JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Diagnostic Performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA and HPV DNA Assays for the Detection and Screening of Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus Infection among Woman with Cervical Lesions in China
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Diagnostic Performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA and HPV DNA Assays for the Detection and Screening of Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus Infection among Woman with Cervical Lesions in China
Wang, Hye-young; Lee, Dongsup; Park, Sunyoung; Kim, Geehyuk; Kim, Sunghyun; Han, Lin; Yubo, Ren; Li, Yingxue; Park, Kwang Hwa; Lee, Hyeyoung;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection worldwide and it is responsible for most cases of cervical uterine cancer. Although HPV infections of the cervix do not always progress to cancer, 90% of cervical cancer cases have been found to be associated with high risk HPV (HR-HPV) infection. HPV DNA testing is widely used, along with Papanicolaou (Pap) testing, to screen for cervical abnormalities. However, there are no data on the prevalence of genotype-specific HPV infections assessed by measuring HPV E6/E7 mRNA in women representative of the Chinese population across a broad age range. Materials and Methods: In the present study, we compared the results with the CervicGen HPV RT-qDx assay, which detects 16 HR-HPV genotypes (Alpha-9: HPV 16, 31, 33, 35, 52, and 58; Alpha-7: HPV 18, 39, 45, 51, 59, and 68; and Alpha-5, 6: HPV 53, 56, 66, and 69), and the REBA HPV-ID assay, which detects 32 HPV genotypes based on the reverse blot hybridization assay (REBA) for the detection of oncogenic HPV infection according to cytological diagnosis. We also investigated the prevalence and genotype distribution of HPV infection with a total of 324 liquid-based cytology samples collected in western Shandong province, East China. Results: The overall HPV prevalences determined by HPV DNA and HPV E6/E7 mRNA assays in this study were 79.9% (259/324) and 55.6% (180/324), respectively. Although the positivity of HPV E6/E7 mRNA expression was significantly lower than HPV DNA positivity, the HPV E6/E7 mRNA assay showed greater specificity than the HPV DNA assay (88.6% vs. 48.1%) in normal cytology samples. The prevalence of Alpha-9 (HPV 16, 31, 33, 35, 52, and 58) HPV infection among these women accounted for up to 80.3% and 76.1% of the high-grade lesions detected in the HPV mRNA and DNA tests, respectively. The HR-HPV genotype distribution, based on HPV DNA and E6/E7 mRNA expression by age group in patients with cytologically confirmed lesions, was highest in women aged 40 to 49 years (35.9% for cytologically confirmed cases, Pearson correlation r value
 Keywords
Cervical cancer;HPV;E6/E7 mRNA;REBA;prevalence;molecular diagnosis;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Proteomic identification of potential biomarkers for cervical squamous cell carcinoma and human papillomavirus infection, Tumor Biology, 2017, 39, 4, 101042831769754  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Agarossi A, Ferrazzi E, Parazzini F, et al (2009). Prevalence and type distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in women undergoing voluntary cervical cancer screening in Italy. J Med Virol, 81, 529-35. crossref(new window)

2.
Andersson E, Karrberg C, Radberg T, et al (2011). Type-specific human papillomavirus E6/E7 mRNA detection by real-time PCR improves identification of cervical neoplasia. J Clin Microbiol, 49, 3794-99. crossref(new window)

3.
Ault KA (2007). Human papillomavirus vaccines and the potential for cross-protection between related HPV types. Gynecol Oncol, 107, 31-33. crossref(new window)

4.
Bruni L, Diaz M, Castellsague X, et al (2010). Cervical human papillomavirus prevalence in 5 continents: meta-analysis of 1 million women with normal cytological findings. J Infect Dis, 202, 1789-99. crossref(new window)

5.
Clifford GM, Gallus S, Herrero R, et al (2005). Worldwide distribution of human papillomavirus types in cytologically normal women in the international agency for research on cancer HPV prevalence surveys: a pooled analysis. Lancet, 366, 991-8. crossref(new window)

6.
Coquillard G, Palao B, Patterson BK (2011) Quantification of intracellular HPV E6/E7 mRNA expression increases the specificity and positive predictive value of cervical cancer screening compared to HPV DNA. Gynecologic Oncol, 120, 89-93. crossref(new window)

7.
Cox, JT (2009). History of the use ofHPV testing in cervical screening and in the management of abnormal cervical screening results. J Clin Virol, 45, 3-12. crossref(new window)

8.
de Sanjose S, Serrano B, Castellsague X, et al (2012). Human papillomavirus (HPV) and related cancers in the global alliance for vaccines and immunization (GAVI) countries. A WHO/ICO HPV information centre report. Vaccine, 30, 1-83.

