Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Training Requirements for Control Room Operators of an Advanced Nuclear Power Plant
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Training Requirements for Control Room Operators of an Advanced Nuclear Power Plant
Park, Hong Joon; Park, Geun Ok; Kim, Sa Kil; Byun, Seong Nam;
  PDF(new window)
Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the training requirements of new nuclear power plant by a comprehensive literature review. Background: The design of instrumental and control systems for New NPP is applied fully digitalized systems. For example, soft-control, large display panels(LDP), and an advanced alarm system were applied to the APR-1400 or SMART. Method: The NUREG-0711 and international guideline of training program was analyzed from the following four phases of SAT(Systemic Approach to Training): Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation. Results: To identify the requirement of training program, 'Feedback' phase was considered and each phase of SAT was classified. Conclusion: A more systematic requirement of training program is needed which considers the computerized system was applied to the new NPP. Application: The results of the publishing can be useful for standardization of the systematic training program for the operators of NPP.
Training program;Systemic Approach to Training(SAT);SAT requirements;Human errors;
 Cited by
Annett, J. & Duncan, K., Task analysis and training in design, Occupational Psychology, 41, 1967.

ANSI/ANS-3.1, Selection, qualification, and training of personnel for nuclear power plants, 1993.

ANSI/ANS-3.5, Nuclear power plants simulator for use in operating training and examination, 1994.

Bailey, R.W., Human Performance Engineering: Using human factors/ ergonomics to achieve computer system usability, 2nd edition Prentice-Hall International Edition, 1989.

IAEA-TECDOC 995, Selection, specification, design and use of various nuclear, 1998.

INPO, Control Room Teamwork Development Training: Course Administration and Facilitation Guide, National Academy for Nuclear Training, Atlanta, GA, 1993.

INPO, Human Performance Tools for Workers (INPO 06-002), 2006.

Kim, S.K. et al., "Crew Resource Management Training for Improving Team Performance of Operators in Korea Advanced Nuclear Power Plant", Proceedings of 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 2055-2059), Hong Kong, 2009.

Kirkpatrick, D.L., Evaluation training programs: The four levels, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler, 1994.

Lee, D.H. et al., Short-Term Human Factors Engineering Measures for Minimizing Human Error in Nuclear Power Facilities, ESK Journal, 26(4), 121-125, 2007. crossref(new window)

Roth, E. and O'Hara, J., Integrating digital and conventional HSIs: Lessons learned from a control room modernization program, BNL letter Report J6012-T3-4-5/98, Upton, NY: Brookhaven National Laboratory, 1998.

Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Baber, C. & Jenkins, D.P., Human factors methods: a practical guide for engineering and design, Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2005.

U.S.NRC, 10CFR50, Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities, 1998.

U.S.NRC, 10CFR52, Licensing, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants, 2007.

U.S.NRC, 10CFR55, Operator's Licenses, 2007.

U.S.NRC, NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants, 2007.

U.S.NRC, NUREG-0711, Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model, 2004.

Zohar, D., A, group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on micro accidents in manufacturing jobs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 587-596, 2000. crossref(new window)