JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Developing Visual Complexity Metrics for Automotive Human-Machine Interfaces
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Developing Visual Complexity Metrics for Automotive Human-Machine Interfaces
Kim, Ji Man; Hwangbo, Hwan; Ji, Yong Gu;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to develop visual complexity metrics based on theoretical bases. Background: With the development of IT technologies, drivers process a large amount of information caused by automotive human-machine interface (HMI), such as a cluster, a head-up display, and a center-fascia. In other words, these systems are becoming more complex and dynamic than traditional driving systems. Especially, these changes can lead to the increase of visual demands. Thus, a concept and tool is required to evaluate the complicated systems. Method: We reviewed prior studies in order to analyze the visual complexity. Based on complexity studies and human perceptual characteristics, the dimensions characterizing the visual complexity were determined and defined. Results: Based on a framework and complexity dimensions, a set of metrics for quantifying the visual complexity was developed. Conclusion: We suggest metrics in terms of perceived visual complexity that can evaluate the in-vehicle displays. Application: This study can provide the theoretical bases in order to evaluate complicated systems. In addition, it can quantitatively measure the visual complexity of In-vehicle information system and be helpful to design in terms of preventing risks, such as human error and distraction.
 Keywords
In-vehicle Information system (IVIS);Perceived Visual Complexity (PVC);Human visual perception;Human-machine Interface;Instrument cluster;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Alemerien, K. & Magel, K., GUIEvaluator: A Metric-tool for Evaluating the Complexity of Graphical User Interfaces., 2014 International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering, 2014.

2.
Bengtsson, P., Grane, C. & Isaksson, J., Haptic/graphic interface for in-vehicle comfort functions-a simulator study and an experimental study. In Haptic, Audio and Visual Environments and Their Applications, 2003. HAVE 2003. Proceedings. The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 25-29). IEEE, 2003, September.

3.
Burnett, G.E. & Mark Porter, J., Ubiquitous computing within cars: designing controls for non-visual use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(4), 521-531, 2001. crossref(new window)

4.
Castro, C., Human factors of visual and cognitive performance in driving. CRC Press, 2008.

5.
Cummings, M.L., Sasangohar, F., Thornburg, K.M., Xing, J. & D'Agostino, A., Human-system interface complexity and opacity part i: literature review. Massachusettes Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2010a.

6.
Cummings, M.L., Sasangohar, F., Thornburg, K.M., Xing, J. & D'Agostino, A., Human-system interface complexity and opacity part ii: Methods and Tools to Assess HIS Complexity. Massachusettes Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2010b.

7.
Dingus, T.A., Hulse, M.C., Mollenhauer, M.A., Fleischman, R.N., Mcgehee, D.V. & Manakkal, N., Effects of age, system experience, and navigation technique on driving with an advanced traveler information system. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39(2), 177-199, 1997.

8.
Dressel, J. & Atchley, P., Cellular phone use while driving: A methodological checklist for investigating dual-task costs. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 11(5), 347-361, 2008.

9.
Edmonds, B., What is Complexity?-The philosophy of complexity per se with application to some examples in evolution. The evolution of complexity, 1995.

10.
Fu, F., Chiu, S.Y. & Su, C.H., Measuring the screen complexity of web pages. In Human Interface and the Management of Information. Interacting in Information Environments (pp. 720-729). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.

11.
GHSA. Distracted Driving: What Research Shows and What States Can Do. Governors Highway Safety Association, 2011.

12.
Goldstein, E., Sensation and perception. Cengage Learning, 2013.

13.
Ham, D.H., Park, J. & Jung, W., A framework-based approach to identifying and organizing the complexity factors of human-system interaction. Systems Journal, IEEE, 5(2), 213-222, 2011. crossref(new window)

14.
Hasler, D. & Suesstrunk, S.E., Measuring colorfulness in natural images. In Electronic Imaging 2003 (pp. 87-95). International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2003, June.

15.
Henneman, R.L. & Rouse, W.B., On measuring the complexity of monitoring and controlling large-scale systems. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 16(2), 193-207, 1986. crossref(new window)

16.
Heylighen, F., The growth of structural and functional complexity during evolution. The evolution of complexity, 17-44, 1999.

17.
Kemps, E., Effects of complexity on visuo-spatial working memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11(3), 335-356, 1999. crossref(new window)

18.
Maciej, J. & Vollrath, M., Comparison of manual vs. speech-based interaction with in-vehicle information systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(5), 924-930, 2009. crossref(new window)

19.
Oliva, A., Mack, M.L., Shrestha, M. & Peeper, A., Identifying the perceptual dimensions of visual complexity of scenes. In Proc. of 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago, 2004.

20.
Palmer, S.E., Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. The MIT press, 1999.

21.
Reinecke, K., Yeh, T., Miratrix, L., Mardiko, R., Zhao, Y., Liu, J. & Gajos, K.Z., Predicting users' first impressions of website aesthetics with a quantification of perceived visual complexity and colorfulness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2049-2058). ACM, 2013, April.

22.
Reinecke, K. & Gajos, K.Z., Quantifying visual preferences around the world. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 11-20). ACM, 2014, April.

23.
Treisman, A.M. & Gelade, G., A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive psychology, 12(1), 97-136, 1980. crossref(new window)

24.
Tullis, T.S., The formatting of alphanumeric displays: A review and analysis. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 25(6), 657-682, 1983.

25.
Wertheimer, M., Laws of organization in perceptual forms. A Source Book of Gestalt psychology, 1923.

26.
Wickens, C.D., Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science, 3(2), 159-177, 2002. crossref(new window)

27.
Xing, J., Measures of information complexity and the implications for automation design (No. DOT/FAA/AM-04/17). Federal Aviation Administration Oklahoma City OK Civil Aeromedical INST, 2004.

28.
Xing, J. & Manning, C.A., Complexity and automation displays of air traffic control: Literature review and analysis (No. DOT/FAA/AM-05/4). Federal Aviation Administration Oklahoma City OK Civil Aeromedical INST, 2005.

29.
Xing, J., Information complexity in air traffic control displays (pp. 797-806). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.

30.
Xing, J., Designing questionnaires for controlling and managing information complexity in visual displays (No. DOT/FAA/AM-08/18). Federal Aviation Administration Oklahoma City OK Civil Aerospace Medical INST, 2008.