Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Development of a Gifted Behavior Checklist Based on the Observation Probability and Importance of the Behavior in Class
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Development of a Gifted Behavior Checklist Based on the Observation Probability and Importance of the Behavior in Class
Lee, In-Ho; Han, Ki-Soon;
  PDF(new window)
This research focuses on the development of gifted child behavior checklist which feasibly has application on the nation-wide gifted children observation-recommendation method. Corresponding measure has significance as it reflects actual observations of teachers teaching gifted children first-hand and involves measure of importance regarding each characteristic. An open survey on gifted children behavior characteristics lists and specific behavior patterns has been acquired from teachers in gifted education, and the checklist was developed through expert group review, pre-test, and confirmatory factor analysis process. The former checklists have shown several difficulties on application of observation-recommendation on the field due to behaviors that can't be observed in school, less important behaviors, and collide and duplicate behaviors etc. With regard to such problems, problematic clauses were removed based on the observation probability and importance of the behaviors. Ultimately, total of 32 behavior characteristic checklist consisting of ten sub factors(logical thinking, high achievement, originality, perfectionism, creative problem solving, curiosity, task commitment, conversation ability, creativity, passion) and two to three questions on each factor had been drawn. Through internal consistency test and item-total score correlation, each item of the measure has been analyzed to be consistently evaluating corresponding variables. In addition, the result of confirmatory factor analysis showed every item to be weighed appropriately on its sub-factor, strongly suggesting its feasibility on observation-recommendation of elementary gifted children as an appropriate checklist.
Gifted behavior characteristics;Checklist;Observation-recommendation method;
 Cited by
고민석, 박병태 (2011). 영재 관찰.추천 과정에서 담임교사의 영재교육 전문성 인식 수준에 따른 영재 판별의 차이. 영재교육연구, 21(2), 427-447.

류지영, 정현철 (2010). 영재학급 대상자 선발을 관찰.추천 용 영재판별 모형 개발 연구. 영재교육연구, 20(1), 257-287.

방미선 (2013). 과학 영재 관찰.추천 선발 방식에 대한 교사의 인식 조사 및 개선 방안 연구. 석사학위논문. 부산대학교.

신동준, 이춘식 (2013). 발명영재의 관찰추천제 선발에 관한 초등 교사의 인식. 한국실과교육학회지, 26(1), 141-156.

오윤석, 한기순 (2011). 영재교육 대상자 선발을 위한 관찰.추천제의 가능성과 한계 분석. 한국교육, 38(4), 163-187.

윤초희, 박희찬 (2013). 관찰추천 과정에서 초등학교 교사가 인식하는 영재학생 판별기준과 추천 요인 분석. 영재교육연구, 23(5), 771-791.

이인호, 한기순 (2009). 영재교육 대상자 선발에서 교사 추천의 효용성 분석. 영재교육연구, 19(2), 381-404.

이동혁 (2010). 한국어판 Gifted Rating Scale의 구인타당도. 영재교육연구, 20(2) 595-619.

진현정, 최호성 (2010). 한국어판 영재아 행동특성 평정척도(K-SRBCSS)의 개발과 타당화. 영재교육연구, 20(2), 621-647.

한기순, 이정용 (2011). 영재교사들이 지각하는 관찰.추천 영재판별 시스템의 방향, 중요도, 실행수준 분석: 개념도 연구법을 활용하여. 영재교육연구, 21(1), 50-65.

황두영 (2014). 교사 관찰추천제의 영재행동 특성 평정척도의 평정결과 분석. 석사학위논문. 경남대학교.

Baum, S. (1994). Meeting the need of gifted/ learning disabled students. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 3(5), 6-16.

Strip, C., & Hirsch, G. (2009). 영재교육 노하우[이신동 역]. 서울: 시그마프레스.

Copenhaver, R. W., & Mcintyre, D. J. (1992). Teachers' perceptions of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14(3), 151-153. crossref(new window)

Davis, G. A. (1976). GIFT an instrument for the identification of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 178-182. crossref(new window)

Fox, L. H. (1981). Identification of the academically gifted. American Psychologist, 36(10), 1103-1111. crossref(new window)

Friedman, R. G., & Rogers, K. B. (1998). Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives on giftedness. NY: APA.

Gagne, F. (1994). Are teachers really poor detectors? Comments on Pegnato and Birch's (1959) study of the effectiveness and efficiency of various identification techniques. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 124-126.

Gear, G. (1976). Accuracy of teacher judgment in identifying intellectually gifted children: A review of the literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20(4), 478-490. crossref(new window)

Hany, E. A. (1995). Teachers' cognitive processes of identifying gifted students. In M. K. Katzko & F. J. Monks (Eds.), Nurturing talent: Individual needs and social ability (pp.184-198). Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

Hunsaker, S. L. (1994). Creativity as a characteristic of giftedness: Teachers see it, then don't. Roeper Review, 17(1), 11-15. crossref(new window)

Johnsen, S. K. (2008). Identifying gifted and talented learners. In F. A. Karnes & K. R. Stephens(Eds), Achieving excellence: Educating the gifted and talented (pp. 135-153). NY: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Plucker, J., & Callahan, C. (2009). 영재교육의 주요 이슈와 실제[송인섭, 이신동, 이경화 역]. 서울: 시그마프레스.

Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1993), Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. NY: University Press of America.

Maker, C. J., Nielson, A., & Rogers. J. (1994). Giftedness, diversity, and problem solving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27, 4-19. crossref(new window)

Never, J. (2004). Teacher identification of students for gifted programs: Nominations to a summer school for highly-gifted students. Psychology Science, 46, 348-362.

Pegnato, C. W., & Birch, J. W. (1959). Locating gifted children in junior high schools: A comparison of methods. Teaching Exceptional Children, 25, 300-304. crossref(new window)

Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1986). The enrichment triad/revolving door model: A school wide plan for the development of creative productivity. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed). System And Models For Developing Programs For The Gifted And Talented (pp. 216-266). TX: Creative Learning Press.

Sarouphim, K. M. (1999). DISCOVER: A promising alternative assessment for the identification of gifted minorities, Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 244-251. crossref(new window)

Single, D., & Powell, T. (2004). Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 21-29. crossref(new window)

Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted Children: Psychological and educational perspectives. NY: Macmillan.

Tuttle, F. B., & Becker, L. A. (1975). Characteristics and identification of G/T students. Washington, D.C.: NEA.