JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Clinical Significance of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance among Patients Undergoing Cervical Conization
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Clinical Significance of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance among Patients Undergoing Cervical Conization
Nishimura, Mai; Miyatake, Takashi; Nakashima, Ayaka; Miyoshi, Ai; Mimura, Mayuko; Nagamatsu, Masaaki; Ogita, Kazuhide; Yokoi, Takeshi;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Background: Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) feature a wide variety of cervical cells, including benign and malignant examples. The management of ASCUS is complicated. Guidelines for office gynecology in Japan recommend performing a high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) test as a rule. The guidelines also recommend repeat cervical cytology after 6 and 12 months, or immediate colposcopy. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical significance of ASCUS. Materials and Methods: Between January 2012 and December 2014, a total of 162 patients underwent cervical conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3), carcinoma in situ, squamous cell carcinoma, microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma in situ at our hospital. The results of cervical cytology prior to conization, the pathology after conization, and high-risk HPV testing were obtained from clinical records and analyzed retrospectively. Results: Based on cervical cytology, 31 (19.1%) of 162 patients were primarily diagnosed with ASCUS. Among these, 25 (80.6%) were positive for high-risk HPV, and the test results of the remaining 6 patients (19.4%) were uncertain. In the final pathological diagnosis after conization, 27 (87.1%) and 4 patients (12.9%) were diagnosed with CIN3 and carcinoma in situ, respectively. Conclusions: Although ASCUS is known as a low-risk abnormal cervical cytology, approximately 20% of patients who underwent cervical conization had ASCUS. The relationship between the cervical cytology of ASCUS and the final pathological results for CIN3 or invasive carcinoma should be investigated statistically. In cases of ASCUS, we recommend HPV tests or colposcopic examination rather than cytological follow-up, because of the risk of missing CIN3 or more advanced disease.
 Keywords
ASC-US;colposcopy;abnormal cervical cytology;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Silent High Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Atypical Smears from Liquid Based Cervical Cytology - Three Years Experience in Thammasat University Hospital,;;;;;;;

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2016. vol.17. 9, pp.4353-4356 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Arbyn M, Buntinx F, Van Ranst M, et al (2004). Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst, 96, 280-93. crossref(new window)

2.
Arbyn M, Paraskevaidis E, Martin-Hirsch P, Prendiville W, Dillner J (2005). Clinical utility of HPV-DNA detection: triage of minor cervical lesions, follow-up of women treated for high-grade CIN: an update of pooled evidence. Gynecol Oncol, 99, 7-11. crossref(new window)

3.
Arbyn M, Roelens J, Simoens C et al (2013). Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3, 8054.

4.
ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group (2003). Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 188, 1383-92. crossref(new window)

5.
Jiang L, Zeng Yan, Li J et al (2011). Performance of high-risk human papillomavirus testing in the triage of abnormal cervical cytology among Chinese younger women in Shanghai, China. Asian Pac J Cnacer Prev, 12, 2963-68.

6.
Katki HA, Schiffman M, Castle PE, et al (2013). Benchmarking CIN 3+ risk as the basis for incorporating HPV and Pap cotesting into cervical screening and management guidelines. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 17, 28-35. crossref(new window)

7.
Katki HA, Schiffman M, Castle PE, et al (2013). Five-year risks of CIN 3+ and cervical cancer among women with HPV testing of ASC-US Pap results. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 17, 36-42. crossref(new window)

8.
Kececioglu M, Seckin B, Baser E, et al (2013). Cost and effectiveness comparison of immediate colposcopy versus human papillomavirus DNA testing in management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Turkish women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 511-14. crossref(new window)

9.
Kim JJ, Wright TC, Goldie SJ (2002). Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. JAMA, 287, 2382-90. crossref(new window)

10.
Kulasingam SL, Kim JJ, Lawrence WF, et al (2006). Costeffectiveness analysis based on the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Triage Study (ALTS). J Natl Cancer Inst, 98, 92-100. crossref(new window)

11.
Legood R, Gray A, Wolstenholme J, Moss S (2006). Lifetime effects, costs, and cost effectiveness of testing for human papillomavirus to manage low grade cytological abnormalities: results of the NHS pilot studies. BMJ, 332, 79-85. crossref(new window)

12.
Mojgan KZ, Fariba Binesh, Zohre Kazemi, et al (2011). Value of colposcopy in the early diagnosis of cervical cancer in patients with abnormal Pap smears at Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 3439-41.

13.
Tokmak A, Guzel AI, Ozgu E, et al (2014). Clinical significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in detecting preinvasive cervical lesions in post-menopausal Turkish women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 6639-41. crossref(new window)

14.
Thitichaya P, Panya S, Watcharin C, Kornkarn B, Komsun S (2015). Colposcopy requirement of Papanicolaou smear after atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) by follow-up protocol in an urban gynaecology clinic, a retrospective study in Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 16, 4977-80. crossref(new window)

15.
TOMBOLA Group (2009). Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 339, 2546-56. crossref(new window)