JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Strategic Cooperation and Failure in Innovation Processes: Empirical Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Strategic Cooperation and Failure in Innovation Processes: Empirical Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry
Park, Ji-Hyun; Gwon, Seong-Hoon; Hong, Soon-Ki;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The aim of this paper is to analyse the impacts of R&D cooperation and obstacles to technological innovation on the innovation failure of the Korean manufacturing firms. Two hierarchical regression models including interaction variables are employed for the analysis. Some interesting findings are: first, almost all the obstacles have positive and significant effects on the failure. Second, R&D cooperation positively or negatively moderates the impact of obstacles to technological innovation on the innovation failure, although R&D cooperation itself is not directly related to the failure. Third, the interaction effects between the cooperation and the obstacles influence the failure in various manners. This study is expected to help manufacturing firms which are under unfavourable environments to formulate their cooperation strategies successfully based on what they learn from the failure.
 Keywords
R&D Cooperation;Innovation Failure;Obstacle to Innovation;Technological Innovation;Manufacturing;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Arranz, N. and Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2007), The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms, Technovation, 28(1/2), 88-100.

2.
Atallah, G. (2002), Vertical R&D spillovers, cooperation, market structure, and innovation, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(3), 179-209. crossref(new window)

3.
Audretsch, D. B., Link, A. N., and Scott, J. T. (2002), Public/private technology partnerships: evaluating SBIR-supported research, Research Policy, 31(1), 145-158. crossref(new window)

4.
Baldwin, J. and Lin, Z. (2002), Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers, Research Policy, 31(1), 1-18. crossref(new window)

5.
Barge-Gil, A. (2010), Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators: an empirical analysis of their characteristics and behaviour, Technovation, 30(3), 195-206. crossref(new window)

6.
Bayona, C., Garcia-Marco, T., and Huerta, E. (2001), Firms' motivation for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms, Research Policy, 30(8), 1289-1307. crossref(new window)

7.
Becker, W. and Dietz, J. (2004), R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms: evidence for the German manufacturing industry, Research Policy, 33(2), 209-223. crossref(new window)

8.
Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., and Veugelers, R. (2004a), Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(8/9), 1237-1263. crossref(new window)

9.
Belderbos, R., Carree, M., and Lokshin, B. (2004b), Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33(10), 1477-1492. crossref(new window)

10.
Bruneel, J., D'Este, P., and Salter, A. (2010), Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration, Research Policy, 39(7), 858-868. crossref(new window)

11.
Busom, I. and Fernandez-Ribas, A. (2008), The impact of firm participation in R&D programmes on R&D partnerships, Research Policy, 37(2), 240-257. crossref(new window)

12.
Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2002), R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium, American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169-1184. crossref(new window)

13.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003), The era of open innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35-41.

14.
Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1989), Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D, The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569-596. crossref(new window)

15.
Cooper, A. C. (1981), Strategic management: new venture and small business, Long Range Planning, 14(5), 39-45. crossref(new window)

16.
David, A. P., Hall, B. H., and Toole, A. A. (2000), Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? a review of the econometric evidence, Research Policy, 29(4/5), 497-529. crossref(new window)

17.
Dodgson, M. (1993), Technological Collaboration in Industry: Strategy, Policy, and Internationalization in Innovation, Routledge, New York, NY.

18.
Dowling, M. and Helm, R. (2005), Product development success through cooperation: a study of entrepreneurial firms, Technovation, 26(4), 483-488.

19.
Ekvall, G. and Ryhammar, L. (1998), Leadership style, social climate and organizational outcomes: a study of a Swedish University Colleges, Creativity and Innovation Management, 7(3), 126-130. crossref(new window)

20.
Freel, M. S. (2003), Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity, Research Policy, 32(5), 751-770. crossref(new window)

21.
Freeman, C. B., Robertson, A., Achilladelis, G. B., and Jervis, P. (1972), A Study of Success and Failure in Industrial Innovation: Report on Project SAPPHO, Center for the Study of Industrial Innovation, University of Sussex, London.

