Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Accommodation Control by Applying Fogging Method in Subjective Refraction and Auto-Refraction in Ametropia
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Accommodation Control by Applying Fogging Method in Subjective Refraction and Auto-Refraction in Ametropia
Lee, Kang-Cheon; Kim, Sang-Yeob; Cho, Hyun Gug; Yu, Dong-Sik; Moon, Byeong-Yeon;
  PDF(new window)
Purpose: To analyze the effect of accommodative control and change values between subjective refraction (SR) and auto-refraction (AR) according to application of fogging after accommodative stimulation depending on ametropia type. Methods: Myopic ametropia 76 eyes and hyperopic ametropia 52 eyes participated for this study. SR and AR values measured by three test conditions (Before accommodative stimulation; Before AS, After accommodative stimulation; After AS, and After application of fogging; After AF) were compared, respectively. Results: In myopic eyes, (-)spherical power by SR and AR in After AS test was significantly increased as compared to Before AS test, (-)spherical power in After AF test was decreased to the level of Before AS test. The differences of spherical power between SR and AR were highly measured by SR in After AS test, and highly measured by AR in After AF test, respectively. In hyperopic eyes, (+)spherical power of SR significantly decreased in After AS test compared to Before AS test, more (+)spherical power was detected in After AF test compared to Before AS test. (+)spherical power of AR have no significant difference between Before AS and After AS test, but more (+)spherical power was detected in After AF test compared to Before AS test. The differences of (+)spherical power between SR and AR were significant in all test conditions. Among 52 eyes which were measured as hyperopic ametropia, 7 eyes were measured as myopia by SR in After AS test. In case of AR, 25 eyes among 52 eyes were mismeasured as myopia of ranges from -0.25 D to -1.25 D in Before AS test, 26 eyes in After AS test, and 19 eyes in After AF test were mismeasured as myopia of ranges from -0.25 D to -1.25 D. Conclusions: Regardless of ametropia type, accommodative control by After AF test was effective on both refraction process. However, in auto-refraction for hyperopic eyes, the misdetermined proportion of refractive error's type was high due to consistent accommodative intervention in all test condition. Therefore, in order to obtain an accurate value of refractive errors, full correction should be determined by subjective refraction process after fogging method.
Accommodative control;Fogging;Subjective refraction;Auto-refraction;Hyperopic ametropia;Myopic ametropia;
 Cited by
비정시안에서 모형안을 이용한 안축길이 계산의 정확성,김형수;조현국;문병연;유동식;

대한시과학회지, 2016. vol.18. 4, pp.455-463 crossref(new window)
Correlation between the Two Tests and Changes in Measured Values According to Accommodative Stimulation and Fogging in the Subjective and Auto-Refraction, Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society, 2017, 22, 2, 175  crossref(new windwow)
Moon NJ, Kim JC, Koo BS. The study on the necessity of cycloplegic refraction in school children. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1988;29(3):377-385.

Kim YS, An HS, and Jin YH. A study about the accuracy of automated refraction. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1995;36(12):2207-2212.

McBrien NA, Millodot M. Clinical evaluation of the Canon Autoref R-1. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985; 62(11):786-792. crossref(new window)

Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Tsujimura S. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21(2):101-107. crossref(new window)

Wesemann W, Rassow B. Automatic infrared refractors-a comparative study. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987;64(8): 627-638. crossref(new window)

Joubert L, Harris WF. Excess of autorefraction over subjective refraction: dependence on age. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74(6):439-444. crossref(new window)

Lee JW, Lee KS, Hong HK. Research of difference between the refractive powers by autorefractometer and the prescription using phoropter. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2014;19(2):231-237. crossref(new window)

Choong YF, Chen AH, and Goh PP. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142(1):68-74. crossref(new window)

Chat SW, Edwards MH. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21(2):87-100. crossref(new window)

Steele G, Ireland D, Block S. Cycloplegic autorefraction results in pre-school children using the Nikon Retinomax Plus and the Welch Allyn SureSight. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80(8):573-577. crossref(new window)

Salvesen S, Kohler M. Automated refraction. A comparative study of automated refraction with the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor and retinoscopy. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1991;69(3):342-346.

Cordonnier M, Dramaix M, Kallay O, de Bideran M. How accurate is the hand-held refractor Retinomax(R) in measuring cycloplegic refraction: a further evaluation. Strabismus. 1998;6(3):133-142. crossref(new window)

Kinge B, Midelfart A, Jacobsen G. Clinical evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 autorefractor and the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(1):35-39. crossref(new window)

Benjamin WJ. Borish's clinical refraction, 2nd Ed. St. Louis: Butterworth-Heinemann. 2006;798-799.

Kang HS. Introduction to Optometry, 6th Ed. Seoul: Shinkwang publishing company. 2011;236.

Owens DA, Wolf-Kelly K. Near work, visual fatigue, and variations of oculomotor tonus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28(4):743-749.

Ehrlich DL. Near vision stress: vergence adaptation and accommodative fatigue. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1987; 7(4):353-357. crossref(new window)

Oh SY. A study on refraction by fogging and unfogging method for hyperoic refractive errors. MS Thesis. Konyang University, Daejeon. 2014;27-51.

Gallagher JT, Citek K. A Badal optical stimulator for the Canon Autoref R-1 optometer. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72(4): 276-278. crossref(new window)

Rosenfield M, Gilmartin B. Effect of target proximity on the open-loop accommodative response. Optom Vis Sci. 1990;67(2):74-79. crossref(new window)

Yang SW, Lee NY, Kim SY. The effect of cycloplegia on vision and stereopsis: comparison between before and after cycloplegia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006;47(9): 1454-1458.