JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Test-Retest Reliability of Paper-Pencil Test for Investigating Burner-Control Linkages of Four-Stove Gas Range
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Test-Retest Reliability of Paper-Pencil Test for Investigating Burner-Control Linkages of Four-Stove Gas Range
Kee, Dohyung;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the test-retest reliability of paper-pencil test for investigating population stereotype of burner-control linkages of four-stove gas ranges. Background: Much of the research on gas-range stereotype strength has been performed using the paper-pencil test. While the use of the paper-pencil tests has the advantage of collecting data in a large group of subjects against reasonable costs, concerns regarding the reliability of the paper-pencil test has also been stated. Method: Three paper-pencil tests classified by intervals of test-retest were performed, in which eight types of burner-control arrangements were investigated. Sixty eight subjects were test-retested within two weeks, 85 subjects were test-retested within four weeks and 58 subjects were test-retested three times in series with interval of two and four weeks. Results: Chi-square test showed that three intervals of test-retest including two, four and two & four weeks have not statistically significant effect on subjects' responses irrespective of eight types of burner-control linkages dealt with in this study(p>0.10). Concordance rates of subjects' responses ranged between 73.5% and 100.0% for two-week test-retest, between 67.1% and 97.6% for four-week test-retest, and between 65.5% and 100.0% for two- and four-week serial test-retest. The concordance rates were linearly correlated with proportion of subjects' responses for stereotypes of burnercontrol linkages. Conclusion: It is concluded that the paper-pencil tests for investigating gas range relevant stereotypes could reproduce reliable results compared to baseline test within interval of four weeks. Application: The results of this study would be useful as an ergonomic guideline when designing the paper-pencil tests for stereotype relevant studies.
 Keywords
Stereotype;Gas range;Burner-control linkage;Test-retest reliability;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
승용 자동차 조종장치 스테레오타입 조사를 위한 설문조사법의 신뢰성,기도형;

대한안전경영과학회지, 2015. vol.17. 2, pp.201-206 crossref(new window)
1.
Test-Retest Reliability of Paper-Pencil Test for Investigating Stereotypes of Controls of Passenger Cars, Journal of the Korea Safety Management and Science, 2015, 17, 2, 201  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Chapanis, A. and Lindenbaum, L.E., A reaction-time study of four controldisplay linkage, Human Factors, 1, 1-7, 1959.

2.
Coluci. M.Z.O., Alexandre, N.M.C. and Rosecrance, J., Reliability and validity of an ergonomics-related Job Factors Questionnaire, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, 995-1001, 2009. crossref(new window)

3.
d'Errico, A., Gore, R.G., Gold, J.E., Park, J-S. and Punnett, L., Mediumand long-term reproducibility of self-reported exposure to physical ergonomics factors at work, Applied Ergonomics, 38, 167-175, 2007. crossref(new window)

4.
Hlapern, M., Nordin, H.M., Goldsheyder, D. and Crane, M., The test-retest reliability of a new occupational risk factor questionnaire for outcome studies of low back pain, Applied Ergonomics, 32, 39-46, 2001. crossref(new window)

5.
Hoffmann, E.R., Do paper-and-pencil tests give an accurate measure of stereotype strength?: A review of available data, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, 904-912, 2009. crossref(new window)

6.
Hsu, S-H. and Peng, Y., Control/display relationship of the four-burner stove: A reexamination, Human Factors, 35(4), 745-749, 1993.

7.
IJmker, S., Mikkers, J., Blatter. B.M., van der Beek, A.J., van Mechelen, W. and Bongers, P.M., Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of a web-based questionnaire measuring workstation and individual correlates of work postures during computer work, Applied Ergonomics, 39, 685-696, 2008. crossref(new window)

8.
Kee, D., Stereotype for control-display relationship o four-burner range for Korean, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 30(3), 389-394, 2011a crossref(new window)

9.
Kee, D., Stereotype and effective cues for burner-control relationship of four-stove range, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 37(2), 118-123, 2011b crossref(new window)

10.
Miyake, S., Yamada, S., Shoji, T., Takae, Y., Kuge, N. and Yamamura, T., Physiological response to workload change. A test/retest examination, Applied Ergonomics, 40, 987-996, 2009. crossref(new window)

11.
Shinar, D. and Acton, M.B., Control-display relationships on the fourburner range: Population stereotypes versus standard, Human Factors, 20, 13-17, 1978.

12.
Wu, S-P., Further studies on the spatial compatibility of four control-display linkages, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19, 353-360, 1997 crossref(new window)