Advanced SearchSearch Tips
An Evaluation of Transfer of Training Effects on Nuclear Power Plant MCR Operators
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
An Evaluation of Transfer of Training Effects on Nuclear Power Plant MCR Operators
Kim, Jung Ho; Byun, Seong Nam;
  PDF(new window)
Objective: The aim of this study sets factors from previous research known to impact transfer effects as the independent variables, and examines their relationship with the dependent variables, near transfer effects and far transfer effects. Background: Transfer of Training refers to the application of what learners acquire knowledge and skills in training programs to their job. The ultimate goal of training is to apply what employees learn in training sessions to their workplace. In this sense, transfer of training has been a vital concern for training effectiveness. For training to be effective, trainees(learners) should be able to use what they learn in training program back on the job. Method: For this research purpose, this study conducted a survey on 170 nuclear operators in nuclear education and training center. Of these, survey result from the 167 recruits were sampled. Theoretical model of this study is based on Holton & Baldwin's(2003) distance model of transfer effects. This study sets transfer effects(near transfer, far transfer) as the main dependent variables. Meanwhile, the independent variables are trainee characteristics, training characteristics, organizational transfer climate. Each independent variable has subordinate variables. Subordinate variables of trainee characteristics are self-efficacy, motivation to learn, motivation to transfer and ability to transfer. Subordinate variables of training characteristics are training contents, ability of trainers, training design, training climate. The last Subordinate variables of organizational transfer climate are support of supervisors, support of peer, support of organization. Conclusion: As a analysis result, trainee characteristics appeared to be in effect only significant influence near far transfer of training, the effect of the far transfer of training, there is no significant. In addition, the training characteristics appeared to be having a significant influence on near and far transfer effects. Organizational transfer climate appeared to be having a significant influence on near and far transfer effects. Finally, near transfer effect appeared to be having a significant influence on far transfer effects. Application: Results of this analysis in the study to training organization and training characteristics of the transition environment effects on nuclear power institutions and operators training organization having a significant impact that says. The transfer of knowledge and technology, as well as that can be applied to a new situation in terms of education and training are important characteristics.
Transfer of Training;Transfer effect;Nuclear MCR operators;Trainee characteristics;Organizational transfer climate;Near transfer;Far transfer;
 Cited by
Effects of the Training Transfer Management on the Workers in Nuclear Power Plants,Kim, Seonsu;Luo, Meiling;Lee, Yong-Hee;

Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2014. vol.33. 1, pp.49-58 crossref(new window)
Effects of the Training Transfer Management on the Workers in Nuclear Power Plants, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2014, 33, 1, 49  crossref(new windwow)
Axtell, C., Maitlis, S. and Yerta, S., "Predicting immediate and longer-term transfer of training", Personnel Review, Vol. 26, pp. 201-12, 1997. crossref(new window)

Cascio,W.F., Costing Human Resources: The Financial Impact of Behavior in Organizations, 4th (Cincinnati, OH: South-Western), 2000.

Chae, S.I., Social science research method, B & M books, seoul, 2005.

Gaddy, C. and Wachtel, J., Team skills training in nuclear power plant operations, in Swezey, R. and Salas, E.(Eds), Teams: Their Training and Performance, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1992.

Gist, M.E., Stevens, C.K. and Bavetta, A.G., "Effects of Self-Efficacy and Post-Training Intervention on the Acquisition and Maintenance of Complex Interpersonal Skills", Personnel Psychology, 44, 837-861, 1991.

Goldstein. I.L. and Ford, J., Training in organization. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2002.

Holton, E.F., In research of on interactive model for HRD evaluation. Academy of Human Resource Development 1995 Conference Proceeding. chap. 2-4, 1996.

Joyce, B. and Clift, R. "The Phoenix Agenda: Essential Reform in Teacher Education", Educational Researcher 13, 5-18, 1984.

Kim, K.S., AMOS structural equation modeling, SPSS academy, seoul, 2005.

Kirkpatrick, D.L., Evaluation of Training. In R.L. Craig, & L. R. Bittel, Training and Development Handbook (pp.87-112). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

Kraiger, K., Decision-based evaluation. In K. Kraiger (ed.), Creating, Implementing, and Maintaining Effective Training and Development: State-of-the-Art Lessons for Practice, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002.

Laker, D.R., "Dual dimensionality of training transfer", Human Resource Development Quarterly, 1(3), 209-235, 1990. crossref(new window)

Lee, K.H., Social science research method, bobmunsa, seoul, 2005.

Noe, R.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Gerhart, B. and Wright, P.M., Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage, 6th edn (Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Irwin), 2006.

Noe, A., "Trainees' attributes and attitudes: neglected influences on training effectiveness", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, pp. 736 -749, 1986.

Park, Y.H., "A Study on Measures to improve transfer of learning in companies", Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education & Training, 2011.

Robinson, D.G. and Robinson J.C., Training for impact: how to link training to business needs and measure the result. San francisoco. CA:, Jessey-Bass, 1989.

Smith, A., Evaluation and effectiveness. Journal of Management Development, Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 20-33, 1993.

Tesluk, P.E., Farr, J.L., Mathieu, J.E. and Vance, R.J., "Generalization of Employee Involvement Training to the Job Setting: Individual and Situational Effects", Personnel Psychology, 48, 607-632, 1995. crossref(new window)

Warr, P., Allan, C. and Birdi, K., "Predicting three levels of training outcome", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 72, pp. 351-375, 1999. crossref(new window)

Wexley, K.N. and Latham, G.P., Developing and training human resources in Organizations(3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.