JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Smartphone Usage Experience of College students
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Smartphone Usage Experience of College students
Kim, Jungae; Cho, Eui-young;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the smart phone usage experience structure for college students. The phenomenology approach was used by conducting 4 times in-depth interviews with the 7 college students age between 20~23. Collected Data was analyzed by Giorgi`s phenomenological method. There were 4 general structure descriptions and 28 themes. General structure descriptions were `Dependence on smart phone`, `Phenomenon of smart phone usage`, `Results of smart phone usage` and `Relationship between stress and smart phone`. Themes consisted of `Ambivalence`, `Positive feelings for smart phones`, `Separation anxiety`, `Negative feelings for smart phones`. `Dependent feelings for smart phones`, `A sense of unity with smart phones`, `Helpful for my life`, `Deeply involved with my life`, `Useful tool in my life`, `Study, communication, relaxation and health care`, `Maintain personal relationship`, `The most important thing in my life`, `Shallow relationship stress`, `Interference with personal relationship`, `Forming a negative relationship`, `Invasion of privacy`, `Forming a Incorrect relationship`, `Unwanted participation`, `No effort to improve relationship`, `Poor concentration`, `Interference with academic study`, `Study assistance`, `Limited help for study in depth`, `Shelter from the stress`, `Amplification of the stress`, `Obsessive focus`, `Feel separation for the reality` and `Waste of time`. Smart phone usage make college students dependent on smart phones and had negative influence on both personal relationship and academic results. Usage of smart phone also amplified stress. Therefore we need fundamental principles on usage of smart phone and propose to build cultural etiquette that provides reasonable way to use smartphone.
 Keywords
College students;Phenomenology;Usage of smartphone;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
1.
스마트폰과 음성합성을 활용한 영어 말하기 과제의 개발과 평가,문도식;

한국인터넷방송통신학회논문지, 2016. vol.16. 5, pp.13-20 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
H.Y, Kang, C.H, Park. Development and Validation of the Smartphone Addiction Inventory. Korean Journal of Psychology. Vol. 31(2). pp. 563-580. 2012.

2.
Year 2011 Smartphone's usage research. KISA. 2011.

3.
H.W, Kwak, J.U, Kwahk, S.J, Kim, J.M, Lee. Usability testing of the domestic web site design: questionnaire and heuristic evaluation. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science. Vol. 11(1), pp 33-45. 2000.

4.
Kormendi A. Smartphone usage among adolescents. Psychiatr Hung. Vol. 30(3). pp 297-302. 2015.

5.
Tahiroglou AY, Celik GG, Uzel M, Ozcan N, Avci A. Internet use among Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychol Behav. Vol 11, pp 537-43. 2008 crossref(new window)

6.
Leung L. Stressful life events, motives for internet use, and social support among digital kids. Cyberpsychol Behav. Vol 10, pp 204-14. 2007. crossref(new window)

7.
Kormas G, Critselis E, Janikian M, Kafetzis D, Tsitsika A. Risk factors and psychosocial characteristics of potential problematic and problematic internet use among adolescents: a cross sectional study. BMC public health. Vol 11, pp 595. 2011. crossref(new window)

8.
Mckenna KY, Bargh JA. The implication of the internet for personality and social psychology. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. Vol 4, pp 57-75. 2000. crossref(new window)

9.
E.J, Kim, K, Namkoong, T, Ku, S.J, Kim. The Relationship between online game addiction and aggression, self-control and narcissistic personality traits. Eur Psychiatry. Vol 23, pp 212-218. 2008. crossref(new window)

10.
Yen JY, Ko CH, Yen CF, Chen SH, Chung WL, Chen CC, et al. Psychiatric symptoms in adolescents with internet addiction: comparison with substance use. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. Vol 62, pp 9-16. 2008. crossref(new window)

11.
K.S, Young. Psychology of computer use XL. Addictive use of internet: A case that breaks the stereotype. Psychological Rep. Vol 79, pp 899-902. 1996. crossref(new window)

12.
J.Y, Lee. An exploration of socio-environmental and individual-psychological variable affecting the adolescents cellular phone addiction. unpublished master's thesis. Korea National University of education. 2006.

