JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Policy Safety Stock Cost Optimization : Xerox Consumable Supply Chain Case Study
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Policy Safety Stock Cost Optimization : Xerox Consumable Supply Chain Case Study
Suh, Eun Suk;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Inventory, cost, and the level of service are three interrelated key metrics that most supply chain organizations are striving to optimize. One way to achieve this goal is to create a simulation model to conduct sensitivity analysis and optimization on several different supply chain policies that can be implemented in actual operation. In this paper, a case of Xerox global supply chain modeling and analysis to assess several "what if" scenarios for the consumable policy safety stock is presented. The simulation model, combined with analytical cost model and optimization module, is used to optimize the policy safety stock level to achieve the lowest total value chain cost. It was shown quantitatively that the policy safety stock can be reduced, but it is offset by the inbound premium transportation cost to expedite supplies in shortage, and the outbound premium transportation cost to send supplies to customers via express shipment, requiring fine balance.
 Keywords
Supply Chain Model;Discrete Event Simulation;Policy Safety Stock Optimization;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Bottani, E. and Montanari, R. (2010), Supply Chain Cesign and Cost Analysis through Simulation, International Journal of Production Research, 48(10), 2859-2886. crossref(new window)

2.
Cannella, S. (2013), Supply Chain Simulation : A System Dynamics Approach for Improving Performance, Transportation Journal, 52(1), 144-146. crossref(new window)

3.
Chatfield, D. C. (2013), Underestimating the Bullwhip Effect : A Simulation Study of the Decomposability Assumption, International Journal of Production Research, 51(1), 230-244. crossref(new window)

4.
Finke, G. R., Singh, M., and Schonsleben, P. (2012), Production Lead Time Variability Simulation-Insights from a Case Study, International Journal of Industrial Engineering-Theory Applications and Practice, 19(5), 213-220.

5.
Harrison, J. R., Lin, Z., Carroll, G. R., and Carley, K. M. (2007), Simulation Modeling in Organizational and Management Research, Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1229-1245. crossref(new window)

6.
Hilletofth, P. and Lattila, L. (2012), Agent Based Decision Support in the Supply Chain Context, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 112 (8-9), 1217-1235. crossref(new window)

7.
Hussain, M., Drake, P. R., and Lee, D. M. (2012), Quantifying the Impact of a Supply Chain's Design Parameters on the Bullwhip Effect Using Simulation and Taguchi Design of Experiments, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42(10), 947-968. crossref(new window)

8.
Hussain, M. and Saber, H. (2012), Exploring the Bullwhip Effect Using Simulation and Taguchi Experimental Design, International Journal of Logistics-Research and Applications, 15(4), 231-249. crossref(new window)

9.
Iannone, R., Miranda, S. and Riemma, S. (2007), Supply Chain Distributed Simulation : An Efficient Architecture for Multi-Model Synchronization, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 15(3), 221-236. crossref(new window)

10.
Jetly, G., Rossetti, C. L., and Handfield, R. (2012), A Multi-Agent Simulation of the Pharmaceutical Supply Chain, Journal of Simulation, 6(4), 215-226. crossref(new window)

11.
Kumar, S., McCreary, M. L., and Nottestad, D. A. (2011), Quantifying Supply Chain Trade-Offs Using Six Sigma, Simulation, and Designed Experiments to Develop a Flexible Distribution Network, Quality Engineering, 23(2), 180-203. crossref(new window)

12.
Li, J. and Chan, F. T. S. (2013), An Agent-Based Model of Supply Chains with Dynamic Structures, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(7), 5403-5413. crossref(new window)

13.
Lim, M. K., Tan, K., and Leung, S. C. H. (2013), Using a Multi-Agent System to Optimise Resource Utilisation in Multi-Site Manufacturing Facilities, International Journal of Production Research, 51(9), 2620-2638. crossref(new window)

14.
Mele, F. D., Espuna, A., and Puigjaner, L. (2006), Supply Chain Management through Dynamic Model Parameters Optimization, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 45(5), 1708-1721. crossref(new window)

15.
Mele, F. D., Guillen, G., Espuna, A., and Puigjaner, L. (2006), A Simulation-Based Optimization Framework for Parameter Optimization of Supply-Chain Networks, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 45(9), 3133-3148. crossref(new window)

16.
Mula, J., Campuzano-Bolarin, F., Diaz-Madronero, M., and Carpio, K. M. (2013), A System Dynamics Model for the Supply Chain Procurement Transport Problem : Comparing Spreadsheets, Fuzzy Programming and Simulation Approaches, International Journal of Production Research, 51(13), 4087-4104. crossref(new window)

17.
Rand, G. K. (2013), Supply Chain Simulation : A System Dynamics Approach for Improving Performance, Interfaces, 43(1), 99-101. crossref(new window)

18.
Rolon, M. and Martinez, E. (2012), Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation of an Autonomic Manufacturing Execution System, Computers in Industry, 63(1), 53-78. crossref(new window)

19.
Roy, R. and Arunachalam, R. (2004), Parallel Discrete Event Simulation Algorithm for Manufacturing Supply Chains, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(6), 622-629. crossref(new window)

20.
Ruiz-Torres, A. J. and Mahmoodi, F. (2010), Safety Stock Determination Based on Parametric Lead Time and Demand Information, International Journal of Production Research, 48(10), 2841-2857. crossref(new window)

21.
Santa-Eulalia, L. A., D'Amours, S., and Frayret, J. M. (2012), Agent-Based Simulations for Advanced Supply Chain Planning and Scheduling : The FAMASS Methodological Framework for Requirements Analysis, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 25(10), 963-980. crossref(new window)

22.
Tako, A. A. and Robinson, S. (2012), The Application of Discrete Event Simulation and System Dynamics in the Logistics and Supply Chain Context, Decision Support Systems, 52(4), 802-815. crossref(new window)

23.
Vidalakis, C., Tookey, J. E., and Sommerville, J. (2013), Demand Uncertainty in Construction Supply Chains : A Discrete Event Simulation Study, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(8), 1194-1204. crossref(new window)

24.
Wangphanich, P., Kara, S., and Kayis, B. (2010), Analysis of the Bullwhip Effect in Multi-Product, Multi-Stage Supply Chain Systems-A Simulation Approach, International Journal of Production Research, 48(15), 4501-4517. crossref(new window)

25.
Yoo, T., Cho, H., and Yucesan, E. (2010), Hybrid Algorithm for Discrete Event Simulation Based Supply Chain Optimization, Expert Systems with Applications, 37(3), 2354-2361. crossref(new window)

26.
Yum, B., Kim, S., Seo, S., Byun, J., and Lee, S. (2013), The Taguchi Robust Design Method : Current Status and Future Directions, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 39(5), 325-341. crossref(new window)