JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Formalizing the Role of Social Capital on Individuals` Continuous Use of Social Networking Sites from a Social Cognitive Perspective
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Formalizing the Role of Social Capital on Individuals` Continuous Use of Social Networking Sites from a Social Cognitive Perspective
Guo, Yu; Li, Yiwei; Ito, Naoya;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
By integrating useful insights from social cognitive theory and social capital theory, we aim to develop a model for better understanding people`s behaviors related to the use of social networking sites (SNSs) and formalize the role of social capital in individuals` continuous SNS use. Propositions that emphasize the triadic interactive relationships among environmental, personal, and behavioral factors were highlighted in this study. After reviewing previous studies, in this paper we proposed the following: (1) the causation between SNS use and individuals` perceived social capital might be mutual; social capital may not only be the result of media selectivity, but could also be an essential stimulus initiating the start of using SNSs; (2) the influences of SNSs use on the generation of individuals` online social capital might be conditional upon particular patterns of use; (3) both the level of dependence on SNSs and the differentiated patterns of SNSs use vary according to individuals` perceived offline social capital and their personal characteristics, for instance, personality or self-construal, and social anxiety.
 Keywords
Computer-mediated communication;social capital;social cognitive theory;social networking sites (SNSs);media usage;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1289-1295. crossref(new window)

2.
Antoci, A., Sabatini, F., & Sodini, M. (2011). See you on Facebook! A framework for analyzing the role of computer-mediated interaction in the evolution of social capital. Department of Communication, University of Teramo.

3.
AP. (2012). Number of active users at Facebook over the years. Retrieved September, 20, 2013, from http://news.yahoo.com/number-active-users-facebook-over-230449748.html

4.
Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant, & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 121-153). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

5.
Boulianne, S.. (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193-211. crossref(new window)

6.
Bryant, J., Thompson, S., & Finklea, B. W. (2002). Fundamentals of media effects: McGraw-Hill Nueva York, NY: Waveland Press.

7.
Cemalcilar, Z., Falbo, T., & Stapleton, L. M. (2005). Cyber communication: A new opportunity for international students' adaptation? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(1), 91-110. crossref(new window)

8.
Chang, H. H., & Chuang, S.-S. (2011). Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator. Information & Management, 48(1), 9-18. crossref(new window)

9.
Chang, Y. P., & Zhu, D. H.. (2012). The role of perceived social capital and flow experience in building users' continuance intention to social networking sites in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 995-1001. crossref(new window)

10.
Chiu, C.M., Hsu, M.H., & Wang, E.T.G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872-1888. crossref(new window)

11.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, S95-S120.

12.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends:"Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. crossref(new window)

13.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873-892. crossref(new window)

14.
Gross, E. F., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 75-90. crossref(new window)

15.
Guo, Y., Li, Y., & Ito, N.. (2013). Exploring the predicted effect of social networking site use on perceived social capital and psychological well-being of Chinese international students in Japan. Cyber Psychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(1), 52-58.

16.
Harris, R. J. (2009). A cognitive psychology of mass communication. (5th ed). NY: Taylor & Francis.

17.
Kim, Y., Hsu, S.-H., & Gil de Zuniga, H. (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 498-516. crossref(new window)

18.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017. crossref(new window)

19.
Lang, A. (2013). Discipline in Crisis? The Shifting Paradigm of Mass Communication Research. Communication Theory, 23(1), 10-24. crossref(new window)

20.
LaRose, R., & Eastin, M.S. (2004). A social cognitive theory of Internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(3), 358-377. crossref(new window)

21.
Moore, K., & McElroy, J. C. (2012). The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 267-274. crossref(new window)

22.
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations: Simon and Schuster.

23.
Ross, C., Orr, E. S, Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 578-586. crossref(new window)

24.
Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., & Kwak, N.. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531-565. crossref(new window)

25.
Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., Holbert, R. (2001). "Connecting" and "disconnecting" with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political communication, 18(2), 141-162. crossref(new window)

26.
Shaw, L. H., & Gant, L. M. (2002). In defense of the Internet: The relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 157-171. crossref(new window)

27.
Stepanikova, I., Nie, N. H., & He, X.. (2010). Time on the Internet at home, loneliness, and life satisfaction: Evidence from panel time-diary data. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 329-338. crossref(new window)

28.
Sum, S., Mathews, M., Pourghasem, M., & Hughes, I. (2008). Internet technology and social capital: How the Internet affects seniors'social capital and wellbeing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 202-220. crossref(new window)

29.
Weiser, E. B. (2001). The functions of Internet use and their social and psychological consequences. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(6), 723-743. crossref(new window)

30.
Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436-455. crossref(new window)

31.
Williams, D. (2007). The impact of time online: Social capital and cyberbalkanization. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 398-406. crossref(new window)