JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Phoneme distribution and syllable structure of entry words in the CMU English Pronouncing Dictionary
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Phonetics and Speech Sciences
  • Volume 8, Issue 2,  2016, pp.11-16
  • Publisher : The Korean Society of Speech Sciences
  • DOI : 10.13064/KSSS.2016.8.2.011
 Title & Authors
Phoneme distribution and syllable structure of entry words in the CMU English Pronouncing Dictionary
Yang, Byunggon;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study explores the phoneme distribution and syllable structure of entry words in the CMU English Pronouncing Dictionary to provide phoneticians and linguists with fundamental phonetic data on English word components. Entry words in the dictionary file were syllabified using an R script and examined to obtain the following results: First, English words preferred consonants to vowels in their word components. In addition, monophthongs occurred much more frequently than diphthongs. When all consonants were categorized by manner and place, the distribution indicated the frequency order of stops, fricatives, and nasals according to manner and that of alveolars, bilabials and velars according to place. These results were comparable to the results obtained from the Buckeye Corpus (Yang, 2012). Second, from the analysis of syllable structure, two-syllable words were most favored, followed by three- and one-syllable words. Of the words in the dictionary, 92.7% consisted of one, two or three syllables. This result may be related to human memory or decoding time. Third, the English words tended to exhibit discord between onset and coda consonants and between adjacent vowels. Dissimilarity between the last onset and the first coda was found in 93.3% of the syllables, while 91.6% of the adjacent vowels were different. From the results above, the author concludes that an analysis of the phonetic symbols in a dictionary may lead to a deeper understanding of English word structures and components.
 Keywords
CMU English Pronouncing Dictionary;phoneme distribution;syllable structure;discord;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
음절구조로 본 서울코퍼스의 글 어절과 말 어절의 음소분포와 음운변동,양병곤;

말소리와 음성과학, 2016. vol.8. 3, pp.1-9 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Berg, T. (1994). The sensitivity of phonological rimes to phonetic length. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 19, 63-81.

2.
Borowsky, T. (1989). Structure preservation and the syllable coda in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7, 145-166. crossref(new window)

3.
Cable, S. (2013). Syllables and phonotactics. Retrieved from http://people.umass.edu/scable/LING201-SP13/Slides-Handouts/Syllables-Phonotactics.pdf on March 1, 2016.

4.
Crystal, T. H. & House, A. S. (1988). The duration of American-English stop consonants: An overview. Journal of Phonetics, 16, 285-294.

5.
Davis, S. (1985). Topics in syllable geometry. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.

6.
Duanmu, S. (2002). Two theories of onset clusters. Chinese Phonology, 11, 97-120.

7.
Flexner, B. (1987). The Random House dictionary of the English language (2nd edition). New York: Random House.

8.
Goldsmith, J. A. (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.

9.
Harley, H. (2006). English words: A linguistic introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

10.
Jackson, H. (1980). Analyzing English: An introduction to descriptive linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

11.
Kessler, B. & Treiman, R. (1997). Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 295-311. crossref(new window)

12.
McMahon, A. (2002). An introduction to English phonology. New York: Oxford University Press.

13.
Noyer, R. (2016). Transcription of English syllable structure. Retrieved from http://www.ling.upenn.edu/-rnoyer/courses/103/Transcription.pdf on March 1, 2016.

14.
R. Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/ [R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria] on March 1, 2016.

15.
Rubach, J. & Booij, G. (1990). Syllable structure assignment in Polish. Phonology, 7, 121-158. crossref(new window)

16.
Williamson, G. (2014). Syllables and clusters. Retrieved from http://www.sltinfo.com/syllables-and-clusters/ on March 1, 2016.

17.
Yang, Byunggon. (2012). Reduction and frequency analyses of vowels and consonants in the Buckeye Speech Corpus. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 4(3), 75-83.