JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Study on the Efficiency Analysis of R&D General Management Cost for Domestic R&D Agency Institutes
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Study on the Efficiency Analysis of R&D General Management Cost for Domestic R&D Agency Institutes
Song, Gwangsuk; Yoo, Hanjoo; Kim, Kyung-Won; Jang, Hyun-Duk;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Purpose: This study is aimed to develope effective guidelines of R&D institute with regard to general management cost, by analyzing the management characteristics of 14 domestic R&D institutes general management costs. Methods: The bootstrapping method is applied to obtain the average general management cost of 14 R&D institute and the effective R&D institutes are presented by comparing the general management costs of R&D and the rate of inflation. Results: The results show that the average R&D general management cost of 14 R&D institutes is 3.32% and, in general, it turns out that the R&D general management costs do not reflect the inflation rate after a comparative analysis of the variation of the R&D general management costs. In addition, the results of cost-effective analysis show that only 5 R&D institutes are efficient in R&D activities. Conclusion: Applying a uniform standard of R&D general management costs although their management characteristics are different, can cause the impediment to the independence and transparency of R&D institutes. Therefore it is recommended a strict implementation with respect to the monitoring system of each R&D institute and the budget policy methods which are reflected management characteristics.
 Keywords
R&D General Management Cost;R&D Efficiency;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Banker, D. R., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W. 1984. "Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis."Management Science 30(9):1078-1092. crossref(new window)

2.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. 1978. "Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Marking Units."European Journal of Operational Research 2(6):429-444. crossref(new window)

3.
Efron, B. 1981. "Nonparametric Estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods." Biometrika 68(3):589-599. crossref(new window)

4.
Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. J. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall.

5.
Kim, Young-Tae, Im, Kwang-Hyuk, Lee, Sang-Chul, and Park, Sang-Chan.2012."Development of an Evaluation Model for R&D Technology Portfolio Based on Business Model Components."Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 40(3):372-380. crossref(new window)

6.
KISTEP. 2013. Government Research and Development Budget Analysis in the FY 2013. KISTEP:1-212.

7.
Lee, Heoungkwan, Kim, Mingi, and Kim, Sungsoo. 2010. "Efficiency Analysis of R&D General Management Cost." R&D Budget& Policy 2010-4:1-32.

8.
Lee, Sejun. 2012. Analysis of Government R&D Programs' Planning. Evaluation, and Management Practices and Future Prospect. KISTEP.

9.
MIC. 1999. A Framework of R&D Budget System for Information and Telecommunications R&D Projects. MIC.

10.
Park, JongGeun, Sung, KiSoon, and HaeSook. Kim.2003."Development of R&D Standard Processes for E Research Institute." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 31(4):127-149.

11.
Um, Ikchun, and Ahn, Seounggu. 2009. Government Research and Development Budget Analysis in the FY 2009. KISTEP.

12.
Yim, Sung-Min, and Jung, Uk. 2014. "Regarding the Preliminary Feasibility Study of National R&D Program : With Focus on the Applicability of Theory of Attractive Quality." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 42(2):131-144. crossref(new window)