JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
A Design for Six Sigma: A Robust Tool in Systems Engineering Process
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
A Design for Six Sigma: A Robust Tool in Systems Engineering Process
Yoon, Hee-Kweon; Byun, Jai-Hyun;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
While systems engineering has been widely applied to complex system development, some evidences are reported about major budget and schedule overruns in systems engineering applied. On the other hand, many organizations have been deploying Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) to build Six Sigma momentums in the area of design and development for their products and processes. To explore the possibility of having a DFSS complement systems engineering process, this process reviews the systems engineering with their categories of effort and DFSS with its methodologies. A comparison of the systems engineering process and DFSS indicates that DFSS can be a complement to systems engineering for delivering higher quality products to customers faster at a lower cost. We suggest a simplified framework of systems engineering process, that is, PADOV which was derived from the generic systems engineering process which has been applied to the development of T-50 advanced supersonic trainer aircraft by Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) with technical assistance of Lockheed Martin. We demonstrated that each phase of PADOV framework is comprehensively matched to the pertinent categories of systems engineering effort from various standards.
 Keywords
Design for Six Sigma;DFSS;Systems Engineering Process;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Aboelmaged, M. G. (2010), Six Sigma quality: a structured review and implications for future research, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 27(3), 268-317. crossref(new window)

2.
Agarwal, R. (2006), Managing outsourcing: IT or business, Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Systems, Thiruvencheery, India, 662-666.

3.
Andersson, R., Eriksson, H., and Torstensson, H. (2006), Similarities and differences between TQM, Six Sigma and lean, The TQM Magazine, 18(3), 282- 296. crossref(new window)

4.
Antony, J. (2002), Design for Six Sigma: a breakthrough business improvement strategy for achieving competitive advantage, Work Study, 51(1), 6-8. crossref(new window)

5.
Atwood, J. (2005), Using design for Six Sigma, iSIXSIGMA Magazine, 1(4), 1-7.

6.
Chatt, D. M., Hendricks, M. E., and Wintersteen, D. C. (2008), Joint design for electronics cooling heat exchangers project example, iSIXSIGMA Magazine, 4(4), 1-7.

7.
Chowdhury, S. (2002), Design for Six Sigma: the Revolutionary Process for Achieving Extraordinary Profits, Dearborn Trade Publishing, Chicago, IL.

8.
Chung, Y. C. and Hsu, Y. W. (2010), Research on the correlation between design for Six Sigma implementation activity levels, new product development strategies and new product development performance in Taiwan's high-tech manufacturers, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(6), 603-616. crossref(new window)

9.
Creveling, C. M., Slutscky, J., and Antis, D. (2003), Design for Six Sigma in Technology and Product Development, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

10.
Dean, F. F., Bentz, B., and Bahill, A. T. (1997), A road map for implementing systems engineering, SAND 97-0412, Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM.

11.
EIA (1999), ANSI/EIA-632-1998: Processes for Engineering a System, Electronic Industries Association, Arlington, VA.

12.
Harry, M. J. and Schroeder, R. (2000), Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World's Top Corporations, Currency, New York, NJ.

13.
Hasenkamp, T. (2010), Engineering Design for Six Sigma: a systematic approach, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 26(4), 317-324.

14.
Hilderbrand, B. (2007), Photoreceptor belt tensioning system project example, iSIXSIGMA Magazine, 3 (4), 1-7.

15.
Honour, E. C., Axelband, E., and Rhodes, D. (2004), Value of systems engineering, Technical Report, Lean Aerospace Initiative, Pensacola, FL.

16.
Honour, E. C. and Valerdi, R. (2006), Advancing an ontology for systems engineering to allow consistent measurement, Proceedings of the Conference on Systems Engineering Research, Los Angeles, CA, 1-12.

17.
IEEE (1999), 1220-1998 IEEE Standard for Application and Management of the Systems Engineering Process, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ.

18.
INCOSE (2007), Systems Engineering Handbook: a Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities, International Council on Systems Engineering, Seattle, WA.

19.
ISO (2002), ISO/IEC 15288: 2002-Systems Engineering: System Life Cycle Processes, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

20.
Judd, T. (2005), Program level design for Six Sigma, SAE Technical Report 2005-01-1210, SAE International, Warrendale, PA.

21.
Kasser, J. E. (2010), Seven systems engineering myths and the corresponding realities, Proceedings of the Systems Engineering Test and Evaluation Conference, Adelaide, Australia, 1-13.

22.
Kiemele, M. J. (2003), Using the design for Six Sigma (DFSS) approach to design, test, and evaluate to reduce program risk, Proceedings of the NDIA Software Test and Evaluation Summit/Workship, Victoria, Canada.

23.
Park, S. H. (2003), Six Sigma for Quality and Productivity Promotion, Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo, Japan.

24.
Sheard, S. A. and Lake, J. G. (1998), Systems engineering standards and models compared, Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Symposium of INCOSE, Vancouver, Canada.

25.
Soderborg, N. R. (2004), Design for Six Sigma at Ford, Six Sigma Forum Magazine, 4(1), 15-22.

26.
Tennant, G. (2002), Design for Six Sigma: Launching New Products and Services without Failure, Gower Publishing, Burlington, VT.

27.
Treichler, D. H. (2005), Design for Six Sigma: lessons learned: embedding DFSS within an organization's culture, Technology Today, 1, 20-21.

28.
US Department of Defense (1991), MIL-STD-499B Draft 910515: systems engineering, US Department of Defense, Washington, DC.

29.
Vandervort, C. L. and Kudlacik, E. L. (2001), GE generator technology update, GE Power Systems, Schenectady, NY, http://www.ge-energy.com/content/ multimedia/_files/downloads/ger4203.pdf.

30.
Vanek, F., Jackson, P., and Grzybowski, R. (2008), Systems engineering metrics and applications in product development: A critical literature review and agenda for further research, Systems Engineering, 11(2), 107-124. crossref(new window)

31.
Watson, G. H. and DeYoung, C. F. (2010), Design for Six Sigma: caveat emptor, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1(1), 66-84. crossref(new window)

32.
Wong, P. W. (2007), Motorola and Six Sigma, Proceedings of ASTD International Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, W110.

33.
Yang, K. and El-Haik, B. (2003), Design for Six Sigma: A Roadmap for Product Development, McGraw- Hill, New York, NY.

34.
Yoon, H. K. and Byun, J. H. (2011), A program level application of design for Six Sigma in the aircraft industry, Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, 10(3), 232-237. crossref(new window)