JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Development Software to Select Boundary Manikins for Product Evaluation: Applied to an Automobile Case
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Development Software to Select Boundary Manikins for Product Evaluation: Applied to an Automobile Case
Lim, Young-Jae; Park, Sung-Joon; Park, Woo-Jin; Park, Jun-Soo; Jung, Eui-S.; Lim, Ik-Sung;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Usability evaluation of physical products involves characterizing complex physical interactions between humans and products. Human models known as manikins have been widely utilized as usability evaluation tools for automobile interior package design. When combined with computer-aided design software programs, such manikins can be used to simulate driving postures and evaluate driver-interior fits early in the design process, and therefore, may greatly facilitate achieving high-quality design in a cost-efficient manner. The purpose of this study was to define a set of manikins for designing automobile interior packages for the South Korean male population. These manikins were conceptualized as "boundary" manikins, which represent individuals lacking in certain physical capacities or having usability-related issues (e.g., an individual with the 5th percentile forward reach capability, an individual with the 95th percentile shoulder width). Such boundary manikins can serve as an efficient tool for determining if an automobile interior design accommodates the majority of the population. The boundary manikins were selected from the large sample of Korean males whose anthropometric dimensions were described in the recent Size Korea anthropometric database. For each male in the database, his comfortable driving posture was represented using a kinematic body linkage model and various physical capacity measured and usability-related characteristics relevant to driver accommodation were evaluated. For each such measure, a boundary manikin was selected among the Korean males. The manikins defined in this study are expected to serve as tools for ergonomic design of automobile interior packages. The manikin selection method developed in this study was implemented as a generic software program useful for various product design applications.
 Keywords
Usability evaluation;Boundary manikins;Driving posture;User accommodation;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
The Study on Selection of human Model for Controllability Evaluation According to Working Postures,;;;;

Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2012. vol.31. 3, pp.437-444 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
박성준, 다변량 통계기법을 활용한 표준 운전자세의 도출, 대한인간공학회지, 25(1), 27-33, 2006. crossref(new window)

2.
성덕현, 정의승, 다변량 통계분석 방법을 이용한 한국인 성인 남녀 체형분류, 대한인간공학회지, 24(4), 39-46, 2005. crossref(new window)

3.
이경선, PUI 디자인 가이드라인 도출을 위한 프로세스 개발, 2007 대한인간공학회 추계학술대회논문집, 355-358, 2007.

4.
이인석, 박재희, 박태주, 물리적 사용자 인터페이스 측면에서 김치냉장고의 사용자 만족도 조사, 대한인간공학회지, 26(4), 113-120, 2007. crossref(new window)

5.
Badler, N., Allbeck, J., Lee, S. J., Rabbitz, R., Broderick, T. and Mulkern, K., New behavioral paradigms for virtual human models, SAE Technical Paper, 114, 723-729, 2005.

6.
Blankevoort, R. Huiskes and Lange, A.D., The envelope of passive knee joint motion, Journal of Biomechanics, 21(9), 705-720, 1988. crossref(new window)

7.
Chaffin, D. B., Improving digital human modeling for proactive ergonomics in design, Ergonomics, 48(5), 478-491, 2005. crossref(new window)

8.
Chang, S. W. and Wang, M. J., Digital Human Modeling and Workplace Evaluation: Using an Automobile Assembly Task as an Example, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 17(5), 445-455, 2007. crossref(new window)

9.
De Leba, P., Joint center longitudinal positions computed from a selected subset of Chandler's data, Journal of Biomechanics, 29(9), 1231-1233, 1996. crossref(new window)

10.
Dufour, F. and Wang, X., Discomfort assessment of car ingress/egress motions using the concept of neutral motion, SAE Technical Paper, 114, 2905-2913, 2005.

11.
Eynard, E., Fubini, E., Masali, M., Cerrone, M. and Tarzia, A., Generation of virtual man models representative of different body proportion and application to ergonomic design of vehicles, Proceedings of the IEA2000/HFES2000 Congress, 489-492, 2000.

12.
Frigo, C. and Rabuffetti, M., Multifactorial estimation of hip and knee joint centres for clinical application of gait analysis, Gait and Posture, 8(2), 91-102, 1998. crossref(new window)

13.
Jared M. Spool, Tara Scanlon and Carolyn Snyder, Product Usability: Survival Techniques, proceeding of CHI 97 conference on Human factors in computing systems, 154-155, 1997.

14.
Jingzhou Yang, Joo H. Kim, Karim Abdel-Malek, Timothy Marler, Steven Beck and Gregory R. Kopp, A new digital human environment and assessment of vehicle interior design, Computer-Aided Design, 39, 548-558, 2007. crossref(new window)

15.
Neville, S., Human Factors in Consumer Products, Taylor and Francis, London, 1998.

16.
Norman, D., The Design of Everyday Things, Basic Books, New York, 1988.

17.
Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, Bus Operator Workstation Evaluation and Design Guidelines, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1997.

18.
Porter, J., K. Case, M. Freer, and Bonney, M., Automotive Ergonomics, Chapter: Computer-aided ergonomics design of automobiles, Taylor and Francis, London, 1993.

19.
Vogt, C., Mergl, C. and Bubb, H., Interior Layout Design of Passenger Vehicles with RAMSIS, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 15(2), 197-212, 2005. crossref(new window)