JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Comparison of Subjective Mental Workload Measures in Driving Contexts
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Comparison of Subjective Mental Workload Measures in Driving Contexts
Kim, Ji Yeon; Ji, Yong Gu;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Objective: This study aims to compare the usefulness of subjective measures which are comprised of existing methods like NASA-TLX, Bedford-scale and ZEIS and newly developed method like DALI in measuring drivers` mental workload in terms of validity, sensitivity and diagnosticity. Background: Nowadays, with the development of intelligent vehicle and HMI, mental workload of driver has become more and more important. For this reason, the studies on drivers` mental workload about driving situation and the use of information technology equipment such as mobile phones and navigations were conducted intensively. However, the studies on measuring drivers` mental workload were rarely conducted. Moreover, most of studies on comparison of subjective measures were used with performance based measure. However, performance based measures can cause distraction effect with subjective measures. Method: Participants (N
 Keywords
Mental workload;Subjective measures;Vehicle domain;ZEIS;Bedford-scale;NASA-TLX;DALI;U-City;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Brookings, J.B., Wilson, G.F. & Swain, C.R., Psychophysiological responses to changes in workload during simulated air traffic control, Biological Psychology, 42(3), 361-377, 1996. crossref(new window)

2.
Cantin, V., Lavalliere, M., Simoneau, M. & Teasdale, N., Mental workload when driving in a simulator: Effects of age and driving complexity, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(4), 763-771, 2009. crossref(new window)

3.
Chin, E., Nathan, F., Pauzie, A., Manzano, J., Nodari, E., Cherri, C, et al. Subjective Assessment methods for Workload. http://www.aide-eu.org/ pdf/sp2_deliv_new/aide_d2_2_6.pdf, 2004.

4.
De Waard, D., The measurement of Driver's Mental workload. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Groningen. Traffic research center. Haren, The Netherlands, 1996.

5.
Doyle, M.J., Psychophysiological correlates of cognitive workload during a satellite management decision-training task. In proceedings of Human Systems Integration Symposium, Annapolis, Maryland, http:// navalengineers.net/Proceedings/HSIS2009/Index.html, 2007.

6.
Eggemeier, F.T., Wilson, G.F., Kramer, A.F. & Damos, DL., General considerations concerning workload assessment in multi-task environments. Taylor & Francis, London, 1991.

7.
Hill, S.G., Iavecchia, H.P., Byers, J.C., Bittner, A.C., Byers, J.C., Zaklade, A.L. & Christ, R.E., Comparison of Four Subjective Workload Rating Scales. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 34(4), 429-439, 1992.

8.
Horberry, T., Anderson, J., Regan, M.A., Triggs, T.J. & Brown, J., Driver distraction: The effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(1), 185-191, 2006. crossref(new window)

9.
Lei, S. & Roetting, M., Influence of Task Combination on EEG Spectrum Modulation for Driver Workload Estimation, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53(2), 168-179, 2011. crossref(new window)

10.
Matthews, R., Legg, S. & Charlton, S., The effect of cell phone type on drivers subjective workload during concurrent driving and conversing, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35(4), 451-457, 2003. crossref(new window)

11.
Miller, S., LITERATURE REVEIW Workload Measures. http://www.nads-sc.uiowa.edu/publicationStorage/200501251347060.N01-006.pdf, 2001.

12.
Patten, C.J.D., Kircher, A., Östlund, J. & Nilsson, L., Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36(3), 341-350, 2004. crossref(new window)

13.
Patten, C.J.D., Kircher, A., Ostlund, J., Nilsson, L. & Svenson, O., Driver experience and cognitive workload in different traffic environments, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(5), 887-894, 2006. crossref(new window)

14.
Pauzie, A., A method to assess the driver mental workload: The driving activity load index (DALI), IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2(4), 315-322, 2008. crossref(new window)

15.
Rouse, W.B., Edwards, S.L. & Hammer, J.M., Modeling the dynamics of mental workload and human performance in complex systems, Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 23(6), 1662-1671, 1993. crossref(new window)

16.
Rubio, S., Díaz, E., Martín, J. & Puente, J.M., Evaluation of Subjective Mental Workload: A Comparison of SWAT, NASA-TLX, and Workload Profile Methods, Applied Psychology, 53(1), 61-86, 2004. crossref(new window)

17.
Ryu, K. & Myung, R., Evaluation of mental workload with a combined measure based on physiological indices during a dual task of tracking and mental arithmetic, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35(11), 991-1009, 2005. crossref(new window)

18.
Sterman, M.B., Mann, C.A., Kaiser, D.A. & Suyenobu, B.Y., Multiband topographic EEG analysis of a simulated visuomotor aviation task, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 16(1), 49-56, 1994. crossref(new window)

19.
Teasdale, N., Cantin, V., Blouin, J. & Simoneau, M., Attentional demands while driving in a simulator: effects of driving straights on open roads, approaching intersections and doubling maneuvers, Advances in Transportation Studies an international Journal, 2004 Special issue, 75-84, 2004.

20.
Valentino, D.A., Arruda, J.E. & Gold, S.M., Comparison of QEEG and response accuracy in good vs poorer performers during a vigilance task, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 15(2), 123-133, 1993. crossref(new window)

21.
Verwey, W.B., How can we prevent overload of the driver?, in: Parkes, A.M., S.Franzen. (Eds.), Driving future vehicles. Taylor&Francis, London, pp. 235-244, 1993.

22.
Yeh, Y.-Y. & Wickens, C.D., Dissociation of Performance and Subjective Measures of Workload, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 30(1), 111-120, 1988.