Old adults;Touch;Interface design;Key size;Input;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
고령자의 스마트폰 사용성 향상을 위한 연구,한영석;최종규;황보환;고상민;윤솔희;지용구;

한국전자거래학회지, 2012. vol.17. 1, pp.39-52 crossref(new window)
1.
A Study on Elderly for Improvement of Usability on Smartphone, The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 2012, 17, 1, 39  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
김정룡, 조은주, 조영진, 정민근, 휴대전화 설계를 위한 고령자용인지능력 측정 프로토콜 개발, 대한인간공학회지, Vol 28, No 3, 115-123, 2009.

2.
Colle, H. A. and Hiszem, K. J., Standing at a Kiosk: Effects of Key Size and Spacing on Touch Screen Numeric Keypad Performance and User Preference. Erogonomics, Vol 47. No. 13, 1406-1423, 2004. crossref(new window)

3.
Czaja, S. J., Computer Technology and the Old Adult. In T. K. Landauer and P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (PP 797-824). Amsterdam: North-Holland. 1997.

4.
Douglas, S. A. and Mithal, A. K., The Ergonomics of Computer Pointing Devices. London: Springer, 1997.

5.
Galitz, W. O., The Essential Guide to User Interface Design - An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques. New York: Wiley, 1997.

6.
Salthouse, T. A., Perceptual, Cognitive and Motoric Aspects of Transcription Typing, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 99., No 3, 303-319, 1986. crossref(new window)

7.
Schedlbauer, M., Effects of Key Size and Spacing on The Completion Time and Accuracy of Input Tasks on Soft Keypads Using Trackball and Touch Input, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 51st Annual Meeting, 2007.

8.
Shneiderman, B., Designing the User Interface: Strategy for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1987.

9.
Vanderheiden, G. C., Design for People with Functional Limitations Resulting from Disability, Aging or Circumstances. In G. Salvendy (Eds.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (pp 2012-2052), New York: Wiley, 1997.

10.
Wright, P., Bartram, C., Rogers, N., Emslie, H., Evans, J., Wison, B. and Belt, S., Text Entry on Handheld Computers by Older Users. Ergonomics, Vol. 43, No. 6, 702-716. 2000. crossref(new window)