JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Ethically Related Decisions in Different Scenarios of Medical School Applicants for Graduate-Entry Program
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Korean Medical Education Review
  • Volume 18, Issue 2,  2016, pp.90-98
  • Publisher : 연세대학교 의과대학 의학교육학과
  • DOI : 10.17496/kmer.2016.18.2.90
 Title & Authors
Ethically Related Decisions in Different Scenarios of Medical School Applicants for Graduate-Entry Program
Kim, Do-Hwan; Kim, Eun Jeong; Hwang, Jinyoung; Shin, Jwa-Seop; Lee, Seunghee;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Assessment tools for non-academic qualities such as ethics frequently employ hypothetical scenarios to lay out a contextual framework underlying the corresponding criteria of assessment. Due to the context-specific nature of the assessment criteria, details of the scenarios become very important in obtaining accurate results. This study aims to explore how medical school applicants differ in ethical decision making depending on the types of ethical dilemma scenarios, and how they correlate with academic achievements after admission. In 2014, all 82 applicants invited for an admission interview for a graduate-entry program were asked to complete a questionnaire comprised of 13 hypothetical scenarios. There were three domains (unethical business decisions, unethical academic decisions, and sexual quid pro quos) and participants were made to choose between the profitable-but-unethical choice or the unprofitable-but-ethical choice, using a four-point Likert-type scale. On average, tendencies toward unethical decisions were lowest for sexual favors (), and highest for gaining academic advantages (). Unethical decisions for academic advantages and sexual benefits showed significant correlation respectively with the female gender and those who graduated from overseas universities. In addition, the propensity for choosing unethical academic decisions was significantly correlated with high academic achievements in medical school (r
 Keywords
Ethical decision making;Hypothetical scenario;Medical school applicants;Graduate-entry program;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The prediction of honesty-humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality. J Res Pers, 42(5), 1216-1228. crossref(new window)

2.
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1997). Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ, 314(7080), 572. crossref(new window)

3.
Bore, M., Munro, D., & Powis, D. (2009). A comprehensive model for the selection of medical students. Med Teach, 31(12), 1066-1072. crossref(new window)

4.
Choi, J., Son, S. L., Kim, S. H., Kim, H., Hong, J. Y., & Lee, M. S. (2015). The prevalence of burnout and the related factors among some medical students in Korea. Korean J Med Educ, 27(4), 301-308. crossref(new window)

5.
Cox, M., Irby, D. M., Stern, D. T., & Papadakis, M. (2006). The developing physician: Becoming a professional. N Engl J Med, 355(17), 1794-1799. crossref(new window)

6.
Englander, R., Cameron, T., Ballard, A. J., Dodge, J., Bull, J., & Aschenbrener, C. A. (2013). Toward a common taxonomy of competency domains for the health professions and competencies for physicians. Acad Med, 88(8), 1088-1094. crossref(new window)

7.
Eva, K. W. (2003). On the generality of specificity. Med Educ, 37(7), 587-588. crossref(new window)

8.
Eva, K. W., & Macala, C. (2014). Multiple mini-interview test characteristics: ‘Tis better to ask candidates to recall than to imagine. Med Educ, 48(6), 604-613. crossref(new window)

9.
Eva, K. W., Rosenfeld, J., Reiter, H. I., & Norman, G. R. (2004). An admissions OSCE: The multiple mini-interview. Med Educ, 38(3), 314-326. crossref(new window)

10.
Keller, A. C., Smith, K. T., & Smith, L. M. (2007). Do gender, educational level, religiosity, and work experience affect the ethical decision-making of US accountants? Crit Perspect Account, 18(3), 299-314. crossref(new window)

11.
Kim, D. H., Hwang, J., Kim, E. J., Yoon, H. B., Shin, J. S., & Lee, S. (2014). How different are premedical freshmen who enter after introducing a multiple mini-interview in a medical school? Korean J Med Educ, 26(2), 87-98. crossref(new window)

12.
Kim, D. H., Kim, E. J., Hwang, J., Shin, J. S., & Lee, S. (2015). What is the current orientation of undergraduate medical education in Korea? Korean J Med Educ, 27(2), 87-98. crossref(new window)

13.
Knorr, M., & Hissbach, J. (2014). Multiple mini-interviews: Same concept, different approaches. Med Educ, 48(12), 1157-1175. crossref(new window)