22.
Fritsch, M. and Lukas, R. (2001), Who cooperates on R&D?, Research Policy, 30(2), 297-312. crossref(new window)

23.
Galia, F. and Legros, D. (2004), Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France, Research Policy, 33(8), 1185-1199. crossref(new window)

24.
Gautam, A. (2000), Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455. crossref(new window)

25.
Hagedoorn, J. (1993), Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: inter-organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences, Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371-385. crossref(new window)

26.
Howarth, C. S. (1994), The role of strategic alliances in the development of technology, Technovation, 14 (4), 243-257. crossref(new window)

27.
Hsu, F. M. and Hsueh, C. C. (2009), Measuring relative efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects: a three-stage approach, Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(2), 178-186. crossref(new window)

28.
Johne, A. F. and Snelson, P. A. (1988), Success factors in product innovation: a selective review of the literature, Journal Product Innovation Management, 5(2), 114-128. crossref(new window)

29.
Kaufmann, A. and Todtling, F. (2000), Science-industry interaction in the process of innovation: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems, Research Policy, 30(5), 791-804.

30.
Kim, H. H., Cho, G. W., Park, D. B., Seo, J. H., and Lee, J. R. (2008), Korea Innovation Survey 2008: Manufacturing, Science Technology Policy Institute, Seoul, Korea.

31.
Lhuillery, S. and Pfister, E. (2009), R&D cooperation and failure in innovation projects: empirical evidence from French CIS data, Research Policy, 38(1), 45-57. crossref(new window)

32.
Lin, B. W., Lee, Y., and Hung, S. C. (2006), R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance, Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 679-685. crossref(new window)

33.
Maidique, M. A. and Zirger, J. B. (1984), A study of success and failure in product innovation: the case of the U.S. electronics industry, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 31(4), 192-203.

34.
Mansfield, E. and Wagner, S. (1975), Organizational and strategic factors associated with probabilities of success in industrial R&D, The Journal of Business, 48(2), 179-198. crossref(new window)

35.
March-Chorda, I., Gunasekaran, A., and Lloria-Aramburo, B. (2002), Product development process in Spanish SMEs: an empirical research, Technovation, 22(5), 301-312. crossref(new window)

36.
Miotti, L. and Sachwald, F. (2003), Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: an integrated framework of analysis, Research Policy, 32(8), 1481-1499. crossref(new window)

37.
Mohnen, P. and Lars-Hendrik, R. (2005), Complementarities in innovation policy, European Economic Review, 49(6), 1431-1450. crossref(new window)

38.
Mohnen, P. and Rosa, J. M. (1999), Barriers to innovation in services industries in Canada, Statistics Canada, Ontario.

39.
Moriyasu, T., Zu, G., and Tsuji, H. (2010), Business collaboration support for offshore software development, Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, 9(3), 275-284. crossref(new window)

40.
Narula, R. (2004), R&D collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation, Technovation, 24(2), 153-161. crossref(new window)

41.
OECD (2005), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (3rd ed.), OECD, Paris.

42.
Rubenstein, A. H., Chakrabarti, A. K., O'Keefe, R. D., Souder, W. E., and Young, H. C. (1976), Factors influencing innovation success at the project level, Research Management, 19(3), 15-19.

43.
Santarelli, E. and Piergiovanni, R. (1996), Analyzing literature-based innovation output indicators: the Italian experience, Research Policy, 25(5), 689-711. crossref(new window)

44.
Steinherr, A. and Huveneers, C. (1994), On the performance of differently regulated financial institutions: some empirical evidence, Journal of Banking and Finance, 18(2), 271-306. crossref(new window)

45.
Tether, B. S. (2002), Who co-operates for innovation, and how to avoid catastrophe, Harvard Business Review why: an empirical analysis, Research Policy, 31(6), 947-967. crossref(new window)

46.
Tinsley, C. H., Dillon, R. L., and Madsen, P. M. (2011), How to avoid catastrophe, Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 90-97.

47.
Tourigny, D. and Le, C. D. (2004), Impediments to innovation faced by Canadian manufacturing firms, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(3), 217-250. crossref(new window)

48.
Tyler, B. B. and Steensma, H. K. (1995), Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities: a cognitive modeling perspectives, Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 43-70. crossref(new window)

49.
Veugelers, R. and Cassiman, B. (2005), R&D cooperation between firms and universities: some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(5/6), 355-379. crossref(new window)

50.
Zahra, S. A. (1996), Technology strategy and financial performance: examining the moderating role of the firm's competitive environment, Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3), 189-219. crossref(new window)