JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Suggestions for More Reliable Measurement of Korean Nuclear Power Industry Safety Culture
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Suggestions for More Reliable Measurement of Korean Nuclear Power Industry Safety Culture
Lee, Dhong Ha;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to suggest some improvement ideas based on the validity and the reliability analyses of the current safety culture measurement method applied to the Korean nuclear power industry. Background: Wrong safety culture is known as one of the major causes of the disasters such as the space shuttle Columbia disaster or the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident. Assessment of safety culture of an organization is important to build a safer organizational environment as well as to identify the risks hidden in the organization. Method: A face validity of the current safety culture measurement method was analyzed by comparison of the key factors of safety culture in the Korean nuclear power industry with those factors reviewed in the previous studies. The current interview method was analyzed to identify the problems which degrade the consistency of evaluation. Results: Most safety culture factors reviewed in the literatures are covered in the list of the Korean nuclear power industry safety culture factors. However the unstructured questions used in the interview may result in inconsistency of safety culture evaluation among interviewers. Conclusion: This study suggests some examples which might improve the consistency of interviewers' evaluation on safety culture such as a post interview evaluation form. Application: An extended post interview evaluation form might help to increase the accuracy of the interviewing method for Korean nuclear industry safety culture evaluation.
 Keywords
Nuclear power;Safety culture;Safety culture factor;Interview;Face validity;Reliability;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Ball, P.W. and Scotney, V., Approaches to Safety Culture Enhancement, Daresbury, U.K., British Nuclear Fuels, Ltd., 1998.

2.
Hale, A. and Hovden, J., Management and Culture: the Third Age of Safety. A Review of Approaches to Organizational Aspects of Safety, Health, and Environment. In A. Feyer and A. Williamson (Eds.), Occupational Injury: Risk Prevention, and Intervention, Taylor & Francis, London, 129-166, 1998.

3.
Health and Safety Executive (HSE), A Review of the Safety Culture and Safety Climate Literature for the Development of the Safety Culture Toolkit, HSE Research Report 367, London, HSE Books, 2005.

4.
KHNP-CRI, Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment Report for Hanul Nuclear Power Plant 3, Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co., 2013.

5.
KHNP-CRI, Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment Report for Hanul Nuclear Power Plant 2, Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co., 2015.

6.
Lee, Y.H., A revisit to the recent human error events in nuclear power plants focused to the organizational and safety culture, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 32(1), 117-124, 2013. crossref(new window)

7.
Muniz, B.F., Peon, J.M.M. and Ordas, C.J.V., Safety culture: analysis and the causal relationships between its key dimensions, Journal of Safety Research, 38, 627-641, 2007. crossref(new window)

8.
Olive, C., O'Conner, M.T. and Mannan, S.M., Relationship of safety culture and process safety, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 130, 133-140, 2006. crossref(new window)

9.
Pidgeon, N.F. and O'Leary, M., Organizational Safety Culture: Implications for Aviation Practice. In N. Johnston, N. McDonald and R. Fuller (Eds.), Aviation Psychology in Practice, 21-43, Aldershot, Avebury, 1994.

10.
Reason, J., Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, Burlington, VT, Ashgate, 1997.

11.
Schultz, D.P. and Schultz, S.E., Psychology and Industry Today, 4th ed., Macmillan, 1986.

12.
Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P., Jenkins, D. and Walker, G., Human Factors in the Design and Evaluation of Central Control Room Operations, CRC Press, 2010.