JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Development of Management Guidelines and Procedure for Anthropometric Suitability Assessment: Control Room Design Factors in Nuclear Power Plants
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Development of Management Guidelines and Procedure for Anthropometric Suitability Assessment: Control Room Design Factors in Nuclear Power Plants
Lee, Kyung-Sun; Lee, Yong-Hee;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to develop management guidelines and a procedure for an anthropometric suitability assessment of the main control room (MCR) in nuclear power plants (NPPs). Background: The condition of the MCR should be suitable for the work crews in NPPs. The suitability of the MCR depends closely on the anthropometric dimensions and ergonomic factors of the users. In particular, the MCR workspace design in NPPs is important due to the close relationship with operating crews and their work failures. Many documents and criteria have recommended that anthropometry dimensions and their studies are one of the foremost processes of the MCR design in NPPs. If these factors are not properly considered, users can feel burdened about their work and the human errors that might occur. Method: The procedure for the anthropometric suitability assessment consists of 5 phases: 1) selection of the anthropometric suitability evaluation dimensions, 2) establishment of a measurement method according to the evaluation dimensions, 3) establishment of criteria for suitability evaluation dimensions, 4) establishment of rating scale and improvement methods according to the evaluation dimensions, and 5) assessment of the final grade for evaluation dimensions. The management guidelines for an anthropometric suitability assessment were completed using 10 factors: 1) director, 2) subject, 3) evaluation period, 4) measurement method and criteria, 5) selection of equipment, 6) measurement and evaluation, 7) suitability evaluation, 8) data sharing, 9) data storage, and 10) management according to the suitability grade. Results: We propose a set of 17 anthropometric dimensions for the size, cognition/perception action/behavior, and their relationships with human errors regarding the MCR design variables through a case study. The 17 selected dimensions are height, sitting height, eye height from floor, eye height above seat, arm length, functional reach, extended functional reach, radius reach, visual field, peripheral perception, hyperopia/myopia/astigmatism, color blindness, auditory acuity, finger dexterity, hand function, body angle, and manual muscle test. We proposed criteria on these 17 anthropometric dimensions for a suitability evaluation and suggested an improvement method according to the evaluation dimensions. Conclusion: The results of this study can improve the human performance of the crew in an MCR. These management guidelines and a procedure for an anthropometric suitability assessment will be able to prevent human errors due to inadequate anthropometric dimensions. Application: The proposed set of anthropometric dimensions can be integrated into a managerial index for the anthropometric suitability of the operating crews for more careful countermeasures to human errors in NPPs.
 Keywords
Anthropometry;Suitability;Human error;Main Control Room (MCR);Guideline;Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs);
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Agency for Technology and Standards, Design for Control rooms of Nuclear Power Plants, KS C IEC 60964, 2004.

2.
Cha, W.C. and Kim, N.C., A study of the Evaluation for the Control Room in Human Machine System Under Hybrid Environment, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 28(2), 1-8, 2009.

3.
Corlett, E.N., Salvendy, G. and Seymour, W.D., Selecting operators for fine manual tasks: A study of the O'Connor finger dexterity test and the purdue pegboard, Occupational Psychology, 45(1), 57-65, 1971.

4.
EPRI, Human Factors Guidance for Control Room and Digital Human-System Interface Design and Modification - Guidelines for Planning, Specification, Design, Licensing, Implementation, Training, Operation, and Maintenance, No. 1008122, 2004.

5.
IAEA, Safety of nuclear power plants: design, Safety Standards, Series No. NS-R-1, 2000.

6.
IEEE, IEEE Guide for the Application of Human Factors Engineering in the Design of Computer-Based Monitoring and Control Displays for Nuclear Power Generating Stations, IEEE-STD-1289, 1998.

7.
ISO 1126: Ergonomics-evaluation of static working posture (12.00). Beuth, Berlin, 2000.

8.
Jebsen, R.H., Taylor, N., Trieschmann, R.B., Trotter, M.J. and Howard, L.A., An objective and standardized test of hand function, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 50(6), 311-319, 1969.

9.
Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI), Guideline of personal traits for countermeasures against to the human error in Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs), KAERI/TR-5659/2014, 2014.

10.
KOPEC, Human Factors Engineering Guideline, HF-010, 2006.

11.
Kim, Y.H., Choi, M.S. and Kim, B.W., Assessment of hand function in normal Korean adults by Jebsen hand function test, Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 8(2), 1984.

12.
LaGrone, C.W. and Holland, B.F., Accuracy of perception in peripheral vision in relation to dextrally, intelligence and reading ability, The American Journal of Psychology, 56(4), 592-598, 1943. crossref(new window)

13.
Lee, D.H., An experiment for top-down suitability verification for layout of Korea next generation reactor control room equipment, Theses collection, 18, 333-340, 2000.

14.
Lee, Y.H., "Facilitating HRA through the Input from HIS Design", 2-nd OECD/NEA Workshop on Building the New HRA, 2002.

15.
Lee, Y.H., Jang, T.I. and Lim, H.K., A modification of human error analysis technique for designing man-machine interface in Nuclear Power Plants, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 22(1), 31-42, 2003. crossref(new window)

16.
Lee, Y.H., Jang, T.I., Lee, Y.H., Oh, YJ., Kang, S.H. and Yun, J.H., Research Activities and Techniques for the Prevention of Human Errors during the Operation of Nuclear Power Plants, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 30(1), 75-86, 2011. crossref(new window)

17.
Magee, D.J., Orthopedic physical assessment, 5th ed, Saunders, 2007.

18.
Ministry Government Legislation, Enforcement decree of the atomic energy act 299 (Medical examination), 2013.

19.
Ministry Government Legislation, Enforcement decree of the atomic energy regulation 115 (Medical examination), 2013.

20.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Aeromedical licensing system, 2013.

21.
Pheasant, S., Body space; anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work, 2nd Ed., Taylor & Francis, 1996.

22.
Size Korea Home Page, http://sizekorea.kats.go.kr (retrieved Dec. 1, 2011).

23.
Song, T.Y. and Lee, N.Y., A Study on Suitability Evaluation for Design of Soft Control and Safety Console in Advanced Control Room of Korea Nuclear Power Plants, Journal of Chungnam Science, 31, 45-54, 2004.

24.
URNRC, 10CFR26, Fitness-For-Duty (FFD) Program, 2009.

25.
URNRC, Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines, NUREC- 0700, rev.2, 2011.