JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Loss of Corrected Visual Acuity According to Different Meridional Visual Acuity in Astigmatic Eyes
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Loss of Corrected Visual Acuity According to Different Meridional Visual Acuity in Astigmatic Eyes
Jo, Na Young; Kim, Sang-Yeob; Moon, Byeong-Yeon; Cho, Hyun Gug;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to investigate the difference of meridional visual acuity and the loss of corrected visual acuity (VA) in order to emphasis the importance of astigmatic correction. Methods: 64 subjects (122 eyes) aged participated in this study. After full correction of astigmatic refractive error, VA was measured in which the direction of the slit filter was matched with astigmatic axis and to the astigmatic axis. Results: 52 eyes showed no difference in VA between the two direction. However 70 eyes had difference VA between them. 14 out of 52 eyes and 24 out of 70 eyes had under 1.0 in monocular VA. The astigmatic degree was higher in the existence of VA difference between the two direction than non-existence. The difference is higher with under 1.0 monocular VA. Monocular VA is closely related to the focal line having better VA in the principal focal line. Glasses replacement period was analyzed as 6~12 months for the preservation of better VA. Conclusions: The final glasses prescription has to be given with full correction because continued under-correction for astigmatism causes meridional VA difference.
 Keywords
Meridional amblyopia;Astigmatism;Slit filter;Visual acuity;Anterior-posterior focal lines;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
von Noorden GK. Binocular vision and ocular motility: theory and management of strabismus, 5th Ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1996;216-254.

2.
Bennett AG. An historical review of optometric principles and techniques. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1986;6(1):3-21. crossref(new window)

3.
Chung TM, Choi CK, Choi O. Relationship between visual acuity and refractive error in myopia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1977;18(4):305-314.

4.
Brookman KE. Refractive management of ametropia, 1st Ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996;77.

5.
Kim JH, Kim IS. A Study on the relationship between the disc of least confusion and corrected vision of astigmatism. J Korean Opthalmic Opt Soc. 2008;13(2):51-57.

6.
Jampolsky A, Flom BC, Weymouth FW, Moses LE. Unequal corrected visual acuity as related to anisometropia. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1955;54(6):893-905. crossref(new window)

7.
Mein J, Trimble R. Diagnosis and management of ocular motility disorders, 2nd Ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991;99-211.

8.
Mitchell DE, Freeman RD, Millodot M, Haegerstrom G. Meridional amblyopia: evidence for modification of the human visual system by early visual experience. Vision Res. 1973;13(3):535-558. crossref(new window)

9.
von Noorden GK. Binocular vision and ocular motility: theory and management of strabismus, 4th Ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1990;153-161.

10.
Blackmore C, Van Sluyters RC. Experimental analysis of amblyopia and strabismus. Br J Ophthalmol. 1974;58(3): 176-182. crossref(new window)

11.
Kim SM, Kim MS, Lee DB. Results of treatment in childhood with high hyperopic or astigmatic amblyopia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1991;32(9):809-815.

12.
Lee WS, Ye KH. A study on the prevalence analysis of astigmatism and the effect of astigmatic refractive power on corrected vision in growing children and the young. J Korean J Vis Sci. 2015;17(3):249-257.

13.
Choi HK, Kwon JY. Visual acuity in childhood astigmatism. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1998;39(9):2160-2164.