13.
Montag C, Blaszkiewicz K, Sariyska R, Lachmann B, Andone I, Trendafilov B, Eibes M, Markowetz A. Smartphone usage in the 21st century: who is active on Whats App? BMC Res Notes. Vol. 4(8). pp. 331. 2015. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1280-z. crossref(new window)

14.
H, Kang, W, Shin. Do Smartphone Power Users Protect Mobile Privacy Better than Nonpower Users? Exploring Power Usage as a Factor in Mobile Privacy Protection and Disclosure. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. Vol. 19(3). pp. 179-85. 2016. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0340. crossref(new window)

15.
Attri JP, Khetarpal R, Chatrath V, Kaur J. Concerns about usage of smartphones in operating room and critical care scenario. Saudi J Anaesth. Vol. 10(1). pp. 87-94. 2016. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.169483. crossref(new window)

16.
Yaman H, Yavuz E, Er A, Vural R, Albayrak Y, Yardimci A, Asilkan O. The use of mobile smart devices and medical apps in the family practice setting. J Eval Clin Pract. Vol. 22(2). pp. 290-6. 2016. doi: 10.1111/jep.12476. crossref(new window)

17.
Y.N, H.N. The influence of healthy lifestyle behaviors in collegiate smartphone. Journal of the Korean Society of health information and health statistics. Vol. 36(2). pp 172-182. 2011.

18.
I.K, Kee, J.S, Byun, J.K, Jung, J.K, Choi. The presence of altered craniocervical posture and mobility in smartphone-addicted teenagers with temporomandibular disorders. J Phys Ther. Vol. 28(2). pp. 339-46. 2016. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.339. crossref(new window)

19.
Patton, M. Q. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 1990.

20.
Cherif L, Ayedi H, Hadjkacem I, Khemekhem K, Khemekhem S, Walha A, Kossentini I, Moalla Y, Ghribi F. Problematic Internet use among teenagers in Sfax, Tunisia. Encephale. Vol. 41(6). pp. 487-92. 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2015.04.001. crossref(new window)

21.
H.C, Han, J.H, Jeong, S.R, Kim, Y.G, Kim. Decision-making system for the resource forecasting and risk management using regression. JIBC. Vol. 15(6). pp. 311-319. 2015.

22.
Middelweerd A, van der Laan DM, van Stralen MM, Mollee JS, Stuij M, te Velde SJ, Brug J. What features do Dutch university students prefer in a smartphone application for promotion of physical activity? A qualitative approach. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. Vol. 1(12), pp. 31. 2015. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0189-1. crossref(new window)

23.
M.K, Yi, D.S, Yoo, T.K, Whangbo. A Security Labeling Scheme for Provacy Protection in Personal Health Record System. JIBC. Vol. 15(6). pp. 173-180. 2015.

24.
Goedhart G, Kromhout H, Wiart J, Vermeulen R. Validating self-reported mobile phone use in adults using a newly developed smartphone application. Occup Environ Med. Vol. 72(11). pp. 812-8. 2015. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-102808. crossref(new window)

25.
Montag C, Blaszkiewicz K, Sariyska R, Lachmann B, Andone I, Trendafilov B, Eibes M, Markowetz A. Smartphone usage in the 21st century: who is active on Whats App? BMC Res Notes. Vol. 4(8). pp. 331. 2015. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1280-z. crossref(new window)

26.
Demirci K, Akgonul M, Akpinar A. Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. J Behav Addict. Vol. 4(2). pp. 85-92. 2015. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.010. crossref(new window)

27.
Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., & Gray, K. Students and staff perceptions of information and communication technologies Computers & Education. Vol. 54(4). pp. 1202-1211. 2010. crossref(new window)