JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Efficacy of Mobile Device Distribution Improvement Act : Long-term Contract and Cap Regulation on Breach Fee
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Efficacy of Mobile Device Distribution Improvement Act : Long-term Contract and Cap Regulation on Breach Fee
Kim, Weonseek;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study analyzes how breach fee under long-term contract and/or cap regulation on the breach fee can affect the impacts of "Mobile Device Distribution Improvement Act" on handset bundle price, average revenue per unit (ARPU), and social welfare. We conduct comparative analysis with an economic model of duopoly competition in price when users are under long-term contract and the breach fee can be regulated. The results show that the Act lowers the equilibrium prices, lower than incumbent price without the Act. Price of non-dominant Mobile Network Operator (MNO) can be lower than poaching price without the Act if significant portion of switching cost is breach fee or the market is significantly asymmetric. Under the significant circumstances, the Act can raise ARPU even though it improves social welfare. By contrast, the Act increases consumer surplus without affecting social welfare if breach fee is the only source of user`s switching cost and is capped by the regulation, and more symmetric market and the stronger cap leads to higher consumer surplus.
 Keywords
Long-Term Contract;Breach Fee;Handset Bundle Price;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Aghion, P. and P. Bolton, "Contract as a Barrier to Entry", The American Economic Review, Vol.77, No.3, 1987, 388-401.

2.
Chen, Y., "Paying Customers to Switch", Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol.6, No.4, 1997, 877-897. crossref(new window)

3.
Cheong, I.S., "Handset Bundling and Subsidy : Competition Effect on Handset Market", International Telecommunications Policy Review, Vol.20, No.2, 2013, 79-104. (정인석, "단말기 번들링과 보조금 : 단말기 경쟁 효과", 정보통신정책연구, 제20권, 제2호, 2013, 79-104.)

4.
Choi, S.H. and D.H. Kim, "An Analysis of the Effects of Mobile Handset Subsidies on Consumer Welfare", The Korean Association for Information Society, Vol.21, 2011, 141-165. (최성호, 김동훈, "이동통신 단말기 보조금의 경쟁제한성 판단과 소비자 후생효과", 정보사회와 미디어, 제21권, 2011, 141-165.)

5.
Daoud, F. and H. Hammainen, "Market Analysis of Mobile Handsets Subsidies", TS 15th Biennial Conference, Berlín, 2004, 5-7.

6.
Digital Times, "The Size of Breach Fee Rises by 3.6 since the Mobile Device Distribution Improvement Act is in Force", 2015.

7.
Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole, "Customer Poaching and Brand Switching", RAND Journal of Economics, Vol.31, No.4, 1999, 634-657.

8.
http://www.dt.co.kr/contents.html?article_no=2015101202109931104006, 2015.

9.
Kang, S.W., "Welfare Effect of Behavior-based Handset Subsidy Discrimination", International Telecommunications Policy Review, Vol.21, No.2, 2014, 57-85. (강사웅, "가입유형에 따른 단말기 보조금 차별의 후생 효과", 정보통신정책연구, 제21권, 제2호, 2014, 57-85.)

10.
Kim, M.J., A Study on the Economic Effects of Mobile Handset Subsidy, KDI Research Monograph, 2014. (김민정, 이동통신 단말기 보조금의 경제적 효과에 관한 연구, 한국개발연구원, 2014.)

11.
Kim, W.S., "Consumer Behavior of Handset Replacement and Efficacy of 'Mobile Device Distribution Improvement Act' : Replacement Cycle and Quality Choice", Telecommunications Review, Vol.25, No.26, 2015a, 951-961. (김원식, "단말기 교체행태와 단통법의 효력 : 교체 주기와 품질선택", 텔레커뮤니케이션즈 리뷰, 제25권, 제26호, 2015, 951-961.)

12.
Kim, W.S., "Effects on Manufacturer's Supply Strategies of Subsidy Ceiling Regulation and Equivalent Discount Calling Plan", Telecommunications Review, Vol.25, No.5, 2015b, 745-755. (김원식, "보조금 상한규제와 선택할인요금제가 단말기 제조사의 공급전략에 미치는 효과", 텔레커뮤니케이션즈 리뷰, 제25권, 제5호, 2015, 745-755.)

13.
Kim, Y.Y. and I.H. Kang, "A Social Welfare Analysis of Mobile Handset Subsidy", International Telecommunications Policy Review, Vol.19, No.2, 2012, 93-111. (김용규, 강임호, "단말기 보조금의 사회후생효과 분석", 정보통신정책학회, 제19권, 제2호, 2012, 93-111.)

14.
Kwon, N.H., "The Competition Effects of Mobile Retail Regulations in Korea", Korea Academic Society of Industrial Organization, Vol.23, No.2, 2015, 1-31. (권남훈, "단말기 및 이동통신 서비스 유통규제의 시장 경쟁 효과", 산업조직연구, 제23권, 제2호, 2015, 1-31.)

15.
Lee, J.Y., D.H. Lee, and D.H. Lee, "Network Externalities in Mobile Telephony and Handset Subsidy Regulation", International Telecommunications Policy Review, Vol.18, No.4, 2011, 61-108. (이종용, 이동희, 이덕희, "이동전화 네트워크 외부성과 단말기 보조금 규제", 정보통신정책연구, 제18권, 제4호, 2011, 61-108.)

16.
Okholm, H.B., S. Karlsen, T.T. Pedersen, and J. Tops, "How does Handset Subsidies affect Incentives to Innovate?", Copenhagen Economics, 2008.

17.
Park, J.W. and I.T. Ahn, "Economic Effects of Handset Subsidy", The Korean Academic Society of Industrial Organization, Vol.12, No.3, 2004, 1-45. (박진우, 안일태, "단말기 보조금의 경제적 효과 분석 : 정태모형을 중심으로", 한국산업조직연구, 제12권, 제3호, 2004, 1-45.)

18.
Rhee, K., "Handset Subsidy Regulation, Replacement of Handsets, and Quality Investments", The Korean Economic Review, Vol.30, No.1, 2014, 85-107.

19.
Thomas, G. and R. Stenbacka, "Two at the Top : Quality Differentiation in Markets with Switching Costs", mimeo, 2005.