JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Determining the Rotation Periods of an Inactive LEO Satellite and the First Korean Space Debris on GEO, KOREASAT 1
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Determining the Rotation Periods of an Inactive LEO Satellite and the First Korean Space Debris on GEO, KOREASAT 1
Choi, Jin; Jo, Jung Hyun; Kim, Myung-Jin; Roh, Dong-Goo; Park, Sun-Youp; Lee, Hee-Jae; Park, Maru; Choi, Young-Jun; Yim, Hong-Suh; Bae, Young-Ho; Park, Young-Sik; Cho, Sungki; Moon, Hong-Kyu; Choi, Eun-Jung; Jang, Hyun-Jung; Park, Jang-Hyun;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Inactive space objects are usually rotating and tumbling as a result of internal or external forces. KOREASAT 1 has been inactive since 2005, and its drift trajectory has been monitored with the optical wide-field patrol network (OWL-Net). However, a quantitative analysis of KOREASAT 1 in regard to the attitude evolution has never been performed. Here, two optical tracking systems were used to acquire raw measurements to analyze the rotation period of two inactive satellites. During the optical campaign in 2013, KOREASAT 1 was observed by a 0.6 m class optical telescope operated by the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute (KASI). The rotation period of KOREASAT 1 was analyzed with the light curves from the photometry results. The rotation periods of the low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite ASTRO-H after break-up were detected by OWL-Net on April 7, 2016. We analyzed the magnitude variation of each satellite by differential photometry and made comparisons with the star catalog. The illumination effect caused by the phase angle between the Sun and the target satellite was corrected with the system tool kit (STK) and two line element (TLE) technique. Finally, we determined the rotation period of two inactive satellites on LEO and geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) with light curves from the photometry. The main rotation periods were determined to be 5.2 sec for ASTRO-H and 74 sec for KOREASAT 1.
 Keywords
KOREASAT 1;ASTRO-H;rotation period;differential photometry;light curve;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Albuja AA, Scheeres DJ, McMahon JW, Evolution of angular velocity for defunct satellites as a result of YORP: an initial study, Adv. Space Res. 56, 237-251 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.04.013 crossref(new window)

2.
Bertin E, Arnouts S, SExtractor: software for source extraction, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 117, 393-404 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/aas:1996164 crossref(new window)

3.
Binz CR, Davis MA, Kelm BE, Moore CI, Optical survey of the tumble rates of retired GEO satellites, in 2014 AMOS Conference, Maui, HI, 9-12 Sep 2014.

4.
CelesTrak, SATCAT Boxscore [Internet], cited 2016 May 27, available from: http://www.celestrak.com/satcat/boxscore.asp

5.
Choi J, Jo JH, Yim HS, Choi YJ, Park M, et al., Optical monitoring strategy for avoiding collisions of GEO satellites with close approaching IGSO objects, J. Astron. Space Sci. 32, 411-417 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2015.32.4.411 crossref(new window)

6.
Cognion RL, Rotation rates of inactive satellites near geosynchronous earth orbit, in 2014 AMOS Conference, Maui, HI, 9-12 Sep 2014.

7.
De Pontieu B, Database of photometric periods of artificial satellites, Adv. Space Res. 19, 229-232 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00005-7 crossref(new window)

8.
Hall D, Kervin P, Optical Characterization of Deep-Space Object Rotation States, in 2014 AMOS Conference, Maui, HI, 9-12 Sep 2014.

9.
IADC, Support to the IADC space debris mitigation guidelines, IADC-04-06 (2014).

10.
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Operation plan of X-ray astronomy satellite ASTRO-H (Hitomi) [Internet], cited 2016 Apr 28, available from: http://global.jaxa.jp/press/2016/04/20160428_hitomi.html

11.
Kessler DJ, Johnson NL, Liou LC, Matney M, The Kessler syndrome: implications to future space operations, in 33rd Annual AAS Guidance and Control Conference, Breckenridge, CO, 6-10 Feb 2010.

12.
Kim MJ, Rotational and observational properties of NEA and asteroid family: a case study on the NEA 1999 JU3 and Maria asteroid family, PhD Dissertation, Yonsei University (2014).

13.
Lenz P, Breger M, Period04 user guide, Comm. Asteroseismol. 146, 53-136 (2005).

14.
Papushev P, Karavaev Yu, Mishina M, Investigations of the evolution of optical characteristics and dynamics of proper rotation of uncontrolled geostationary artificial satellites, Adv. Space Res. 43, 1416-1422 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.02.007 crossref(new window)

15.
Park SY, Keum KH, Lee SW, Jin H, Park YS, et al., Development of a data reduction algorithm for Optical Wide Field Patrol, J. Astron. Space Sci. 30, 193-206 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2013.30.3.193 crossref(new window)

16.
Roh DG, Choi J, Jo JH, Yim HS, Park SY, et al., Magnitude standardization procedure for OWL-Net optical observations of LEO satellites, J. Astron. Space Sci. 32, 349-355 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2015.32.4.349 crossref(new window)

17.
Schildknecht T, Optical surveys for space debris, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 14, 41-111 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00159-006-0003-9 crossref(new window)

18.
Takahashi T, The ASTRO-H mission, Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital. 84, 776-781 (2013).

19.
Yanagisawa T, Kurosaki H, Shape and motion estimate of LEO debris using light curves, Adv. Space Res. 50, 136-145 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.03.021 crossref(new window)