JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Assessing the EORTC QLQ-BM22 Module Using Rasch Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis across Countries: a Comprehensive Psychometric Evaluation in Patients with Bone Metastases
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Assessing the EORTC QLQ-BM22 Module Using Rasch Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis across Countries: a Comprehensive Psychometric Evaluation in Patients with Bone Metastases
Lin, Chung-Ying; Pakpour, Amir H;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Background: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Bone Metastases Module (EORTC QLQ-BM22) is a recently designed supplement to EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Additional psychometric properties, especially using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the Rasch model, are warranted. Materials and Methods: A total of 573 patients with bone metastases were enrolled from eight countries with a meanSD age of . Slightly more than two thirds of them were female (n
 Keywords
Rasch analysis;confirmatory factor analysis;bone metastases;quality of life;EORTC QLQ-BM22;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Using the Affiliate Stigma Scale with caregivers of people with dementia: psychometric evaluation, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, 2016, 8, 1  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Amin L, Rosenbaum P, Barr R, et al (2012). Rasch analysis of the PedsQL: an increased understanding of the properties of a rating scale. J Clin Epidemiol, 65, 1117-23. crossref(new window)

2.
Binda D, Vanhoutte EK, Cavaletti G, et al (2013). Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale for patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN-R-ODS). Eur J Cancer, 49, 2910-8. crossref(new window)

3.
Chang CC, Wu TH, Chen CY, et al (2014a). Psychometric evaluation of the internalized stigma of mental illness scale for patients with mental illnesses: measurement invariance across time. PLoS One, 9, 98767. crossref(new window)

4.
Chang KC, Wang JD, Tang HP, et al (2014b). Psychometric evaluation, using Rasch analysis, of the WHOQOL-BREF in heroin-dependent people undergoing methadone maintenance treatment: further item validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 12, 148. crossref(new window)

5.
Cheng CP, Luh WM, Yang AL, et al (In press). Agreement of children and parents scores on Chinese version of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0: further psychometric development. Appl Res Qual Life.

6.
Chow E, Bottomley A (2009). Understanding the EORTC QLQ-BM22, the module for patients with bone metastases. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 9, 461-5. crossref(new window)

7.
Chow E, Hoskin P, Mitera G, et al (2012a). Update of the international consensus on palliative radiotherapy endpoints for future clinical trials in bone metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 82, 1730-7. crossref(new window)

8.
Chow E, Nguyen J, Zhang L, et al (2012b). International field testing of the reliability and validity of the EORTC QLQ-BM22 module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with bone metastases. Cancer, 118, 1457-65. crossref(new window)

9.
Coleman RE (2000). Management of bone metastases. Oncologist, 5, 463-70. crossref(new window)

10.
Coleman RE (2006). Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res, 12, 6243-9. crossref(new window)

11.
Costa L, Badia X, Chow E, et al (2008). Impact of skeletal complications on patients' quality of life, mobility, and functional independence. Support Care Cancer, 16, 879-89. crossref(new window)

12.
DeRoos YS, Allen-Meares P (1993). Rasch analysis. J Soc Serv Res. 161-7.

13.
Dewolf L, Koller M, Velikova G, et al 2009. Translation procedure, brussels, belgium, EORTC Quality of Life Group.

14.
Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, et al 2001. The EORTC QLQC30 Scoring Manual, Brussels, Belgium, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

15.
Hobart J, Cano S (2009). Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Health Technol Assess, 13, 1-177.

16.
Jafari P, Bagheri Z, Safe M (2012). Item and response-category functioning of the Persian version of the KIDSCREEN-27: Rasch partial credit model. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 10, 127. crossref(new window)

17.
Khan A, Chien CW, Brauer SG (2013). Rasch-based scoring offered more precision in differentiating patient groups in measuring upper limb function. J Clin Epidemiol, 66, 681-7. crossref(new window)

18.
Kline RB 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, New York, Guilford Press.

19.
Lai JS, Teresi J, Gershon R (2005). Procedures for the analysis of differential item functioning (DIF) for small sample sizes. Eval Health Prof, 28, 283-94. crossref(new window)

20.
Lin CY, Luh WM, Cheng CP, et al (2014). Evaluating the wording effect and psychometric properties of the Kid-KINDL: using the multitrait-multimethod approach. Eur J Psychol Assess, 30, 100-9. crossref(new window)

21.
Lin CY, Luh WM, Cheng CP, et al (2013). Measurement equivalence across child self-reports and parent-proxy reports in the Chinese version of the pediatric quality of life inventory version 4.0. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev, 44, 583-90. crossref(new window)

22.
Lin CY, Yang SC, Lai WW, et al (2015). Rasch models suggested the satisfactory psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief among lung cancer patients. J Health Psychol.

23.
Linacre JM, Wright BD 2009. A user's guide to WINSTEPS, chicago, MESA Press.

24.
Puskulluoglu M, Tomaszewski KA, Bottomley A, et al (2014). Validation of the polish version of the EORTC QLQ-BM22 module for the assessment of health-related quality of life in patients with bone metastases. Qual Life Res, 23, 527-32. crossref(new window)

25.
Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, et al (2009). A simulation study provided sample size guidance for differential item functioning (DIF) studies using short scales. J Clin Epidemiol, 62, 288-95. crossref(new window)

26.
Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, et al (2010). Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 8, 81.

27.
Suhonen R, Schmidt LA, Katajisto J, et al (2013). Cross-cultural validity of the individualised care scale - a rasch model analysis. J Clin Nurs, 22, 648-60.

28.
Yekaninejad MS, Ahmadzadeh A, Mosavi SH, et al (2014). The reliability and validity of the iranian version of the european organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire for patients with bone metastases: the EORTC QLQ-BM22. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 14, 147-56. crossref(new window)

29.
Zeng L, Chow E, Bedard G, et al (2012). Quality of life after palliative radiation therapy for patients with painful bone metastases: results of an international study validating the EORTC QLQ-BM22. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 84, 337-42.