JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Study of Masking Effect of Soft Contact Lenses on Cornea after Refractive Surgery
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Study of Masking Effect of Soft Contact Lenses on Cornea after Refractive Surgery
Moon, Ye-Rim; Park, Hyung-Min; Chu, Byoung-Sun;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated the masking effect of the hydrogel lens and silicone hydrogel lens on the cornea with refractive surgery and without surgery. Methods: 24 university students (means age: ) without refractive surgery (12, control group) and with refractive surgery (LASIK: 8, LASEK: 4, experimental group) participated in the study. Mean refractive errors of right eyes were -2.73 D for control group and -0.24 D for experimental group. The differences in the refractive power and corneal topography map between pre- and post-wearing the -3.00 D lenses were compared, and 2 kinds of hydrogel contact lenses (0.89 Mpa, 0.49 Mpa) and 2 kinds of silicone hydrogel lenses (1.5 Mpa, 0.8 Mpa) were used for -3.00 D lenses. NVision-K5001 (Shin nippon, Japan) was used to measure the refractive power and Keratograph 5M (Oculus, Germany) to measure the corneal topography map change. Results: Variations in the refractive power increased to the plus direction in the experimental group after wearing soft contact lenses. The corneal topography map showed significant changes on the both groups after wearing soft contact lenses (p<0.05). However there were no significant differences in the refractive power and corneal topography map variations by lens materials. Conclusions: Wearing soft contact lenses showed corneal topography map changes. Especially wearing soft contact lenses on the flat cornea after corneal refractive surgery showed greater corneal power changes. Therefore, it should pay attention to refractive change in case of prescribing soft contact lenses to patients with corneal refractive surgery.
 Keywords
Silicone hydrogel contact lens;Modulus;Corneal refractive surgery;Irregular astigmatism;Corneal topography;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Hepsen IF, Evereklioglu C, Bayramlar H. The effect of reading and near work on the development of myopia in emmetropic boys: a prospective, controlled, three year follow up study. Vision Res. 2001;41(19):2511-2520. crossref(new window)

2.
Chung SK, Kang SB, Kim HK, Rho CR, Paik JS, Lee NY. Explanation of ophthalmic terminology, 1st Ed. Goyang: Naewaehaksool, 2010;177.

3.
Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Eye examination, 2008. https://knhanes.cdc.go.kr/knhanes/sub03/sub03_02_02.do(1 October 2015).

4.
Lee JH, Lee KS, Chu BS. Contact lens prescribing pattern in Korean during 2010 to 2013. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2014;19(3):323-329. crossref(new window)

5.
Ward MA. 20 years and beyond: a brief history of modern lenses. Contact Lens Spectr. 2006;21(6):49-51.

6.
French K. Why is modulus important?, 2001. http://www.siliconehydrogels.org/editorials/oct_07.asp(12 October 2015).

7.
Trokel SL, Srinivasan R, Braren B. Excimer laser surgery of the cornea. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;96(6):710-715. crossref(new window)

8.
Ali JL, Belda JI, Osman AA, Shalaby AM. Topographyguided laser in situ keratomileusis (TOPOLINK) to correct irregular astigmatism after previous refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2003;19(5):516-527.

9.
Sandoval HP, Castro LEF, Vroman DT, Solomon KD. Refractive surgery survey 2004. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):221-233. crossref(new window)

10.
Ang RT, Dartt DA, Tsubota K. Dry Eye after refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001;12(4):318-322. crossref(new window)

11.
Jabbur NS, Sakatani K, O’Brien TP. Survey of complications and recommendations for management in dissatisfied patients seeking a consultation after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(9):1867-1874. crossref(new window)

12.
Villa C, Gutirrez R, Jimnez JR, Gonzalez-Mijome JM. Night vision disturbances after successful LASIK surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(8):1031-1037. crossref(new window)

13.
Zadnik K. Contact lens management of patients who have had unsuccessful refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1999;10(4):260-263. crossref(new window)

14.
Heiting G. Contact lenses after LASIK or other refractive surgery, 2015. http://www.allaboutvision.com/contacts/postopcontact-lenses.htm(16 October 2015).

15.
Lim L, Siow KL, Chong JS, Tan DT. Contact lens wear after photorefractive keratectomy: comparison between rigid gas permeable and soft contact lenses. CLAO J. 1999;25(4):222-227.

16.
Snyder C, Talley DK. Masking of astigmatism with selected spherical soft contact lenses. J Am Optom Assoc. 1989; 60(10):728-731.

17.
Chi J. Masking irregular corneal graft astigmatism with silicon hydrogel contact lenses, 2013. http://www.cclsa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/SiHy-for-PK.pdf(4 November 2015).

18.
Chou B, Wachier BS. Soft contact lenses for irregular astigmatism after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2001;17(6):692-695.

19.
Negishi K, Kumanomido T, Utsumi Y, Tsubota K. Effect of higher-order aberrations on visual function in keratoconic eyes with a rigid gas permeable contact lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(6):924-929. crossref(new window)

20.
Chen M, Yoon G. Posterior corneal aberrations and their compensation effects on anterior corneal aberrations in keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49(12): 5645-5652. crossref(new window)

21.
Snyder C, Talley DK. Masking of astigmatism with selected spherical soft contact lenses. J Am Optom Assoc. 1989; 60(10):728-731.

22.
Tomidokoro A, Soya K, Miyata K, Armin B, Tanaka S, Amano S, Oshika T. Corneal irregular astigmatism and contrast sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(12):2209-2212. crossref(new window)

23.
Fan-paul NI, Li J, Miller JS, Florakis GJ. Night vision disturbances after corneal refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47(6):533-546. crossref(new window)

24.
Keeffe JE, Jin CF, Weih LM, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Vision impairment and older drivers: who’s driving?. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(10):1118-1121. crossref(new window)