Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Classifying and Implementing Different Types of Contradiction Resolution Strategies in TRIZ
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Classifying and Implementing Different Types of Contradiction Resolution Strategies in TRIZ
Choi, Sungwoon;
  PDF(new window)
The study proposes multiple TRIZ contradiction solution strategies for addressing PC (Physical Contradiction) and TC (Technical Contradiction) by implementing TRIZ cause-and-effect tree. The problem associated with TC of the ends is solved by PC of means which employs a causal relationship between causes and effects. The TRIZ contradiction solution strategies demonstrated in this research are classified into 3 types of combined strategy as follows: 1. To-Be PC and AS-Is PC, 2.To-Be PC and As-Is TC, 3.As-Is PC and To-Be TC. The combined strategy of To-Be PC and As-Is PC is similar to a divide-and-conquer technique. This strategy adopts parallel strategies using 4 separation principles in time, in space, between parts and the whole, and upon condition of two reversed-PCs. Moreover, its application elucidates the conflict relationship of two TCs from the study. The integrated 4 separation principles and 40 inventive principles present an effective synergy effect from the combination, and further addresses the problems in the TRIZ contradiction resolution strategies. Combined strategy of To-Be PC and As-Is TC implements the 40 inventive principles that To-Be PC of the means resolves the As-Is TC of the ends. Combined strategy of As-Is PC and To-Be TC also uses inventive principles to the As-Is PC of the means to solve the To-Be TC of the ends. In addition, propositional and logical relationship of necessary and sufficient conditions between TC and PC is used to support the validity of 3 TRIZ contradiction solution strategies. In addition, 3 other strategies of necessary and sufficient conditions validate the contraposition relationship of the truth table. This study discusses TRIZ case studies from National Quality Circle Contest from the years between 2011 and 2014 to provide the usage guidelines of TRIZ contradiction solutions for quality purposes. Examining analysis from the case studies and investigating combined strategies allows the users to obtain comprehensive understanding.
TRIZ;PC;TC;Casual Relationship;Contradiction Solution Strategies;4 Seperation Principles;40 Inventive Principles;Necessary and Sufficient Conditions;Truth Table;Case Studies;
 Cited by
Ariyur K.B. (2011), "A Mathematical Foundation for TRIZ Methods : Resolving Contradictions and Idealization", 2011 IEEE International Systems Conference, April : 409-411.

Choi S. (2015), "Review and Application of Creative Problem-Solving Processes for Technical and Physical Contradictions Using Cause-and-Effect Contradiction Tree and Integrated Principles of TRIZ", Joural of the Korea Safety Management and Science, 17(2) :215-228.

Conradie I., Consultores I., Chile S. (2005), "TOC and TRIZ : Using a Dual-Methodological Approach to Solve a Forest Harvesting Problem", The TRIZ Joural, March.

Cox III J., Schleier J. (2010), Theory of Constraints Handbook, MeGraw Hill Professional.

Ean K. C. (2005), Thinking Smart : Applying the Theory of Constraints in Development Thinking Skills, Coronet Books Inc.

Feduko J. (2014) Behind the Cloud : Enhancig Logical Thinking, 2 Edition, TOC Strategic Solutions.

Gensler H. J.(2012), Introduction to Logic, 2 Edition, Routledge.

Goldratt E.M. (1994), It's Not Luck, North River Press.

Goldratt E.M., Goldratt - Ashlag E. (2012), The Choice, Revised Edition, The North River Press Publishing Corporation.

Hipple J. (2012), The Ideal Result, Springer.

Hynix Learning Center (2010), TRIZ User, Hynix Semiconductor.

Hyun J., Park C. (2014), "Logical Interpretation about Problem Types and Solution Stratigies of the Butterfly Model for the Automation of Contradiction-based Problem Solving", 2014 International Conference of Teaching, Assessement and Learning, December : 236-241.

Kishira Y. (2008), TOC Thinking Process, Diamond Inc.

Li G., Tan R., Liu Z., Zhang H.(2006), "Idea Generation for Fuzzy Front End Using TRIZ and TOC", 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, June : 590-594.

Lin L., Dubois S., Guio R. D., Rasovska I. (2014), "An Algorithm to Extract the Generalized Physical Contrandiction", 2014 International Conference on Innovative Design and Manufacturing, August : 129-135.

Lucus J. (2005), Broaden the Vision and Narrow the Focus : Managing in a World of Paradox, Praeger.

Maimon O., Horowitz R. (1999), Sufficient Conditions for Inventive Solutions", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernatics-Part : Applications and Review, 29(3) : 349-361. crossref(new window)

Mann D., Stratton R. (2000), "Physical Contradictions and Evaporating Clouds", The TRIZ Joural, April.

Mann D. (2007), Hands on Systematic Innovation for Business & Management, IFR Press.

Orloff M. A. (20060, Inventive Thinking Through TRIZ, 2 Edition, Springer.

Pfeifer T., Tillmann M. (2004), "Innovative Process Chain Optimization - Utilizing the Tools of TRIZ and TOC for Manufacturing", The TRIZ Journal, February.

Pospesel H. (1999), Introduction to Logic : Propositional Logic, 3 Edition, Pearson.

Rantanen K., Domb E. (2007), Simplified TRIZ, 2 Edition, Auerbach Publications.

Shroeder-Saulnier D. (2014), The Power of Paradox : Harness the Energy of Competing Ideas to Uncover Radically Innovative Solutions, Career Press.

Stratton R., Mann D.(2003), "Systematic Innovation and the Underlying Principles Behind TRIZ and TOC", Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 139 : 120-126. crossref(new window)

Stratton R., Warburton R.D.H.(2003), "Managing the Trade-off Implication of Global Supply", International Journal of Production Economics, 103 : 667-679.