Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Comparison of Biomechanical Characteristics of Rowing Performance between Elite and Non-Elite Scull Rowers: A Pilot Study
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Comparison of Biomechanical Characteristics of Rowing Performance between Elite and Non-Elite Scull Rowers: A Pilot Study
Kim, Jin-Sun; Cho, Hanyeop; Han, Bo-Ram; Yoon, So-Ya; Park, Seonhyung; Cho, Hyunseung; Lee, Joohyeon; Lee, Hae-Dong;
  PDF(new window)
Objective: This study aimed to examine the characteristics of joint kinematics and synchronicity of rowing motion between elite and non-elite rowers. Methods: Two elite and two non-elite rowers performed rowing strokes (3 trials, 20 strokes in each trial) at three different stroke rates (20, 30, 40 stroke/min) on two stationary rowing ergometers. The rowing motions of the rowers were captured using a 3-dimensional motion analysis system (8-infrared camera VICON system, Oxford, UK). The range of motion (RoM) of the knee, hip, and elbow joints on the sagittal plane, the lead time () and the drive time ) for each joint, and the elapsed time for the knee joint to maintain a fully extended position () during the stroke were analyzed and compared between elite and non-elite rowers. Synchronicity of the rowing motion within and between groups was examined using coefficients of variation (CV) of the for each joint. Results: Regardless of the stroke rate, the RoM of all joints were greater for the elite than for non-elite rowers, except for the RoMs of the knee joint at 30 stroke/min and the elbow joint at 40 stroke/min (p < .05). Although the at all stroke rates were the same between the groups, the for each joint was shorter for the elite than for the non-elite rowers. During the drive phase, elite rowers kept the fully extended knee joint angle longer than the non-elite rowers (p < .05). The CV values of the TDrive within each group were smaller for the elite compared with non-elite rowers, except for the CV values of the hip at all stroke/min and elbow at 40 stroke/min. Conclusion: The elite, compared with non-elite, rowers seem to be able to perform more powerful and efficient rowing strokes with large RoM and a short with the same .
Human;Rowing;Kinematics;Synchronicity;Rowing ergometer;
 Cited by
Relationship between Aiming Patterns and Scores in Archery Shooting, Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 2016, 26, 4, 353  crossref(new windwow)
Asami, T., Adachi, N. & Yamamoto, K. (1981). Biomechanical analysis of rowing performances. Biomechanics VII-B, 442-446.

Barrett, R. & Manning, J. (2004). Rowing: Relationships between rigging set-up, Anthropometry, physical capacity, Rowing kinematics and Rowing performance. Sports Biomechanics, 3(2), 221-235. crossref(new window)

Baudouin, A. & Hawkins, D. (2002). A biomechanical review of factors affecting rowing performance. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 36(6), 396-402. crossref(new window)

Buckeridge, E., Bull, A. & McGregor, A. (2015). Biomechanical determinants of elite rowing technique and performance. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 25(2), e176-e183. crossref(new window)

Chiu, L. Z. & Salem, G. J. (2006). Comparison of joint kinetics during free weight and flywheel resistance exercise. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 20(3), 555-562.

Flanagan, S., Salem, G. J., Wang, M.-Y., Sanker, S. E. & Greendale, G. A. (2003). Squatting exercises in older adults: kinematic and kinetic comparisons. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 35(4), 635. crossref(new window)

Holt, P., Bull, A., Cashman, P. & McGregor, A. (2003). Kinematics of spinal motion during prolonged rowing. International journal of sports medicine, 24(8), 597-602. crossref(new window)

Kim, Y. U. & Kim, Y. J. (2009). Biomechanical Comparison of Good and Bad Performances within Individual in Maximum Vertical Jump. Korean Journal of Sports Biomechanics, 19(3), 489-497. crossref(new window)

Kim, Y. U. & Eun, S. D. (2009). The Effects of Restricted Trunk Motion on the Performance of Maximum Vertical Jump. Korean Journal of Sports Biomechanics, 19(1), 27-36. crossref(new window)

Lamb, D. H. (1989). A kinematic comparison of ergometer and on-water rowing. The American journal of sports medicine, 17(3), 367-373. crossref(new window)

Lee, H. D., Han, B. R., Kim, J. S., Oh, J. H., Cho, H. Y. & Yoon, S. Y. (2015). Differences in the length change pattern of the medial gastrocnemius muscle-tendon complex and fascicle during gait and one-legged and twolegged vertical jumping. Korean Journal of Sports Biomechanics, 25(2), 175-182. crossref(new window)

MacFarlane, D., Edmond, I. & Walmsley, A. (1997). Instrumentation of an ergometer to monitor the reliability of rowing performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 15(2), 167-173. crossref(new window)

Martin, T. P. & Bernfield, J. S. (1979). Effect of stroke rate on velocity of a rowing shell. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 12(4), 250-256.

Nelson, W. N. & Widule, C. J. (1982). Kinematic analysis and efficiency estimate of intercollegiate female rowers. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 15(6), 535-541.

Roy, S. H., De Luca, C. J., Snyder-Mackler, L., Emley, M. S., Crenshaw, R. L. & Lyons, J. P. (1990). Fatigue, recovery, and low back pain in varsity rowers. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 22(4), 463-469.

Schneider, E. & Hauser, M. (1981). Biomechanical analysis of performance in rowing. Biomechanics VII-B, 430-435.

Smith, R. M. & Loschner, C. (2002). Biomechanics feedback for rowing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20(10), 783-791. crossref(new window)

Smith, R. M. & Spinks, W. L. (1995). Discriminant analysis of biomechanical differences between novice, good and elite rowers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 13(5), 377-385. crossref(new window)