JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Case Studies of Risk Assessment in Analyzing Risks Associated with MSDS
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Case Studies of Risk Assessment in Analyzing Risks Associated with MSDS
Kim, Woo Jin; Jeong, Byung Yong;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Objective: This study aims to suggest different approaches in analyzing risks associated with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDS) for risk assessment. Background: Upon concluding that the changes in the industrial environments have made it hard to regulate diverse risk factors, the government has implemented a policy for risk assessment. Method: This study has proposed a method, creating programs using Excel that perform qualitative or quantitative analysis, for evaluating risk factors in risk assessments and has applied this in manufacture and service industries. Results: To verify the validity of the developed program, risk assessment has been performed on restaurant chefs as an example. For quantitative evaluation, the study has suggested approaches using the results for REBA evaluation and the analysis report on the work scenes of a fitting-shop in a shipbuilding industry. Application: Constructing and adapting a system using Excel in evaluating risk factors for risk assessments as this study suggests, is expected to contribute to revitalizing risk assessments.
 Keywords
Risk assessment;Musculoskeletal disorders;OWAS;RULA;REBA;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Hignett, S. and McAtamney, L., Rapid Entire Body Assessment, Applied Ergonomics, 31(2), 201-205, 2000. crossref(new window)

2.
HSE, Marine Risk Assessment, HSE Books, 2002.

3.
HSE, Five Steps to Risk Assessment, HSE Books, Sudbury, UK, 1998.

4.
HSE, Review of Hazard Identification Techniques, HSE Books, Sudbury, UK, 2000.

5.
HSE, Marine Risk Assessment, HSE Books, Sudbury, UK, 2002.

6.
Jeong, B.Y. et al., Development of Evaluation Softwares for Job Hazard Analysis, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 24(4), 79-83, 2005. crossref(new window)

7.
Jeong, B.Y., Risk Factors Analysis System: Current Issues and Future Directions, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 26(2), 123 -129, 2007. crossref(new window)

8.
Jeong, B.Y., Ergonomics' Role for Preventing Musculoskeletal Disorders, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 29(4), 1-12, 2010. crossref(new window)

9.
Jeong, B.Y. et al., Risk Assessment in the Shipbuilding Industry: Present and the future, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 31(1), 143-149, 2012. crossref(new window)

10.
Karhu, O., Kansi, P. and Kuorinka, I., Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis, Applied Ergonomics, 8(2), 199-201, 1977. crossref(new window)

11.
KOSHA, 2011 Statistics on Occupational Injuries and Illnesses, KOSHA, 2012, http://www.kosha.or.kr/

12.
KOSHA, Risk Assessment Manual, KOSHA, 2012.

13.
KOSHA, KOSHA GUIDE H-9-2012, 2012.

14.
McAtamney, L. and Corlett, E.N., RULA: A survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders, Applied Ergonomics, 24(2), 91-99, 1993. crossref(new window)