JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Trend and Implication of OECD Hospital Performance Project
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Quality Improvement in Health Care
  • Volume 22, Issue 1,  2016, pp.11-26
  • Publisher : The Korean Society of Quality Assurance in Health Care
  • DOI : 10.14371/QIH.2016.22.1.11
 Title & Authors
Trend and Implication of OECD Hospital Performance Project
Park, Choon-Seon; Choi, HyoJung; Hwang, Soo-Hee; Im, JeeHye; Kim, Kyoung-Hoon; Kim, Sun-Min;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which has continuously evaluated the performance of healthcare systems, has recently invested much effort into hospital performance measurement. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the hospital performance measurement programs operated by international organizations or at the national level based on the OECD`s hospital performance project. Health Insurance Review & Assessment service (HIRA)`s quality assessment was analyzed based on the analytical framework of the OECD`s hospital performance project. The hospital performance measurement programs of WHO, Canada, Australia, United States and United Kingdom are briefly explored, in view of the conceptual framework, key performance dimensions and indicators that are currently in use. The OECD suggested seven key dimensions of hospital performance: timeliness, efficiency, continuity, effectiveness and appropriateness, staff orientation, patient orientation and safety. The analysis of the quality assessment program of HIRA, which operates 36 diseases and procedures and 347 indicators, shows that the numbers of indicators are relatively small in the areas of safety, patient centeredness and efficiency. Continuity of care and staff orientation are not fully developed also, but the situations are similar in other countries. In conclusion, hospital performance measurement using stable and comprehensive data should be developed to improve overall system performance, and discussions on a conceptual framework that can lay out directions and key performance domains need to take into place.
 Keywords
Hospital performance measurement;Quality of care;Quality assessment;Conceptual framework;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Park CS, Choi BR, Kim KH, Yoon YN, Chung GW, Kim SM. OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project. J Quality Improvement in Health Care 2011;17(1):49-58.

2.
Arah OA, Westert GP, Hurst J, Klazinga NS. A Conceptual Framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project. Int J for Quality in Health Care 2006;18(Suppl.1):5-13. crossref(new window)

3.
Brownwood I. Hospital performance-stage 1 report(DELSA/HEA/HCQ(2015)1). Paris:OECD, 2015.

4.
European Collaboration for Healthcare Optimization[Internet]. EU. [cited 2016 Apr] Available from: http://echo-health.eu

5.
Peiro S, Maynard A. Variations in Health Care Delivery within the European Union. Eu J of Public Health 2015;25(Suppl.1):1-2.

6.
Heijink R, Engelfriet P, Rehnberg C, Kittelsen SAC, Hakkinen U. A window on geographic variation in health care:Insights from EuroHOPE. Health Economics 2015;24(Suppl.2):164-77. crossref(new window)

7.
Brownwood I. Hospital performance-progress report(DELSA/HEA/HCQ(2015)4). Paris:OECD, 2015.

8.
Ministry of Health and Welfare. 선택진료, 상급병실 비용 부담을 대폭 감소시키고, 환자 안전, 의료 질 향상에 대한 건강보험 지원 강화. [Internet]. Korea. MOHW. 2015 [cited 2016 Apr 28]. Available from: http://www.mohw.go.kr/front_new/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=0403&page=54&CONT_SEQ=324728

9.
HIRA. Experiences of Hospital Performance Measurement of OECD member countries. HIRA international symposium. Seoul:HIRA, 2015 Sep 17.

10.
WHO. Performance assessment tool for quality improvement in health care. Copenhagen:WHO, 2007.

11.
Veillard J, Champagne F, Klazinga N, Kazandjian V, Arah OA, Guisset AL. A Performance Assessment Framework for Hospitals:The WHO Regional Office for Europe PATH Project. Int J for Quality in Health Care 2005;17(6):487-96. crossref(new window)

12.
Groene O, Skau JKH, Frolich A. An International Review of Projects on Hospital Performance Assessment. Int J Quality in Health Care 2008;20(3):162-71. crossref(new window)

13.
CIHI. A performance measurement framework for Canadian hospitals. Ottawa:CIHI, 2013.

14.
National Health Performance Authority. Performance and Accountability Framework. National Health Reform Act 2011[Internet]. Australia. [cited 2016 Apr 15]. Available from: http://nhpa.gov.au/internet/nhpa/publishing.nsf/Content/National-Health-Reform-Act-2011

15.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. About Hospital Compare data[Internet]. U.S. [cited 2016 Apr 15]. Available from: http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/Data/About.html

16.
CMS. How measures are selected[Internet]. U.S. [cited 2016 Apr 15]. Available from: http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/Data/Measures-selected.html

17.
CMS. About Hospital Compare[Internet]. U.S. [cited 2016 Apr 15]. Available from: http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/Data/Data-sources.html

18.
CMS. Quality Initiatives/Patient Assessment Instruments[Internet]. U.S. [cited 2016 Apr 15]. Available from: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInitiative/HospitalCompare

19.
Department of Health and Human Services. Federal Register:Vol.78, No.160. 2013.

20.
CMS. Quality Initiatives/Patient Assessment Instruments[Internet]. U.S. [cited 2016 Apr 15]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/QualityInitiativesGeninfo/CMS-Quality-Strategy.html

21.
Institute of Medicine(U.S.). Crossing the quality chasm - a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC; National Academy Press, 2001.

22.
HIRA. [Internet]. Korea. [cited 2016 Apr 28] Available from: http://www.hira.or.kr/dummy.do?pgmid=HIRAA020002000000&cmsurl=/cms/inform/01/1344758_27106.html&subject=2016년도요양급여적정성평가계획

23.
HIRA. Comprehensive quality report of National Health Insurance 2010-2014. Seoul:HIRA, 2010-4.