9.
Ding X, Liu Z, Su J, et al (2014). Human papillomavirus typespecific prevalence in women referred for colposcopic examination in Beijing. J Med Virol, 86, 1937-43. crossref(new window)

10.
Doorbar J (2006). Molecular biology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer. Clinical science, 110, 525-41. crossref(new window)

11.
Ergunay K, Misirlioglu M, Pinar F, et al (2007). Human papilloma virus DNA in cervical samples with cytological abnormalities and typing of the virus. Mikrobiyol Bul, 41, 219-26.

12.
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al (2011). Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin, 61, 69-90. crossref(new window)

13.
Kim S, Lee D, Park S, et al (2012). REBA HPV-$ID^{(R)}$ for efficient genotyping of human papillomavirus in clinical samples from Korean patients. J Med Virol, 84, 1248-53. crossref(new window)

14.
Kjaer SK, Breugelmans G, Munk C, et al (2008). Populationbased prevalence, type- and age-specific distribution of HPV in women before introduction of an HPV-vaccination program in Denmark. Int J Cancer, 123, 1864-70. crossref(new window)

15.
Laudadio, J (2013). Human papillomavirus detection: testing methodologies and their clinical utility in cervical cancer screening. Adv Anat Pathol, 20, 158-67. crossref(new window)

16.
Lee, D, Kim S, Park S, et al (2011). Human papillomavirus prevalence in gangwon province using reverse blot hybridization assay. Korean J Pathol, 45, 348-53. crossref(new window)

17.
Li N, Franceschi S, Howell-Jones R, et al (2011). Human papillomavirus type distribution in 30,848 invasive cervical cancers worldwide: Variation by geographical region, histological type and year of publication. Int J Cancer, 128, 927-35. crossref(new window)

18.
Liu XX, Fan XL, Yu YP, et al (2014). Human papillomavirus prevalence and type-distribution among women in Zhejiang province, southeast china: across-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis, 14, 708-14. crossref(new window)

19.
Mayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I, et al (2007). Human papillomavirus DNA versus papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med, 357, 1579-88. crossref(new window)

20.
Molden T, Kraus I, Karlsen F, et al (2005). Comparison of human papillomavirus messenger RNA and DNA detection: a cross sectional study of 4,136 women >30 years of age with a 2-year follow-up of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 14, 367-72. crossref(new window)

21.
Munger K, Baldwin A, Edwards KM, et al (2004). Mechanisms of human papillomavirus-induced oncogenesis. J Virol, 78, 11451-60. crossref(new window)

22.
Okadome M, Saito T, Tanaka H, et al (2014). Potential impact of combined high- and low-risk human papillomavirus infection on the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 40, 561-69. crossref(new window)

23.
Poljak M, Seme K, Maver PJ, et al (2013). Human papillomavirus prevalence and type-distribution, cervical cancer screening practices and current status of vaccination implementation in Central and Eastern Europe. Vaccine, 7, 59-70.

24.
Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, et al (2008). New technologies for cervical cancer screening working group. Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test. J Natl Cancer Inst, 100, 492-501. crossref(new window)

25.
Sotlar K, Stubner A, Diemer D, et al (2004). Detection of highrisk human papillomavirus E6 and E7 oncogene transcripts in cervical scrapes by nested RT-polymerase chain reaction. J Med Virol, 74, 107-16. crossref(new window)

26.
Sun B, He J, Chen X, et al (2014). Prevalence and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus infection in harbin, Northeast China. Arch Virol, 159, 1027-32. crossref(new window)

27.
Sorbye SW, Fismen S, Gutteberg T, et al (2010). Triage of women with minor cervical lesions: data suggesting a ''test and treat'' approach for HPV E6/E7 mRNA testing. PLoS One, 5, 12724-29. crossref(new window)

28.
Vizcaino AP, Moreno V, Bosch FX, et al (1998). International trends in the incidence of cervical cancer: I. Adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer, 75, 536-45. crossref(new window)

29.
Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al (1999). Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol, 189, 12-19. crossref(new window)

30.
zur Hausen, H (2009). Papillomaviruses in the causation of human cancers - a brief historical account. Virology, 384, 260-65. crossref(new window)