Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Study on the System Readiness Assessment Procedure Development through a case study in Defense R&D Programs
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Study on the System Readiness Assessment Procedure Development through a case study in Defense R&D Programs
Woo, Soon; Lee, Jong Ho; Lim, Jae Sung;
  PDF(new window)
Purpose: Simple part or equipment is necessary TRA(Technology Readiness Assessment) or MRA(Manufacturing Readiness Assessment). But sole maturity like TRA, MRA has limit complex systems or SoS(System of System). Especially complex weapon system need from the System Maturity Point of view. This research shows necessity of SRA(System Readiness Assessment). Methods: In case of complex systems, it is essential to SRA(System Readiness Assessment). For the purpose of calculating SRL(System Readiness Level), TRL and IRL must be calculated. And then SRL can obtain know from equation of TRL and IRL. To prove SRA effectiveness, it is calculated SRL of JTDLS(Joint Tactical DataLink System) programs. Results: SRA procedure is proposed and case study shows as examples of JTDLS programs. Although result of TRA is TRL6, result of SRA is not 0.6. From this research, we can know necessity of SRA. Especially complex systems or SoS(System of System) is essential to SRA. Conclusion: SRA(System Readiness Assessment) is required to overcome limitation of sole maturity and to achieve a successful acquisition of high quality weapon system. This research intended to suggest SRA procedure and case study in complex defense system.
 Cited by
QFD 및 Stage-gate 모델을 활용한 국방분야 개발단계 품질관리 방안 연구,장봉기;

품질경영학회지, 2014. vol.42. 3, pp.279-290 crossref(new window)
A Study on the development quality control by application of QFD and Stage-gate in defense system, Journal of the Korean society for quality management, 2014, 42, 3, 279  crossref(new windwow)
Azizian, N., Sarkani, S., and Mazzuchi, T. 2009. "A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Maturity Assessment Approaches for Improved Decision support to Achieve Efficient Defense Acquisition." Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science.

DAPA. 2013. Defense Program Management Regulation.

DAPA. 2013. Manufacturing Readiness Assessment Instruction.

DAPA. 2013. Technology Readiness Assessment Instruction.

DoD. 2012. Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook.

GAO. 2005-2012. "Assessments of Select ed Weapon Programs." Report to Congressional Committees.

GAO. 2010. "DoD Can Achieve Better Outcomes by Standardizing the Way Manufacturing Risks Are Managed." Report to Congressional Requesters.

Kim, H. W., Woo, S., and Jang, B. K. 2013. "A Study on Readiness Assessment for the Acquisition of high quality weapon system." Korean Society for Quality Management 41(3):395-404. crossref(new window)

Mosher, D. E. 2000. "Understanding the Extraordinary Cost Growth of Missile Defense." Arms Control Today.

Ree, Sangbok. 2009. "Method determining level of Noise Factor of Taguchi Method under various probability distribution." Korean Society for Quality Management 37(4):10-15.

Ree, Sangbok. 2013. "Study on the Result changes with the Size of the Variance in Taguchi Method and Factor Experimental." Korean Society for Quality Management 41(1):1-14. crossref(new window)

Sauser, B., and Forbes, E. 2009. "Defining an Integration Readiness Level for Defense Acquisition." International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering.

Sauser, B., Marquez, R., Magnaye, R., and Tan, W. 2008. "A Systems Approach to Expanding the Technology Readiness Level within Defense Acquisition." International Journal of Defense Acquisition Management 1:39-58.

Tetlay, A., and John, P. 2009. "Determining the Lines of System Maturity, System Readiness and Capability Readiness in the System Development Lifecycle." 7th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research.

Woo, S. 2013. "Introduction to MRA in defense acquisition program." Defense and Technology