JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Comparison of AMO System between Korea and US
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Comparison of AMO System between Korea and US
Joe, Hyunmyung;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
For the continued airworthiness of aviation products, aviation authority requires that every manufacturer should provide ICA(Instruction of Continued Airworthiness) to their users, and the users should follow it by themselves or using another approved maintenance agent. To reduce the cost and improve performance quality of maintenance activities, lots of users tries to outsource this job. To perform maintenance or repair of other owned air products, an air carrier and aviation maintenance companies should obtain AMO(approval of maintenance organization). It means AMO is a postulation to enter MRO(Maintenance Repair and Overhaul) market. For that, this paper discusses the comparison of requirements and procedures of AMO system between Korea and US to help understand the AMO system, and then, tries to point out what improvement should be made to Korean AMO system to be more effective, efficient and safe.
 Keywords
Approval of Maintenance Organization(AMO);Maintenance Repair and Overhaul(MRO);Repair Station;Risk Management;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
오경원, 최현식, 공창덕, 박현범, "항공 MRO 산업 사례를 통한 해군 무기체계 정비방안 고찰". 항공우주시스템공학회지, Vol.8, No.2, pp. 13-20, June 2014

2.
윤용현, "항공 MRO 산업의 새로운 패러다임". 항공산업연구, Vol. 75, pp. 1-24, June 2012

3.
국토교통부, 고시 제2014-845호, "고정익항공기를 위한 운항기술기준", www.mlit.go.kr, 2014

4.
국토교통부, 훈령 제33호, "정비조직인증 심사지침", www.mlit.go.kr, 2015

5.
국토교통부 항공안전관리시스템, http://atis.casa.go.kr/ATIS/

6.
FAA, Memorandum "FAA Continues to face challenge in implementing a risk-based approach for repair station oversight Report No. AV-2013-073", pp.6-11 May, 2013

7.
FAA, 14 CFR Part 145 Repair Stations, www.ecfr.faa.gov

8.
FAA, Order 8900.1 Flight Standards Information Management System(FSIMS), http://fsims.faa.gov, 2007

9.
FAA, AC 145-5 Repair Station Internal Evaluation Program, http://rgl.faa.gov, 1995

10.
FAA, AC 145-9 Guide for Developing and Evaluating Repair Station and Quality Control Manuals, http://rgl.faa.gov, 2009

11.
FAA, AC 145-11A Repair Station Guidance for Compliance with the Safety Agreement between the United States and the European Union, http://rgl.faa.gov, 2012

12.
김준호, 황창전, "헬기 MRO 비즈니스의 잠재력", 항공우주시스템공학회지, Vol.8, No.3, pp. 33-40, September 2014