JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Study on Classification of Limonite and Saprolite from Nickel Laterite Ores
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Study on Classification of Limonite and Saprolite from Nickel Laterite Ores
Seo, Joobeom; Kim, Kee-seok; Bae, In-kook; Lee, Jae-young; Kim, Hyung-seok;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Nickel laterite ore is classified into two principal ore types: saprolite (silicate ore) and limonite (oxide ore). Saprolite-type ore characterized by high magnesia and silica contents is treated by pyrometallurgy process. On the other hand, limonite-type ore is subjected to hydrometallurgy process to produce nickel products. Hydrometallurgy process requires that a raw material to meet the demands that Si+Mg contents lower than 10% and Fe content over than 40%. It is therefore required that separation of saprilite-type ore to use nickel laterite ore as a raw material for hydrometallurgy process. In this study, separation of sparolite-type ore and limonite-type ore from nickel laterite ore from New Caledonia has been tried by dry classification. The results show that -5 mm size fraction and +5 mm size fraction of the nickel laterite ore contains mainly limonite-type ore and saprolite-type ore, respectively. To understand the moisture content of the raw ore on the dry classification, nickel laterite ore with different moisture contents of 23.0% and 9.1% were subjected to the dry classification. The results show that drying of the ore makes the separation more efficient as the amount of the fine product, that can be subjected to hydrometallurgy process without further separation or drying operations, was increased.
 Keywords
Nickel;Limonite;Saprolite;Laterite;Classification;Separation;
 Language
Korean
 Cited by
 References
1.
Kim Wantae, Kim Sangbae, 2009 : Current status of laterite ore processing technology, The mineralogical society of Korea, Minerals and Industry ISSN: 1299-7496, 22(2), pp.71-83.

2.
Lu, J., Liu, S., Shangguan J., Du. W., Pan, F., and Yang, S. 2013 : The effect of sodium sulphate on the hydrogen reduction process of nickel laterite ore, Miner. Eng., 49, pp.154-164. crossref(new window)

3.
Harris, C.T., Peacey, J.G., and Pickles, C.A., 2011 : Selective sulphidation of a nickelferous lateritic ore, Miner. Eng., 24, pp.651-660. crossref(new window)

4.
Zhu, D.Q., Cui, Y., Vining, K., Hapugoda, S., Douglas, J. Pan, J., and Zheng, G. L., 2012, Upgrading low nickel content laterite ores using selective reduction followed by magnetic separation, Int. J. Miner. Process, 106-109, pp.1-7. crossref(new window)

5.
Norgate, T., and Jahanshahi, S., 2011 : Assessing the energy and greenhourse gas foortprints of nickel laterite processing, Miner. Eng., 23, pp.698-707.

6.
Cho, Hyen Goo, Kim, Soon-Oh, and Kim, Sang Bae, 2011 : Mineralogy of Garnierite from New Caledonian Ni Lateritic Ore, J. Miner. Soc. Korea, 24(4), pp.253-263. crossref(new window)

7.
Wells, M.A., Ramanaidou, E.R., Verrall, M., and Tessarolo, C., 2009 : Mineralogy and crystal chemistry of "garnierites" in the Goro lateritic nickel deposit, New Caledonia, Eur. J. Mineral., 21, pp.467-483, crossref(new window)

8.
Tauler, E., Proenza, J.A., Gali, S., Lewis J.F., Labrador, M., Garcia-Romero, E., Suarez, M., Longo, F., and Bloise, D.G., 2009 : Ni-sepiolite-falcondoite in garnierite mineralization from the Falcono Ni-laterite deposit, Dominican Republic, Clay Minerals, 44, pp.435-454. crossref(new window)

9.
Mudd, G., 2010 : Global trends and issues in nickel mining: sulfides versus laterites, Ore Geol. Rev., 38, pp9-26, crossref(new window)

10.
Eckleman, M., 2010 : Facility-level energy and greenhouse gas life-cycle assessment of the global nickel industry, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 54, pp.256-266. crossref(new window)

11.
Kim, K., Seo, J., Bae, I., Bae, K., You, K., Lee, J., and Kim, H., 2014 : A Study on separation of limonite and saprolite from nickel laterite ores, J. of Korean Inst. of Resources Recycling, 23(6), pp.12-21.