14.
Kobayashi, E., & Fukushima, M. (2012). Gender, social bond, and academic cheating in Japan. Sociol Inq, 82(2), 282-304. crossref(new window)

15.
Koenig, T. W., Parrish, S. K., Terregino, C. A., Williams, J. P., Dunleavy, D. M., & Volsch, J. M. (2013). Core personal competencies important to entering students' success in medical school: what are they and how could they be assessed early in the admission process? Acad Med, 88(5), 603-613. crossref(new window)

16.
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivar Behav Res, 39(2), 329-358. crossref(new window)

17.
Lim, V. K., & See, S. K. (2001). Attitudes toward, and intentions to report, academic cheating among students in Singapore. Ethics Behav, 11(3), 261-274. crossref(new window)

18.
Loewenstein, G., Sah, S., & Cain, D. M. (2012). The unintended consequences of conflict of interest disclosure. JAMA, 307(7), 669-670. crossref(new window)

19.
Lowe, M., Kerridge, I., Bore, M., Munro, D., & Powis, D. (2001). Is it possible to assess the "ethics" of medical school applicants? J Med Ethics, 27(6), 404-408. crossref(new window)

20.
Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. J Educ Bus, 77(2), 69-77. crossref(new window)

21.
O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996-2003. J Bus Ethics, 59(4), 375-413. crossref(new window)

22.
Okazaki, S. (2002). Influences of culture on Asian Americans’ sexuality. J Sex Res, 39(1), 34-41. crossref(new window)

23.
Patterson, F., Ashworth, V., Zibarras, L., Coan, P., Kerrin, M., & O’Neill, P. (2012). Evaluations of situational judgement tests to assess nonacademic attributes in selection. Med Educ, 46(9), 850-868. crossref(new window)

24.
Pau, A., Jeevaratnam, K., Chen, Y. S., Fall, A. A., Khoo, C., & Nadarajah, V. D. (2013). The multiple mini-interview (MMI) for student selection in health professions training: A systematic review. Med Teach, 35(12), 1027-1041. crossref(new window)

25.
Poole, G. (2012). The culturally sculpted self in self-directed learning. Med Educ, 46(8), 735-737. crossref(new window)

26.
Rennie, S., & Rudland, J. (2003). Differences in medical students’ attitudes to academic misconduct and reported behaviour across the years: A questionnaire study. J Med Ethics, 29(2), 97-102. crossref(new window)

27.
Roh, M. S., Jeon, H. J., Kim, H., Han, S. K., & Hahm, B. J. (2010). The prevalence and impact of depression among medical students: A nationwide cross-sectional study in South Korea. Acad Med, 85(8), 1384-1390. crossref(new window)

28.
Simkin, M. G., & McLeod, A. (2010). Why do college students cheat?. J Bus Ethics, 94(3), 441-453. crossref(new window)

29.
Sobral, D. T. (2004). What kind of motivation drives medical students’ learning quests?. Med Educ, 38(9), 950-957. crossref(new window)

30.
Swick, H. M. (2000). Toward a normative definition of medical professionalism. Acad Med, 75(6), 612-616. crossref(new window)

31.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ, 2, 53. crossref(new window)

32.
Taylor, P. J., & Small, B. (2002). Asking applicants what they would do versus what they did do: A meta-analytic comparison of situational and past behaviour employment interview questions. J Occup Organ Psychol, 75(3), 277-294. crossref(new window)

33.
Teherani, A., Hodgson, C. S., Banach, M., & Papadakis, M. A. (2005). Domains of unprofessional behavior during medical school associated with future disciplinary action by a state medical board. Acad Med, 80(10), S17-S20. crossref(new window)

34.
Uijtdehaage, S., & Parker, N. (2011). Enhancing the reliability of the multiple mini-interview for selecting prospective health care leaders. Acad Med, 86(8), 1032-1039. crossref(new window)

35.
Vengoechea, J., Moreno, S., & Ruiz, A. (2008). Misconduct in medical students. Dev World Bioeth, 8(3), 219-225. crossref(new window)

36.
Wilkinson, T. J., Wade, W. B., & Knock, L. D. (2009). A blueprint to assess professionalism: Results of a systematic review. Acad Med, 84(5), 551-558. crossref(new window)

37.
Zaidi, N. B., Swoboda, C., Wang, L. L., & Manuel, R. S. (2014). Variance in attributes assessed by the multiple mini-interview. Med Teach, 36(9), 794-798. crossref(new window)